https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international Poland    Contact            Users: 443 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 14:28

Show hand : 1056433

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Back Submit a hand   

Handnr: 1056433
Submitted by : lebowski

PokerStars Zoom Hand #139164037255: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2015/08/09 15:04:39 ET
Table Triangulum 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: MacXone ($43.53 in chips)
Seat 2: Swingzue ($100 in chips)
Seat 3: Hero ($101.50 in chips)
Seat 4: zx6565 ($159.51 in chips)
Seat 5: cupur2011 ($108.10 in chips)
Seat 6: tomekpe ($197.36 in chips)
Swingzue: posts small blind $0.50
Hero: posts big blind $1

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero AcAd
zx6565: folds
cupur2011: raises $2 to $3
tomekpe: folds
MacXone: folds
Swingzue: folds
Hero: raises $7 to $10
cupur2011: calls $7

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $20.50)

   Td8c9c
Hero: checks
cupur2011: checks

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $20.50)

   Td8c9c7s
Hero: checks
cupur2011: checks

River (Pot : $20.50)

   Td8c9c7sQs
Hero: checks
cupur2011: bets $9.79
Hero: calls $9.79

Showdown
cupur2011: shows QcJc (a straight, Eight to Queen)
Hero: mucks hand
cupur2011 collected $38.28 from pot

Summary
Total pot $40.08 | Rake $1.80
Board  Td8c9c7sQs
Seat 1: MacXone (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: Swingzue (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: Hero (big blind) mucked AcAd
Seat 4: zx6565 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: cupur2011 showed QcJc and won ($38.28) with a straight, Eight to Queen
Seat 6: tomekpe folded before Flop (didnt bet)

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands
fira   United States. Aug 10 2015 06:03. Posts 6345

i think i like his play? good hand to balance his double check-backs

Facebook Twitter

dogmeat   Czech Republic. Aug 10 2015 08:09. Posts 6374

lol

ban baal 

ToT)MidiaN(    United Kingdom. Aug 10 2015 11:23. Posts 5070

I think his play is horrendous, pretty sure he should just bet flop 100% with the nuts. Why would he take his best value hand and use that to "balance" his weaker check backs, just seems like he's costing himself way too much EV in the betting part of the game tree to make a very small increase to the checking back part. I mean what's the thought process, that just because he can check back the nuts twice that it prevents us from bluffing him or something?

One day good. One day bad. And some days, even hope 

fira   United States. Aug 10 2015 13:43. Posts 6345

well, i think he needs some nuts in his check back range, and the best nuts hand to do it with is one with clubs, because it requires the least amount of protection. if he never checks back any kind of QJ then his check back range becomes capped on blanks - not a huge problem if stacks are shallow so i guess it's fine here, but if it was like 500 bb deep then we are going to be run into trouble when opponent overbets blanks because we never have nuts


dogmeat   Czech Republic. Aug 10 2015 15:24. Posts 6374


  On August 10 2015 12:43 fira wrote:
well, i think he needs some nuts in his check back range, and the best nuts hand to do it with is one with clubs, because it requires the least amount of protection. if he never checks back any kind of QJ then his check back range becomes capped on blanks - not a huge problem if stacks are shallow so i guess it's fine here, but if it was like 500 bb deep then we are going to be run into trouble when opponent overbets blanks because we never have nuts

no

ban baal 

Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Aug 10 2015 15:26. Posts 9634


  On August 10 2015 05:03 fira wrote:
i think i like his play? good hand to balance his double check-backs


wat


fira   United States. Aug 10 2015 17:09. Posts 6345


  On August 10 2015 14:24 dogmeat wrote:
no


well thats helpful.


  On August 10 2015 14:26 Spitfiree wrote:
Show nested quote +


wat

i explained my reasons... comment?

honestly i dont know why i post seriously here. there are some good posters but when i get troll comments like dogmeats its rather tilting. maybe i should leave.

 Last edit: 10/08/2015 17:20

lebowski   Greece. Aug 10 2015 17:27. Posts 9205

lol no man don't tilt
I enjoy reading your comments!!

new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... 

lebowski   Greece. Aug 10 2015 17:34. Posts 9205

these replies weren't even TalentedTom oldschool level of bashing
internet poker forum will probably always be aggro by default, keep commenting

new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... 

fira   United States. Aug 10 2015 17:37. Posts 6345

thanks.. u're obv one of the good posters here. just cant stand the ones that offer nothing and go around saying passive aggressive bullshit, its almost not worth discussing poker here. this doesnt really happen on other sites like RIO, i dont know why it happens here.

 Last edit: 10/08/2015 17:39

Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Aug 10 2015 18:08. Posts 9634

What do you think his calling range pre looks like? This board hits his range insanely well he probably shouldn't have a single hand that checks back here since there are rarely hands that don't have huge equity. Even if he does have xback range it still has good equity

Checking behind the nuts 2 times in a row with the nuts redraw in a 3bet pot is just insanely bad


fira   United States. Aug 11 2015 03:35. Posts 6345

why would he not have a single hand that checks back? he can check back whatever he wants... JTs... 97s... 66... QTs...

i guess the 2nd checkback is a bit unnecessary, he can bet the turn but i think the fact that we have the redraw makes it more of a checkback than not (at least on the flop). it would be bad to check back QJh imo but literally never checking back this board is not good, so if u have a checkback range u want it to be uncapped and this is THE hand to uncap that range


ToT)MidiaN(    United Kingdom. Aug 11 2015 11:03. Posts 5070

I ran it through Simple Postflop using the range I'd call the 3bet with (QQ-77, AQo+, ATs+, KQs, QJs, JTs, T9s) against a couple of different 3bet ranges, a linear one, which I used PokerSnowie's range for and a polarised one, which I used Janda's range from his book Applications of NLHE. Against the linear 3bet range that contains KQs we betall combos of QJs virtually 100% when checked to, against the polarised range that contains more suited connectors and flats pre with KQs instead of 3betting we're betting QJhh and QJss 100%, betting QJdd ~90% and ~QJcc 70%. I mention KQ as I imagine that protecting against KQ is one of the main reasons GTO bets 100% when villain has KQ and <100% with diamond and club combinations when it does not. That's what GTO does, but obviously we can't know both player's exact ranges or compute GTO in game, I think his play is a big mistake in real play.

Probably not massively surprising given the way the ranges are constructed preflop, but the 3bettor is checking 100% of his range with both the linear and polarised ranges on this flop

One day good. One day bad. And some days, even hope 

 

All hands submitted by lebowski:






Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap