https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international Poland    Contact            Users: 479 Active, 1 Logged in - Time: 22:55

Show hand : 427026

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Back Submit a hand   

Handnr: 427026
Submitted by : Baalim

PokerStars Game #16791088880: Hold'em No Limit ($3/$6) - 2008/04/17 - 07:50:37 (ET)
Table 'Laomedon V' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($764.60 in chips)
Seat 2: donkydynamit ($724.75 in chips)
Seat 3: redeye3030 ($1090 in chips)
Seat 4: Northern Tex ($154.20 in chips)
Seat 5: QuickStilz ($597 in chips)
Seat 6: banditos19 ($390 in chips)
QuickStilz: posts small blind $3
banditos19: posts big blind $6

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero 3c3h
Hero : raises $15 to $21
donkydynamit: folds
redeye3030: raises $45 to $66
Northern Tex: folds
QuickStilz: folds
banditos19: folds
Hero : calls $45

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $141.00)

   8h3d4h
Hero : checks
redeye3030: bets $102
Hero : raises $138 to $240
redeye3030: raises $784 to $1024 and is all-in
Hero : calls $458.60 and is all-in

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $1,538.20)

   8h3d4hAs

River (Pot : $1,538.20)

   8h3d4hAsTc

Showdown
Hero : shows 3c3h (three of a kind, Threes)
redeye3030: shows AhAc (three of a kind, Aces)
redeye3030 collected $1535.20 from pot
Hero said, "ugh"

Summary
Total pot $1538.20 | Rake $3
Board  8h3d4hAsTc
Seat 1: Hero showed 3c3h and lost with three of a kind, Threes
Seat 2: donkydynamit folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: redeye3030 showed AhAc and won ($1535.20) with three of a kind, Aces
Seat 4: Northern Tex (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: QuickStilz (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: banditos19 (big blind) folded before Flop

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands
lachlan   Australia. Apr 17 2008 05:57. Posts 6991

hey baal,

is it profitable to call his 3 bet preflop with 3's?

i thought it was a no no since u are not getting very good odds

however i noticed u are slightly deep so maybe that justifies it, can u fill me in on why u calleD?

Facebook Twitter
full ring 

Baalim   Mexico. Apr 17 2008 05:58. Posts 34250

his range is narrow and his 3-bet is small so my odds are good

Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online 

wobbly_au   Australia. Apr 17 2008 05:58. Posts 6540

what he is getting INSAnE odds to call pref

The Last Laugh. 

lachlan   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:07. Posts 6991

lol i just did some maths and EV calculations and you are right, its way +EV to call here, i didnt realise

Fold = $0
Call = -$45 * 7.5 + (794 * 1 * 0.85) + (-720 * 1 * 0.15)

= +$229.4 (assuming you stack him every time)

Assuming he has AA,KK and stacks 50% of the time, and has AK other 50% and u check/fold when u dont hit set:

(0.5 * -$45 * 7.5 + (794 * 1 * 0.85) + (-720 * 1 * 0.15) )+
(0.5 * -$45 * 7.5 + (98 + 102)

= +$229.4 + $29.25

= +$258.65 overall vs AK,KK,AA

free $250 bucks every time u call here vs that range, nice : )

full ringLast edit: 17/04/2008 06:18

MysticJoey   Poland. Apr 17 2008 06:12. Posts 1430

well its not that big because he have chances of hiting his own set just like here, but ye, still +Ev


PokerDoc88   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:13. Posts 3527

you should muck those 3s pre son, you should know the bullets are coming!

 Last edit: 17/04/2008 06:13

traktor   Czech Republic. Apr 17 2008 06:14. Posts 372


  On April 17 2008 05:07 lachlan wrote:
(assuming you stack him every time)




That is far from truth...


lachlan   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:15. Posts 6991


  On April 17 2008 05:12 MysticJoey wrote:
well its not that big because he have chances of hiting his own set just like here, but ye, still +Ev


yea true, fixed. being deep by 20% of so makes this easily profitable

full ring 

lachlan   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:16. Posts 6991


  On April 17 2008 05:14 traktor wrote:
Show nested quote +



That is far from truth...

yeah but im only assuming he's stacking off with AA or KK which even if its only a 50% chance he has its still way profitable to call

full ring 

Twisted    Netherlands. Apr 17 2008 06:19. Posts 10422

Calling 3bets with low PP's is spew except when it's deep and it's against a nit. Against a loose agressive player in 6max calling with a low PP preflop is spew because you only take his stack in big setup hands (which don't happen often) and most of the time you're gonna have to fold it.

This hand it's kinda iffy because it's 125bb deep and his reraise is under potsize. He's not getting ridiculous odds at all. This isn't FR where everyone who 3bets has QQ+ Wobbly.


wobbly_au   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:20. Posts 6540


  On April 17 2008 05:19 Twisted wrote:
Calling 3bets with low PP's is spew except when it's deep and it's against a nit. Against a loose agressive player in 6max calling with a low PP preflop is spew because you only take his stack in big setup hands (which don't happen often) and most of the time you're gonna have to fold it.

This hand it's kinda iffy because it's 125bb deep and his reraise is under potsize. He's not getting ridiculous odds at all. This isn't FR where everyone who 3bets has QQ+ Wobbly.


lol FR isnt that nitty yo

but u may be right. i dont know enuf about villains 3bet range to make a judgement.

The Last Laugh.Last edit: 17/04/2008 06:25

lachlan   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:21. Posts 6991


  On April 17 2008 05:19 Twisted wrote:
Calling 3bets with low PP's is spew except when it's deep and it's against a nit. Against a loose agressive player in 6max calling with a low PP preflop is spew because you only take his stack in big setup hands (which don't happen often) and most of the time you're gonna have to fold it.

This hand it's kinda iffy because it's 125bb deep and his reraise is under potsize. He's not getting ridiculous odds at all. This isn't FR where everyone who 3bets has QQ+ Wobbly.


hmm yeah you are right... hey what % of the time do u think he would have a hand he is stacking off with? i want to work out more EV

eg: what % does he have QQ KK AA here opposed to AK and other shit he is folding to the check raise

full ringLast edit: 17/04/2008 06:22

Twisted    Netherlands. Apr 17 2008 06:30. Posts 10422

I have no idea, totally depends on his PFR% and stuff, but I would generally only call people with 12% PFR or lower with low pp's.

Well yeah I made a generalization about FR, but I think most players that play there (? not solid regs) play like 12/9 right?


wobbly_au   Australia. Apr 17 2008 06:32. Posts 6540

yea they are either nits or super loose passive donks~ barring the TAGS

The Last Laugh. 

 

All hands submitted by Baalim:






Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap