| Back Submit a hand 
 Handnr: 909090Submitted by : the cleaner
 
 ***** Hand History for Game 1111111111 *****  Poker Stars $100.00 USD NL Texas Hold'em - Thursday, June 09, 06:12:24 ET 2011
 Table Zelia V  Real Money
 Seat 3 is the button
 Seat 1: Player1   $74.20 USD   - VPIP: 46, PFR: 24, 3B: 6, AF: 1.2, Hands: 940
 Seat 2: Player2   $100.00 USD   - VPIP: 21, PFR: 16, 3B: 5, AF: 2.5, Hands: 3157
 Seat 3: Hero   $100.00 USD   - VPIP: 21, PFR: 18, 3B: 10, AF: 3.5, Hands: 188585
 Seat 4: Player4   $108.30 USD   - VPIP: 22, PFR: 17, 3B: 8, AF: 1.6, Hands: 1560
 Seat 5: Player5   $125.90 USD   - VPIP: 22, PFR: 17, 3B: 8, AF: 2.9, Hands: 3740
 Seat 6: Player6   $101.50 USD   - VPIP: 27, PFR: 22, 3B: 9, AF: 2.2, Hands: 8691
 Player4 posts small blind [$0.50 USD].
 Player5 posts big blind [$1.00 USD].
 
 Holecards
 Dealt to Hero [XX]
 Player6 folds
 Player1 folds
 Player2 folds
 Hero raises [$2.50 USD]
 Player4 calls [$2.00 USD]
 Player5 folds
 
 Flop (Pot : $6.00)
 
 
     Player4 checks
 Hero bets [$4.30 USD]
 Player4 calls [$4.30 USD]
 
 Turn (Pot : $14.60)
 
 
      Player4 checks
 Hero bets [$10.55 USD]
 Player4 raises [$36.00 USD]
 Hero raises [$82.65
   
            		
            		|  | Comments |  |  1 | | 
                            
                            |  | the cleaner   Germany. Jun 09 2011 18:21. Posts 3014 |  |  |  | | Player4 $108.30 USD - VPIP: 22, PFR: 17, 3B: 8, AF: 1.6, Hands: 1560
 what's the weakest hand u would call me with?
 | 
 |  | | there are no facts only interpretations |  | 
 | 
 
 |  1 | |  |  |  |  |  | |  | Last edit: 09/06/2011 18:24 | 
 | 
 
 |  1 | |  |  |  | | i dont think he's weak at all.maybe he's getting fancy with a big draw but I doubt it. in his position i would call with AQ i think, doesnt really make sense for villian to shove if he has the nuts. | 
 | 
 
 |  1 | | 
                            
                            |  | patti   United States. Jun 09 2011 18:56. Posts 550 |  |  |  | | i don't think this is a board he expects you to cbet light, therefore i don't expect him to c/r u all that light either
 i can't explain the reasoning why but i would expect most sets and two pairs to c/r the flop, but would also expect in those rare cases where one does slow play in villains shoes to be slow playing 2 pairs rather than sets.
 
 obviously he can flat the nut straight with redraws as well and c/r the turn.
 
 but as stated earlier, i don't think villain percieves u to be light on this flop when u cbet, and therefore don't expect him to be c/r u light either.
 | 
 | 
 
 |  1 | | 
                            
                            |  | the cleaner   Germany. Jun 09 2011 18:57. Posts 3014 |  |  |  | | 
 |  | On  June 09 2011 17:23  gororokgororok wrote: in his position?
 | 
 
 
 yes
 | 
 |  | | there are no facts only interpretations |  | 
 | 
 
 |  1 | | 
                            
                            |  | the cleaner   Germany. Jun 09 2011 19:34. Posts 3014 |  |  |  |  |  | | there are no facts only interpretations | Last edit: 09/06/2011 19:41 | 
 | 
 
 |  1 | | 
                            
                            |  | Jhyun88   United States. Jun 09 2011 20:21. Posts 1383 |  |  |  | | I expect AQ to raise flop, so this looks like 9Ts or him getting fancy with strong draws. The c/raise on this turn is esp strong since you're double barreling represents a very strong range. That being said, I think your shove is always getting called here by a strong hand. But you never know what the crazies do in bvb so I don't really mind your shove. my 2c. | 
 | 
 
 |  1 | | 
                            
                            |  | the cleaner   Germany. Jun 09 2011 20:47. Posts 3014 |  |  |  | | yea i agree that he will call my shove with his strong hands. i just thought he didn't have to many strong hands in his range. T9s and maybe KT that decided to flat the flop, but i have a blocker too. but i think you guys are probably right and taking a free card is the better play in the long run. the think i hate about it is that if we just call turn we are basically telling him what type of hand we have and have to give up on river, and might not get paid off if a club or T hits. | 
 |  | | there are no facts only interpretations | Last edit: 09/06/2011 20:49 | 
 | 
 
 |  1 | | 
                            
                            |  | sunnysky7   . Jun 09 2011 21:38. Posts 1549 |  |  |  | | 
 |  | On  June 09 2011 19:47  the cleaner wrote: yea i agree that he will call my shove with his strong hands. i just thought he didn't have to many strong hands in his range. T9s and maybe KT that decided to flat the flop, but i have a blocker too. but i think you guys are probably right and taking a free card is the better play in the long run. the think i hate about it is that if we just call turn we are basically telling him what type of hand we have and have to give up on river, and might not get paid off if a club or T hits.
 | 
 
 
 You can check it back TPWK or KQ QT as well , theres still a lot of combos you can check in position and pot control the size
 even the flush hit i think villain still check/call a lot his strong  range bcuz in villain's shoes many river cards you can bluff with ofc include flush
 i am not saying 2-barral this board and get it in is a missplay , but i either dont think when villain chk/call the flop he would fold the turn 8 too often
 | 
 |  | |  | Last edit: 09/06/2011 21:44 | 
 | 
 
 |  1 | | 
                            
                            |  | bigredhoss   Cook Islands. Jun 09 2011 22:35. Posts 8649 |  |  |  | | i don't play anymore but isn't this like pure gambling? this is the last situation i would ever expect villain to be light/bluffing. like i said i could be wrong but i would rather open-shove flop than do this. | 
 |  | | Truck-Crash Life | Last edit: 09/06/2011 22:37 | 
 | 
 
 |  1 | | 
                            
                            |  | the cleaner   Germany. Jun 10 2011 00:58. Posts 3014 |  |  |  | | well it seems like gambling vs his hand. at the moment the hand played out i wrongly assumed that my combined equity and FE was enough to make this +EV. my mistake was to think that he had more bluffs/semibluffs/spazzes and less legitimate hands in his range. | 
 |  | | there are no facts only interpretations |  | 
 | 
 
 |  |  | 
 |