https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international Poland    Contact            Users: 431 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 11:23

Show hand : 1000085

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Back Submit a hand   

Handnr: 1000085
Submitted by : Joeingram1

PokerStars Hand #93095084981: Omaha Pot Limit ($2/$4 USD) - 2013/01/28 7:34:31 CET [2013/01/28 1:34:31 ET]
Table Peneleos II 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 2: JoeIngram1 ($1695.90 in chips)
Seat 3: kimble83 ($400 in chips)
Seat 4: foldngst8n ($323.20 in chips)
Seat 5: naka82 ($190.03 in chips)
Seat 6: conejin_20 ($240 in chips)
naka82: posts small blind $2
conejin_20: posts big blind $4

Holecards
Dealt to JoeIngram1 JsQsAs5h
JoeIngram1: raises $8.80 to $12.80
kimble83: calls $12.80
foldngst8n: calls $12.80
naka82: calls $10.80
conejin_20: folds

Flop (Pot : $55.20)

   Jh2s3s
naka82: checks
JoeIngram1: bets $38
rex dex dean joins the table at seat #1
kimble83: raises $82 to $120
foldngst8n: folds
naka82: raises $57.23 to $177.23 and is all-in
JoeIngram1:

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands
TianYuan    Korea (South). Jan 28 2013 02:12. Posts 6817

Hard to give an answer without knowing anything about the other two, but I think it's a get in.

I gave kimble a fairly tight cold calling range, but I'm tbh not entirely sure what peoples cc of UTG opens UTG1 look like.... Eitherway, can post the range I assigned if you want but after accounting for the premium 4%~ish 3betting hands it came out to 6.76% of hands. I gave him a flop raising range of JJ, 22, 33, Wraps+spades, KJ** with K hi spades, J45:ss and K45:ss [he should barely ever have either of these I think], and J3 w spades.

I don't know if Naka is a fish or a shorstacker, but I gave him 20% of hands minus AA, and a shoving range on flop of 2pr+, pair+FD, naked K high spades, 456, 45 spades.

Vs these two you have 36% 3 way, and 50% against kimble. If we tighten up the shortstacks range to remove K:ss, your equity actually improves to 38.8%. Likewise if we remove the random 2X, 3X spades hands.

Facebook Twitter
Hm.. Off-suite socks.. 

TianYuan    Korea (South). Jan 28 2013 02:15. Posts 6817

Even if we were to narrow Kimble down to {A45:ss,456:ss,JJ} you have 32% 3 way and 40.5% against Kimble. Without the gutshot and the jack it's a clear fold.

Hm.. Off-suite socks..Last edit: 28/01/2013 02:16

TianYuan    Korea (South). Jan 28 2013 02:26. Posts 6817

Or are you asking if it's better to flat since kimble cant re-open betting?

Hm.. Off-suite socks.. 

TianYuan    Korea (South). Jan 28 2013 02:45. Posts 6817

Plugged in numbers to make sure...

If Kimble can't have KK /w spades, we should fold, otherwise we should get in. Unless i fucked up somewhere.

Actually a bit surprised, thought it would be a get in regardless.

Hm.. Off-suite socks..Last edit: 28/01/2013 02:48

Joeingram1   United States. Jan 28 2013 03:37. Posts 943

thanks for responses Tian


kimble plays pretty tight and naka is bigger fish in the game


I kinda posted this just mid session to remember it for later, i like your range breakdown for him, naka i mean his range is like who the fk knows really, sometimes these type of fish see so much money in the pot and just auto jam any draw but kimble its always basically top/mid set, KKxxss and sometimes KJxxss

The first 2 bit harder to have because of J blocker and not a bunch of 33x hands in range but it always is one of these 4 hands

Don't really think any reason to just flat here although when you mention it maybe? I think with extra fish money in always have to get it in

 Last edit: 28/01/2013 03:37

 

All hands submitted by Joeingram1:






Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap