https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international Poland    Contact            Users: 441 Active, 2 Logged in - Time: 02:53

Show hand : 1000297

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Back Submit a hand   

Handnr: 1000297
Submitted by : longple

***** Hand History for Game 93214145915 ***** Poker Stars
$600.00 USD NL Texas Hold'em - Wednesday, January 30, 07:59:21 ET 2013
Table Perseus III Real Money
Seat 6 is the button
Seat 1: yenomrtgllwi $827.40 USD
Seat 2: longple $1502.70 USD
Seat 3: ausem $1052.60 USD
Seat 5: LetPlayGirls $2258.90 USD
Seat 6: BastianX $1955.50 USD
yenomrtgllwi posts small blind [$3.00 USD].
longple posts big blind [$6.00 USD].
yenomrtgllwi posts ante of [$1.20 USD].
longple posts ante of [$1.20 USD].
ausem posts ante of [$1.20 USD].
LetPlayGirls posts ante of [$1.20 USD].
BastianX posts ante of [$1.20 USD].

Holecards
Dealt to longple [QdKc ]
ausem folds
LetPlayGirls folds
BastianX raises [$15.00 USD]
yenomrtgllwi folds
longple raises [$48.00 USD]
BastianX calls [$39.00 USD]

Flop (Pot : $105.00)

   KhJs9h
longple checks
BastianX bets [$84.00 USD]
longple calls [$84.00 USD]

Turn (Pot : $273.00)

   KhJs9h2h
longple checks
BastianX bets [$210.00 USD]
longple calls [$210.00 USD]

River (Pot : $693.00)

   KhJs9h2h7d
longple checks
BastianX bets [$1606.30 USD]
longple calls [$1153.50 USD]
BastianX wins $452.80 USD
BastianX shows TdAd
longple shows QdKc
longple wins $3009.20 USD from main pot

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands
longple    Sweden. Jan 30 2013 08:04. Posts 4472

confirmed station

Facebook Twitter

kingpowa   France. Jan 30 2013 09:27. Posts 1525

But you did not lead this time, you must have had a draw !
indeed, you had

edit: missread it, you 3bet pf, unlike previous hand.

sorry for shitty english.Last edit: 30/01/2013 09:28

LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Jan 30 2013 09:43. Posts 15163

ye like you planned on folding when you checked le flop

93% Sure!  

the cleaner   Germany. Jan 30 2013 10:29. Posts 3014

nice hand. what would you do with KT ? x/c,x/c,x/f ?

there are no facts only interpretations 

gebbstet   Sweden. Jan 30 2013 11:14. Posts 391


  On January 30 2013 09:29 the cleaner wrote:
nice hand. what would you do with KT ? x/c,x/c,x/f ?



Isnt KT pretty much the same exact hand as KQ in this spot?


the cleaner   Germany. Jan 30 2013 11:26. Posts 3014

KT looses to KQ and i think that KQ is like pretty much the top of our range here to take that line, so we could balance it by calling down most of the time with KQ and folding KT most of the time here.

there are no facts only interpretations 

MARSHALL28   United States. Jan 30 2013 11:59. Posts 1897

if u plan on c/c all the way down, why not use a weaker made hand like a 9 to do so and just value bet this one on the flop?

personally i chk the flop 100% w/ this hand, but i also don't call down here.


gebbstet   Sweden. Jan 30 2013 12:15. Posts 391


  On January 30 2013 10:26 the cleaner wrote:
KT looses to KQ and i think that KQ is like pretty much the top of our range here to take that line, so we could balance it by calling down most of the time with KQ and folding KT most of the time here.



yeah KT looses to KQ but there is 0.0001% chance that the opponent has KQ here


longple    Sweden. Jan 30 2013 12:31. Posts 4472


  On January 30 2013 10:59 MARSHALL28 wrote:
if u plan on c/c all the way down, why not use a weaker made hand like a 9 to do so and just value bet this one on the flop?

personally i chk the flop 100% w/ this hand, but i also don't call down here.



Cuz i didnt have 9x this time. I dont construct my ranges static like you and u know this already by now dont you?

KT and KQ are both bluffcatchers on the river in this spot so they are basically the same here vs this guy


the cleaner   Germany. Jan 30 2013 12:52. Posts 3014


  On January 30 2013 11:15 gebbstet wrote:
Show nested quote +



yeah KT looses to KQ but there is 0.0001% chance that the opponent has KQ here


why can't villain value bet KQ here ? I suggested calling most of the time with KQ, since we need to ch/call all 3 streets with some part of our range and folding KT and other weaker part of our range.

there are no facts only interpretations 

gebbstet   Sweden. Jan 30 2013 13:16. Posts 391


  On January 30 2013 11:52 the cleaner wrote:
Show nested quote +



why can't villain value bet KQ here ? I suggested calling most of the time with KQ, since we need to ch/call all 3 streets with some part of our range and folding KT and other weaker part of our range.



you think he valuebets almost x2pot with KQ here? I dont


the cleaner   Germany. Jan 30 2013 13:22. Posts 3014

i didn't noticed that villain overbet river. i thought it was a normal size bet on the river. yea i agree, don't expect him to bet that size on river. i would fold

there are no facts only interpretationsLast edit: 30/01/2013 13:23

 

All hands submitted by longple:






Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap