https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international Poland    Contact            Users: 323 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 14:40

Show hand : 1003180

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Back Submit a hand   

Handnr: 1003180
Submitted by : longple

PokerStars Hand #94623855184: Holdem No Limit ($5/$10 USD) - 2013/02/25 12:05:26 ET
Table Natalie IV 6-max Seat #3 is the button
Seat 1: longple ($3783.37 in chips)
Seat 2: slv458 ($1813.73 in chips)
Seat 3: Rednaxela747 ($1186.03 in chips)
Seat 4: ivanildo ($1093 in chips)
Seat 5: Dr. Muck You ($1035.02 in chips)
Seat 6: zazano ($1419.76 in chips)
ivanildo: posts small blind $5
Dr. Muck You: posts big blind $10
longple: posts the ante $2
slv458: posts the ante $2
Rednaxela747: posts the ante $2
ivanildo: posts the ante $2
Dr. Muck You: posts the ante $2
zazano: posts the ante $2

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to longple 4s4c
zazano: folds
longple: raises $20 to $30
slv458: folds
Rednaxela747: folds
ivanildo: folds
Dr. Muck You: raises $75 to $105
longple: calls $75

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $215.00)

   Ad4dTh
Dr. Muck You: checks
longple: bets $115
Dr. Muck You: calls $115

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $445.00)

   Ad4dThKc
Dr. Muck You: checks
longple: bets $200
Dr. Muck You: calls $200

River (Pot : $845.00)

   Ad4dThKcAh
Dr. Muck You: checks
longple: bets $855
Dr. Muck You: calls $613.02 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($241.98) returned to longple

Showdown
longple: shows 4s4c (a full house, Fours full of Aces)
Dr. Muck You: shows QcQd (two pair, Aces and Queens)
longple collected $2080.04 from pot

Summary
Total pot $2083.04 | Rake $3
Board  Ad4dThKcAh
Seat 1: longple showed 4s4c and won ($2080.04) with a full house, Fours full of Aces
Seat 2: slv458 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 3: Rednaxela747 (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 4: ivanildo (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: Dr. Muck You (big blind) showed QcQd and lost with two pair, Aces and Queens
Seat 6: zazano folded before Flop (didnt bet)

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands
rememp   Canada. Feb 25 2013 13:11. Posts 480

What can he beat that you play this way? 2 diamonds right? But then you have the k of diamonds in a lot of hands you call the 3 bet with.

I don't get it.

Facebook Twitter

longple    Sweden. Feb 25 2013 13:20. Posts 4472

i guess he only puts me on 2 combos of ATs and that i wont valuebet AJ AQ QJ and maybe not even TT or have AK since uor dynamic is kinda loose, + that he might think i fold 44 pre/dont valuebet it

this hand might look standard, i think it was pretty interesting

against most guys i will ch back river, but i think this guy is very likely to ch/jamm AK KK on the turn aswell as be sceptic against me and make some random call/be kinda capped and feel the need to call

its nice when ur reads are correct

 Last edit: 25/02/2013 13:22

eestwood   United Kingdom. Feb 25 2013 13:45. Posts 698

is it standard for you to call 10bb 3bets 100bb deep with low ppairs IP or it's player dependant ? or only at the deep ante tables?

can we all ball 

longple    Sweden. Feb 25 2013 14:26. Posts 4472

yea i fold against most regs, even at antetables, but vs this guy i call most of the time against 10.5bb cuz i feel like hes gonna do stupid shit like this more often when i hit, he is kinda spazzy and sceptic


rememp   Canada. Feb 25 2013 14:51. Posts 480


  On February 25 2013 12:20 longple wrote:
i guess he only puts me on 2 combos of ATs and that i wont valuebet AJ AQ QJ and maybe not even TT or have AK since uor dynamic is kinda loose, + that he might think i fold 44 pre/dont valuebet it

this hand might look standard, i think it was pretty interesting

against most guys i will ch back river, but i think this guy is very likely to ch/jamm AK KK on the turn aswell as be sceptic against me and make some random call/be kinda capped and feel the need to call

its nice when ur reads are correct



Longple can you explain why you check behind against most people here? Doesn't he have AQ and AJ a lot as well with his line? Or are most people folding that to jams?


longple    Sweden. Feb 25 2013 15:04. Posts 4472

dont think they have AQ AJ in their range against EP at a 100% rate, when they call turn i think they just have KK or AK alot since
theres not to much i can bluff with, i have to have like 99 or JJ or KQs and decide to continue bluffing on the turn, or bluff with JTs, people ch/call their entire range in these spots since their range is so narrow 3betting blinds vs EP, to protect their KK QQ hands, they will ch AK AA aswell

alot of people do atleast come preperad here when they continue to the river, and since they are so protected with those nutted hands im not sure if they feel like they have to bluffcatch with their AJ 3bet bluffs

i might be wrong tho, but thats what i feel about most nits here

i shouldnt say i would check against most regs i guess, there are plenty regs actually i would jamm here against expecting them to have more Ax that wont fold

edit:
i just feel like i look pretty strong here good player vs good player, i can have AK TT QJs ATs myself that i think they might assume me to valuebet with, idk how other regs feel about this spot but im not superhappy bluffing here 3 streets atleast hopeing bestcase scenario that he might have AQ AJ and fold when i got 99 or KQs

 Last edit: 25/02/2013 15:11

rememp   Canada. Feb 25 2013 15:08. Posts 480


  On February 25 2013 14:04 longple wrote:
dont think they have AQ AJ in their range against EP at a 100% rate, when they call turn i think they just have KK or AK alot since
theres not to much i can bluff with, i have to have like 99 or JJ or KQs and decide to continue bluffing on the turn, or bluff with JTs, people ch/call their entire range in these spots since their range is so narrow 3betting blinds vs EP, to protect their KK QQ hands, they will ch AK AA aswell

alot of people do atleast come preperad here when they continue to the river, and since they are so protected with those nutted hands im not sure if they feel like they have to bluffcatch with their AJ 3bet bluffs

i might be wrong tho, but thats what i feel about most nits here

i shouldnt say i would check against most regs i guess, there are plenty regs actually i would jamm here against expecting them to have more Ax that wont fold


i just feel like i look pretty strong here good player vs good player, i can have AK TT QJs ATs myself that i think they might assume me to valuebet with, idk how other regs feel about this spot but im not superhappy bluffing here atleast hopeing that he might have AQ and fold



thanks longple appreciate the quick response.


longple    Sweden. Feb 25 2013 15:17. Posts 4472

in before andrewsong calls me a nit and that he snapvaluebets AJ here cuz he has three of the same putting villain on weak Ax or QQ everytime

or tom saying villain cant call with worse

 Last edit: 25/02/2013 15:26

AndrewSong    United States. Feb 26 2013 02:12. Posts 2355

Lol nah bro ur the crazy1, I'd check back here more often then bet


 

All hands submitted by longple:






Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap