|
|
 |
Show hand : 1071866 |
 |
Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1071866
Submitted by : pokercece
PokerStars Zoom Hand #165182239086: Omaha Pot Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2017/01/26 9:51:11 EET [2017/01/26 2:51:11 ET]
Table Aquarius Dwarf 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($45.59 in chips)
Seat 2: AshoNya ($241.18 in chips)
Seat 3: skyrokket1 ($11.90 in chips)
Seat 4: kverrulanto ($50.94 in chips)
Seat 5: Hone2709 ($84.02 in chips)
Seat 6: damiaodudu09 ($109.28 in chips)
AshoNya: posts small blind $0.25
skyrokket1: posts big blind $0.50
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero    
kverrulanto: raises $1.25 to $1.75
Hone2709: raises $2.75 to $4.50
damiaodudu09: calls $4.50
Hero: calls $4.50
AshoNya: folds
skyrokket1: calls $4
kverrulanto: raises $22.75 to $27.25
Hone2709: raises $56.77 to $84.02 and is all-in
damiaodudu09: folds
Hero: calls $41.09 and is all-in
skyrokket1: calls $7.40 and is all-in
kverrulanto: calls $23.69 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($33.08) returned to Hone2709
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $164.12)
  
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $164.12)
River (Pot : $164.12)
Showdown
kverrulanto: shows     (two pair, Queens and Eights)
Hone2709: shows     (a pair of Sevens)
kverrulanto collected $10.70 from side pot-2
Hero: shows (three of a kind, Jacks)
Hero collected $101.07 from side pot-1
skyrokket1: shows     (a pair of Jacks)
Hero collected $50.35 from main pot
Summary
Total pot $164.12 Main pot $50.35. Side pot-1 $101.07. Side pot-2 $10.70. | Rake $2
Board
Seat 1: Hero (button) showed and won ($151.42) with three of a kind, Jacks
Seat 2: AshoNya (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: skyrokket1 (big blind) showed and lost with a pair of Jacks
Seat 4: kverrulanto showed and won ($10.70) with two pair, Queens and Eights
Seat 5: Hone2709 showed and lost with a pair of Sevens
Seat 6: damiaodudu09 folded before Flop
 |
Comments |
 |
1
 |
pokercece Bulgaria. Jan 26 2017 09:13. Posts 2 | | |
50% eq in 4 way allin, not bad  |
|
| 1
 |
taco Iceland. Jan 30 2017 01:40. Posts 1793 | | |
He has 0.33 EV against 3 random hands and breaks even after rake against AA** + 2 random hands and does even worse against KK** + 2 random hands.
Since you only have 0.3 EV 3-way against aces and a random hand and the bigger stacks played it with more strength than the tiny stack this is basically just a bad play at worst and a swingy play at best. |
|
| 1
 |
YoMeR United States. Jan 31 2017 01:09. Posts 12435 | | |
lmao 4 way cram session and noone has AAxx.
looks like a great game ;D |
| |
|
| 1
 |
Stroggoz New Zealand. Jan 31 2017 13:06. Posts 5296 | | |
what are the highest winrates at plo50?? i read somewhere that it was impossible to beat it for a decent edge because it was a rakefest, but this was like 4-5years ago |
|
| One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings | |
|
| 1
|
taco Iceland. Feb 01 2017 03:17. Posts 1793 | | |
| | On January 31 2017 12:06 Stroggoz wrote:
what are the highest winrates at plo50?? i read somewhere that it was impossible to beat it for a decent edge because it was a rakefest, but this was like 4-5years ago |
There's always been players that beat PLO post-rakeback. You can put in so much fucking work in Omaha that is Omaha specific to gain an edge over someone who has only a few hundred thousand hands so imagine the edge against casuals.
Rake is disgusting though, when I played it was ~18-19bb/100 PLO25 | ~15-16bb/100 PLO50 | ~11-12 bb/100 PLO100 | 7-8bb/100 PLO200.
My advice would be to play $50 PLO or lower only as an investment towards improving. The hourly pay is atrocious even if you're already great at PLO and a Supernova. |
|
| | Last edit: 01/02/2017 03:18 |
|
| 4
 |
TianYuan  Korea (South). Feb 01 2017 11:45. Posts 6817 | | |
Well clearly these guys are all monkeys, but in general this is not a good cold call pre.
Your hand is suffering negative range interference from multiple tight ranges (UTG r, utg1 3b). In general hands with broadways or that need an ace to make a straight are not suitable cold calls unless they are otherwise perfect (i.e. QJT9ds OK, QJT9ss no).
But given the crap they showed down..... |
| |
|
| 1 | |
| | On January 30 2017 00:40 taco wrote:
He has 0.33 EV against 3 random hands and breaks even after rake against AA** + 2 random hands and does even worse against KK** + 2 random hands.
Since you only have 0.3 EV 3-way against aces and a random hand and the bigger stacks played it with more strength than the tiny stack this is basically just a bad play at worst and a swingy play at best. |
utg and Utg 1 should have a lot of range intereference like double AA. i think its not horrible but there are many better hands to go with. plo50 is basically a rake trap tho. 95% or more of ur winrate will go to stars |
|
| | Last edit: 03/02/2017 07:07 |
|
| 1
|
taco Iceland. Feb 05 2017 02:41. Posts 1793 | | |
| | On February 03 2017 06:01 traxamillion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 30 2017 00:40 taco wrote:
He has 0.33 EV against 3 random hands and breaks even after rake against AA** + 2 random hands and does even worse against KK** + 2 random hands.
Since you only have 0.3 EV 3-way against aces and a random hand and the bigger stacks played it with more strength than the tiny stack this is basically just a bad play at worst and a swingy play at best. |
utg and Utg 1 should have a lot of range intereference like double AA. i think its not horrible but there are many better hands to go with. plo50 is basically a rake trap tho. 95% or more of ur winrate will go to stars
|
That range interference coincides with things that worsen Hero's hand. Not in a minor way - in a major way.
|
|
| |
|
|
 Poker Streams | |
|
