Continuing my loss

Wow. .that sounds fucking awful dude. Hope things work out for you.

Good that you know that whining is bad

Crying because of variance when you have bazillion things in your game to improve (as 100% micro and low stakes players do) sucks -.-

awful bankroll management if you managed to lose 90% of your roll.

high five, lets see who can sink to nl 5 first!

Somehow I don't think rakeback will take you from nl10 to nl50...

On February 07 2010 18:54 mikeymoo wrote: Somehow I don't think rakeback will take you from nl10 to nl50...

well if he lost like 1k going from nl50 -> nl10 and recieving 1k ish in rakeback he can get back to 50nl straight after he gets the rb?

On February 07 2010 18:21 joLin wrote: awful bankroll management if you managed to lose 90% of your roll.

Played 50nl 'till I had to move down to 25nl, played that 'till I had to move down again, so no, I had a 20BI rule (As in, if I only have 20 BIs for the lower level, I moved down.) When I'm moving up I'll go with winning 20 BIs at 10nl and 25nl before I move up to 50nl though, feels silly to not get a solid run back up again.

Thinking about it, I have withdrawn a few hundred during last week, so I guess it's not all losses.

On February 07 2010 19:08 longple wrote: Show nested quote + On February 07 2010 18:54 mikeymoo wrote: Somehow I don't think rakeback will take you from nl10 to nl50... well if he lost like 1k going from nl50 -> nl10 and recieving 1k ish in rakeback he can get back to 50nl straight after he gets the rb?

This.

Don't like the bankroll management xD I follow 50, and I'm thinking about increasing it lol, feels nice. Wee xD

"Can't win with top sets in 3bet pots"
This alone tells me you have major leaks in your game that a 50nl reg should not have. Be honest with yourself as well, you're not helping your game out by being in denial of how you are really playing.

On February 07 2010 19:08 longple wrote: Show nested quote + On February 07 2010 18:54 mikeymoo wrote: Somehow I don't think rakeback will take you from nl10 to nl50... well if he lost like 1k going from nl50 -> nl10 and recieving 1k ish in rakeback he can get back to 50nl straight after he gets the rb?

you totally didnt get the point he means is just stupid if you dropped 2 limits to go back to the limit it drop you thats super dumb i am rolled for 400NL you dont see me there just cause i am rolled understand? Learn the game you guys otherwise you will never make a living and you will be waisting serious time

pardon my friend but you are acting like a child please learn the game and accept your errors like we all do when we fall

On February 07 2010 19:14 Rocketshiptrip wrote: Show nested quote + On February 07 2010 18:21 joLin wrote: awful bankroll management if you managed to lose 90% of your roll. Played 50nl 'till I had to move down to 25nl, played that 'till I had to move down again, so no, I had a 20BI rule (As in, if I only have 20 BIs for the lower level, I moved down.) When I'm moving up I'll go with winning 20 BIs at 10nl and 25nl before I move up to 50nl though, feels silly to not get a solid run back up again. Thinking about it, I have withdrawn a few hundred during last week, so I guess it's not all losses.

this is pretty thin as far as BRM goes. if youre moving down when you have 20 bi for the lower level, youre basically moving down when youve lost half of your roll?

It should't be like that i mean you should move down whenever you don't feel uncomfortable