PokerStars Hand #103085292892: Holdem No Limit ($3/$6 USD) - 2013/08/22 13:29:24 ET
Table Werra 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: Raikkoboy ($600 in chips)
Seat 4: Hero ($618 in chips)
MOOSQUAD joins the table at seat #2
Hero: posts small blind $3
Raikkoboy: posts big blind $6
Holecards
Dealt to Hero 
Hero: raises $12 to $18
Raikkoboy: raises $42 to $60
321letitrip joins the table at seat #5
Hero: calls $42
Flop (Pot : $120.00)
Raikkoboy: checks
Hero: bets $72
MOOSQUAD leaves the table
Raikkoboy: raises $468 to $540 and is all-in
Hero:
1
 |
YoMeR United States. Aug 22 2013 17:52. Posts 12435 | | |
what kinda range you thinking you're up against here? Seems like a fold almost always without a damn good reason |
| |
|
|
1
 |
drone666 Brasil. Aug 22 2013 18:17. Posts 1821 | | |
villain dependant
we need to have 44% equity vs his range, so if he's well balanced between overpairs/overcards you should be calling |
|
| Dont listen to anything I say | |
|
|
1
|
MARSHALL28 United States. Aug 22 2013 19:49. Posts 1897 | | |
ya i b/f all day. i think pre is a bit loose also |
|
|
1
 |
TheHuHu3 United States. Aug 22 2013 20:37. Posts 5544 | | |
Phil Ivey would check here. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
Fraser Canada. Aug 23 2013 03:29. Posts 4605 | | |
| | On August 22 2013 17:17 drone666 wrote:
villain dependant
we need to have 44% equity vs his range, so if he's well balanced between overpairs/overcards you should be calling |
Is this correct? I'm pretty rusty at these calculations but we're getting over 1.5:1 on the call, wouldn't that make 40% equity a +ev call?
I would usually call here..not sure if its right. |
|
|
1
|
Fraser Canada. Aug 23 2013 03:34. Posts 4605 | | |
I mean, if my math is right, its almost a call if he shows us KK... Sure we could be in worse shape, but I also think we're flipping often vs 2overs+ FD or 2 overs+ oesd. Seems close, so i call and take the variance. |
|
|
|
