Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1060022
Submitted by : LemOn[5thF]
PokerStars Hand #143511337629: Holdem No Limit ($0.25/$0.50 USD) - 2015/11/08 17:43:07 CET [2015/11/08 11:43:07 ET]
Table Odyssey II 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: ljl0922 ($32.49 in chips)
Seat 2: 2reac ($52.53 in chips)
Seat 3: Hero ($50 in chips)
Seat 4: GioTheGreat9 ($29.74 in chips)
Seat 5: lolava5 ($64.56 in chips)
Seat 6: luckyDinosau ($50.49 in chips)
2reac: posts small blind $0.25
Hero: posts big blind $0.50
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero  
GioTheGreat9: raises $1 to $1.50
lolava5: folds
luckyDinosau: folds
ljl0922: folds
2reac: folds
Hero: calls $1
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $3.25)
  
Hero: checks
GioTheGreat9: checks
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $3.25)
Hero: bets $2.35
GioTheGreat9: calls $2.35
River (Pot : $7.95)
Hero: checks
GioTheGreat9: bets $4.50
Hero: raises $41.65 to $46.15 and is all-in
GioTheGreat9: calls $21.39 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($20.26) returned to Hero
Showdown
Hero: shows (a straight, Three to Seven)
GioTheGreat9: shows   (two pair, Kings and Fours)
Hero collected $57.23 from pot
Summary
Total pot $59.73 | Rake $2.50
Board
Seat 1: ljl0922 (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: 2reac (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: Hero (big blind) showed and won ($57.23) with a straight, Three to Seven
Seat 4: GioTheGreat9 showed and lost with two pair, Kings and Fours
Seat 5: lolava5 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: luckyDinosau folded before Flop (didnt bet)
 |
Comments |
 |
1
 |
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Nov 08 2015 17:45. Posts 15163 | | | |
| |
|
| 1
 |
T8Suited Canada. Nov 09 2015 05:34. Posts 1276 | | |
what's your though process of checking river tho |
|
| 1
| 1
 |
bigredhoss Cook Islands. Nov 09 2015 10:36. Posts 8648 | | | |
| |
|
| 1
|
lebowski Greece. Nov 09 2015 12:26. Posts 9205 | | |
| | On November 09 2015 04:34 T8Suited wrote:
what's your though process of checking river tho |
clubs missed, 4x will bet, AK will bet or villain will try to rep it |
|
| new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
| 1
|
fira United States. Nov 09 2015 15:55. Posts 6345 | | |
nh wp
def bad river card for our range, so we are gonna be checking river a lot with SDV type hands. am a little conflicted about what hands we want to be check/shove bluffing tho... non-club giveups or something? |
|
| 1
| 1
|
Spitfiree Bulgaria. Nov 09 2015 22:46. Posts 9634 | | |
| | On November 09 2015 14:55 fira wrote:
nh wp
def bad river card for our range, so we are gonna be checking river a lot with SDV type hands. am a little conflicted about what hands we want to be check/shove bluffing tho... non-club giveups or something? |
how about none since this isnt 400nl ?
stop worrying about balance so much
sure theoretical discussion is great since you d have to progress as you move through limits, but practical implication of that at those stakes is pretty bad imo |
|
| | Last edit: 09/11/2015 22:47 |
|
| 1
|
fira United States. Nov 10 2015 23:57. Posts 6345 | | |
| | On November 09 2015 21:46 Spitfiree wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 09 2015 14:55 fira wrote:
nh wp
def bad river card for our range, so we are gonna be checking river a lot with SDV type hands. am a little conflicted about what hands we want to be check/shove bluffing tho... non-club giveups or something? |
how about none since this isnt 400nl ?
stop worrying about balance so much
sure theoretical discussion is great since you d have to progress as you move through limits, but practical implication of that at those stakes is pretty bad imo
|
idk i can only view poker through the lens of theory, i don't know how to approach it in any other way. what are u suggesting i do exactly? what is there to worry about if not balance? honestly i dont really think about the stakes i'm playing, i treat play money like high stakes and i don't get why the stakes are even relevant - what is more relevant is our opponents' strategies imo... its just assuming ppl will play a certain way simply because of the stakes they are playing, which is really silly consider we ourselves are playing those stakes as well!!
its weird, u are not the first to tell me to "stop worrying about balance so much," but when i read such a statement i don't know what to think, because to me poker is 100% about balance. i don't really think/worry about anything else when it comes to poker o.o
i also don't think practical application of theory can ever be "pretty bad," that would imply that the theory itself is inherently wrong. and i don't think there is anything wrong with having bluffs in a check/raise river range for this sizing, in fact i believe it would be quite awkward/exploitable if our range consisted purely of value hands. my mind can be changed in regards to this if presented a good argument for only having value hands in our shoving range here. but to challenge the notion that applying theory to practical play is unhelpful due to the stakes one plays seems, well, noobish ;p |
|
| | Last edit: 11/11/2015 00:19 |
|
| |
|
United States. Nov 09 2015 10:11. Posts 2355
