https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international Poland    Contact            Users: 171 Active, 2 Logged in - Time: 04:50

Show hand : 866766

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Back Submit a hand   

Handnr: 866766
Submitted by : John Galt

PokerStars Game #51516067515: Holdem No Limit ($0.10/$0.25 USD) - 2010/10/22 20:19:56 ET
Table Semphyra III 9-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: waldi_one ($25 in chips)
Seat 2: a5a5a5a5 ($25.35 in chips)
Seat 3: mets2oo1 ($25 in chips)
Seat 4: D4NIP0KER ($25 in chips)
Seat 5: L3NGTHY ($30.63 in chips)
Seat 7: Hero ($42.41 in chips)
Seat 8: Thechoupix ($9.30 in chips)
Seat 9: sphockey ($25 in chips)
mets2oo1: posts small blind $0.10
D4NIP0KER: posts big blind $0.25

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero AcKs
L3NGTHY: folds
Hero: raises $0.75 to $1
Thechoupix: folds
sphockey: folds
waldi_one: raises $1.50 to $2.50
a5a5a5a5: folds
mets2oo1: folds
D4NIP0KER: folds
Hero: calls $1.50

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $5.35)

   9cQsKc
Hero: checks
waldi_one: bets $3
Hero: calls $3

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $11.35)

   9cQsKc3h
Hero: checks
waldi_one: bets $7.50
Hero: calls $7.50

River (Pot : $26.35)

   9cQsKc3hAd
Hero: checks
waldi_one: bets $12 and is all-in
Hero: calls $12

Showdown
waldi_one: shows QhQc (three of a kind, Queens)
Hero: shows AcKs (two pair, Aces and Kings)
waldi_one collected $48.35 from pot

Summary
Total pot $50.35 | Rake $2
Board  9cQsKc3hAd
Seat 1: waldi_one showed QhQc and won ($48.35) with three of a kind, Queens
Seat 2: a5a5a5a5 (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 3: mets2oo1 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: D4NIP0KER (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: L3NGTHY folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 7: Hero showed AcKs and lost with two pair, Aces and Kings
Seat 8: Thechoupix folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 9: sphockey folded before Flop (didnt bet)

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands
John Galt   Canada. Oct 23 2010 01:04. Posts 618

i have no clue what im doing tbh.
vs unknown....fold pre? vs reg?
4bet or fold? vs unknown? vs fish? vs reg?
i think my reasoning was 'calling down keeps his range wider'. really bad vs unknown? only do it against a specific light 3betting reg who is aggro?

Facebook Twitter
MaidenFan: Stop worrying about what might be or what coulda been, the former is totally out of your control, and the latter is nothing but a twisted fantasy 

vlseph   United States. Oct 23 2010 01:07. Posts 3026

i really hate playing OOP with AK, so i'd elect to 4b or fold preflop.
4bet vs aggressive regulars and fish easily, i'd rarely fold it except vs the tighest regs.
pending a good read if you had one, due to positions, you could easily snap fold AK vs the tighter players in this set up.

post flop... assuming you have a flop where you called, it was hopefully cause you thought villain was bluffing, so calling down would be better if you were still following that assumption.

The only hands a nit balances in his range are the nuts, the second nuts, and the third nuts. 

John Galt   Canada. Oct 23 2010 01:17. Posts 618

vs fish, 4bet get it in cuz its hard to play missed flop oop right?
vs aggressive regs, 4bet fold??
fold is standard now i think vs anyone like 12/9 or tighter <3% 3bet?

who can i assume is bluffing and c/c down? value owning myself against any one half decent?

MaidenFan: Stop worrying about what might be or what coulda been, the former is totally out of your control, and the latter is nothing but a twisted fantasy 

 

All hands submitted by John Galt:






Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap