https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 661 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 23:56

Stats check

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Forum Index > Poker Blogs
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Dec 25 2009 18:52. Posts 15163
Didn't do this in a while,

Please see above and look for stats that you have different and why would that be.
They are only basic ones, I just want to confirm that I am roughly on the right track.

Small sample, only December NL50-NL100 as my game is constantly evolving and I have watched a ton of vids end November (so winnings will be pretty much irrelevant)


Is it worth it to start looking for good river bluff spots at NL100 apart from obvious 3 barrels, or should I study more on this topic once I start taking shots at NL200?


0 votes
Facebook Twitter
93% Sure!  

LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Dec 25 2009 19:00. Posts 15163

Calling in sb too much maybe?

Or do you guys think that the difference of 6% can be caused just by completing?

93% Sure!  

RICHI8   United States. Dec 25 2009 20:31. Posts 1341

bigger sample plz.

also loosen up in btn and co.

 Last edit: 25/12/2009 20:32

ToT)MidiaN(    United Kingdom. Dec 28 2009 19:16. Posts 5070

The gap between my PFR for each position is much larger, for instance I think UTG is like 18%, next spot like 24% next spot like 34% and button like 50% or something, Similar story with my CCPF stats, 2 off the button is really low, it's a bit more on the cutoff and a bit more still on the button. My 3bet numbers also differ more via position whereas yours seem a little static and don't change that much for positions. My 3bet on the button is > CO by a significant margin, my CO 3bet is > 3bet from HJ, my 3bets from the blinds are more than from every other position as yours are, but SB > BB since I don't mind calling BB v BTN sometimes but rarely call SB v BTN cause the chance of being squeezed or even having to see a multiway pot with worst position isn't a good result either

One day good. One day bad. And some days, even hope 

LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Dec 28 2009 19:25. Posts 15163


  On December 28 2009 18:16 ToT)MidiaN( wrote:
The gap between my PFR for each position is much larger, for instance I think UTG is like 18%, next spot like 24% next spot like 34% and button like 50% or something, Similar story with my CCPF stats, 2 off the button is really low, it's a bit more on the cutoff and a bit more still on the button. My 3bet numbers also differ more via position whereas yours seem a little static and don't change that much for positions. My 3bet on the button is > CO by a significant margin, my CO 3bet is > 3bet from HJ, my 3bets from the blinds are more than from every other position as yours are, but SB > BB since I don't mind calling BB v BTN sometimes but rarely call SB v BTN cause the chance of being squeezed or even having to see a multiway pot with worst position isn't a good result either



Wow thanks for this Midian.

I think that my stats are so gay because I am a huge bumhunter/I never play without huge fish at the table and the regs.

I think its time to stay with <40tables and battle the regs with the stats you explained.

93% Sure!  

ToT)MidiaN(    United Kingdom. Jan 01 2010 22:43. Posts 5070



Played last month. Didn't put many hours in, and sample size is very very small but a general idea of "positional awareness" where can see a very clear loosening up for each position. The gaps between your numbers are far smaller.

One day good. One day bad. And some days, even hope 

ToT)MidiaN(    United Kingdom. Jan 01 2010 22:46. Posts 5070

FWIW just trying to emulate x stats is not really going to help you improve so don't sweat it too much, but definitely try to keep in mind that position is more valuable than you're currently giving it credit for. If I was playing optimal I think that my UTG VPIP and PFR would be smaller than it is and my BTN VPIP and PFR would be higher than it is there, but that may be due to small sample size. Also my blind winrates are generally less bad than this, probably due to small sample size also.

One day good. One day bad. And some days, even hope 

LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Jan 02 2010 08:37. Posts 15163


  On January 01 2010 21:46 ToT)MidiaN( wrote:
FWIW just trying to emulate x stats is not really going to help you improve so don't sweat it too much, but definitely try to keep in mind that position is more valuable than you're currently giving it credit for. If I was playing optimal I think that my UTG VPIP and PFR would be smaller than it is and my BTN VPIP and PFR would be higher than it is there, but that may be due to small sample size. Also my blind winrates are generally less bad than this, probably due to small sample size also.


Yeah I have watched some of Galfond's vids and I was folding too many hands IP when fish or weak players were in the blinds/ raised before me.

I'll look at more spots to steal, its unbelieveable how many trash hands can be profitable against the right villains.

The fact that I play with fish should actually make my steal% higher than not

93% Sure! Last edit: 02/01/2010 08:41

 



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2025. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap