Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 904401
Submitted by : LemOn[5thF]
***** Hand History for Game 1111111111 ***** Poker Stars
$25.00 USD NL Texas Hold'em - Sunday, April 24, 06:10:23 ET 2011
Table Robeson II Real Money
Seat 1 is the button
Seat 1: Player1 $10.00 USD - VPIP: 30, PFR: 20, 3B: 10, AF: Infinity, Hands: 30
Seat 2: Player2 $24.65 USD - VPIP: 13, PFR: 11, 3B: 0, AF: 6.0, Hands: 114
Seat 3: Hero $25.00 USD - VPIP: 24, PFR: 20, 3B: 8, AF: 3.5, Hands: 199194
Seat 4: Player4 $13.90 USD - VPIP: 20, PFR: 10, 3B: 0, AF: 1.8, Hands: 79
Seat 5: Player5 $25.25 USD - VPIP: 23, PFR: 15, 3B: 5, AF: 1.8, Hands: 226
Seat 6: Player6 $20.22 USD - VPIP: 26, PFR: 18, 3B: 3, AF: 1.1, Hands: 136
Player2 posts small blind [$0.10 USD].
Hero posts big blind [$0.25 USD].
Holecards
Dealt to Hero [  ]
Player4 folds
Player5 folds
Player6 folds
Player1 folds
Player2 raises [$0.65 USD]
Hero calls [$0.50 USD]
Flop (Pot : $1.40)
  
Player2 checks
Hero bets [$1.10 USD]
Player2 raises [$2.75 USD]
Hero folds
Player2 wins $1.65 USD
Player2 wins $3.52 USD from main pot
 |
Comments |
 |
1
 |
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Apr 24 2011 06:46. Posts 15163 | | |
Ok what the hell...
Is this like always nuts from a tight guy?
Should I assume his betting range is weaker when he does this presumably with nuts?
Is bluffing like this good and why should I do it?
I don't understand c/r as PFR at all, is there any book/vid article that focuses on it? |
| |
|
| 1
 |
Almebeast Sweden. Apr 24 2011 07:57. Posts 797 | | |
Usually nuts in my experience, but I dont really understand what ppls reasons for c/r as PFR are either. I never do it myself.
I saw you writing somewhere else that not c/r-ing as PFR leaves you unbalanced. Why is that? If you never c/r then you dont have a c/r-range to balance and you should be able to balance your betting and checking ranges.
|
|
| After all is said and done, more is said than done. | |
|
| 1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Apr 24 2011 09:00. Posts 15163 | | |
| | On April 24 2011 06:57 Almebeast wrote:
Usually nuts in my experience, but I dont really understand what ppls reasons for c/r as PFR are either. I never do it myself.
I saw you writing somewhere else that not c/r-ing as PFR leaves you unbalanced. Why is that? If you never c/r then you dont have a c/r-range to balance and you should be able to balance your betting and checking ranges.
|
As in when you check, you either always fold or bluffcatch weak range oop. With me you can pretty much always know that I am weak when I check and you can freely abuse it, it would be nice if a reg knew I don't c/f 100% or fold to barrels of the time.
And you know, doing stuff that people don't expect takes them out of their comfort zone, like this guy did to me, I am pretty sure I would spew some of the time when I am tilted. And it's also a ridiculously cheap bluff, I was quite aggro and he expected me to bet a ton and he had a very tight image, c/r as a bluff is like duper awesome here against me
I'll maybe try it out here and there and see what happens ? |
|
| 93% Sure! | Last edit: 24/04/2011 10:05 |
|
| 1
|
Almebeast Sweden. Apr 24 2011 13:03. Posts 797 | | |
Until very recently I played just like you describe, with a super weak checking range. In theory you can of course be balanced without c/r-ing but that means you have to c/c with some hands that can stand 3 barrels, which feels pretty meh, so c/r-ing might be a good idea I guess. Good luck. |
|
| After all is said and done, more is said than done. | |
|
| 1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Apr 24 2011 13:14. Posts 15163 | | |
Yeah and you know...even when I don't do it I want to know what the hell it means when other people do  |
| |
|
| |
|
