how to play the bully

***** Hand History for Game 15428888558 ***** (Full Tilt)
$25.00 USD NL Texas Hold'em - Sunday, October 18, 07:31:31 ET 2009
Table Express (6 max) (Real Money)
Seat 5 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ( $26.10 USD )
Seat 2: aaamillertime ( $37.04 USD )
Seat 3: sergey7725 ( $25.00 USD )
Seat 4: Lacreamae ( $42.73 USD )
Seat 5: NixonTheGrouch ( $25.00 USD )
Seat 6: Daugaard36 ( $50.34 USD )
Daugaard36 posts small blind $0.10 USD.
Hero posts big blind $0.25 USD.

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero
aaamillertime calls $0.25 USD
sergey7725 folds
Lacreamae calls $0.25 USD
NixonTheGrouch folds
Daugaard36 calls $0.15 USD
Hero raises $1.75 USD
aaamillertime calls $1.75 USD
Lacreamae calls $1.75 USD
Daugaard36 folds

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $5.50)

   
Hero checks
aaamillertime bets $2.75 USD
Lacreamae folds
Hero calls $2.75 USD

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $11.00)

   
Hero checks
aaamillertime bets $7.00 USD
Hero raises $21.35 USD
aaamillertime calls $14.35 USD
Hero shows,
aaamillertime shows,

River (Pot : $53.70)

   
Hero wins $51.73 USD from main pot

***** Hand History for Game 15429159611 ***** (Full Tilt)
$25.00 USD NL Texas Hold'em - Sunday, October 18, 07:44:37 ET 2009
Table Mohave (6 max) (Real Money)
Seat 1 is the button
Seat 1: MrPoko ( $4.90 USD )
Seat 2: melikepow ( $27.01 USD )
Seat 3: kingtobey ( $41.24 USD )
Seat 4: T-REZ63 ( $32.29 USD )
Seat 5: Hero ( $34.26 USD )
Seat 6: La Srise ( $47.74 USD )
kingtobey posts small blind $0.10 USD.
T-REZ63 posts big blind $0.25 USD.

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero
Hero raises $1.00 USD
La Srise folds
MrPoko folds
kingtobey folds
T-REZ63 calls $0.75 USD

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $2.10)

   
T-REZ63 checks
Hero bets $1.75 USD
T-REZ63 calls $1.75 USD

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $5.60)

   
T-REZ63 checks
Hero checks

River (Pot : $5.60)

   
T-REZ63 bets $29.54 USD
Hero calls $29.54 USD
T-REZ63 shows,
Hero shows,
Hero wins $61.68 USD from main pot

0 votes

fancy play syndrome

you played both badly, villian just played them worse

On October 18 2009 19:50 Vivi57 wrote: you played both badly, villian just played them worse

+1 lol

no cbet on hand 1?

How is winning with strong hands being a bully?

this is the type of play that tilts me so hard. checking flop on first, checking turn on second and then calling the river.

TILT

this is nothing special....first hand the guy limp called 7x the bb from utg with J4s lol....he WANTED to get stacked....hand 2 u just got a good hand against a good hand and ur hand held....if ur up against a fd in that hand and it hits on the river ur prolly getting stacked lol...i dont like the way u played either.....

i agree with vivi57 above

both this villains were running over the table raising, reraising and shoving everywhere
almost never folding and betting 100% of their ranges when checked to then
might be fancy play syndrome tho

On October 18 2009 19:52 NewbSaibot wrote: How is winning with strong hands being a bully?

I'm not the bully
villains are

On October 18 2009 20:04 Etherone wrote: this is the type of play that tilts me so hard. checking flop on first, checking turn on second and then calling the river. TILT

I guess I should've fold river then... he could have 44

On October 18 2009 19:52 TremendousGats wrote: Show nested quote + On October 18 2009 19:50 Vivi57 wrote: you played both badly, villian just played them worse +1 lol no cbet on hand 1?

why I'm gonna cbet a dry flop if I know villain is gonna bet 2 streets at least if I check to him?

On October 18 2009 20:16 biabiaflexer wrote: this is nothing special....first hand the guy limp called 7x the bb from utg with J4s lol....he WANTED to get stacked....hand 2 u just got a good hand against a good hand and ur hand held....if ur up against a fd in that hand and it hits on the river ur prolly getting stacked lol...i dont like the way u played either..... i agree with vivi57 above

for christ sake
villain is a bully, a flushdraw is part of his range but I know he is NEVER gonna give me credit for ANYTHING on that flop and is gonna float me with 100% of his range
checking turn is so good against him cause it looks like I cbet/give up cause I don't have and A
I was 100% sure he was gonna overbet river if I checked turn, no matter the card that would hit the river if he didn't shove I would shove over his overbet

edit: my hand held? his hands was actually better pf... and how can his hand be ever considered a good hand on that board? LOL

On October 18 2009 19:36 collegesucks wrote: fancy play syndrome

yeah I guess

On October 18 2009 19:50 Vivi57 wrote: you played both badly, villian just played them worse

actually I think I played then close to perfection given the great reads I had

On October 18 2009 20:45 tutz_x wrote: Show nested quote + On October 18 2009 19:50 Vivi57 wrote: you played both badly, villian just played them worse actually I think I played then close to perfection given the great reads I had

honestly we don't know the reads you had nor what the flow of the game was, and as such you may be right, however i feel in common situations the way you played that hand wouldn't be what i consider optimal.

and i was suggesting you raise that river but i didn't realize he all-ined

On October 18 2009 21:14 Etherone wrote: Show nested quote + On October 18 2009 20:45 tutz_x wrote:   On October 18 2009 19:50 Vivi57 wrote: you played both badly, villian just played them worse actually I think I played then close to perfection given the great reads I had honestly we don't know the reads you had nor what the flow of the game was, and as such you may be right, however i feel in common situations the way you played that hand wouldn't be what i consider optimal. and i was suggesting you raise that river but i didn't realize he all-ined

yeah, in normal situations this plays are not good at all
but like I said, given the reads I had I think I played well

well, were you expecting them to fold had you played it differently? These villains werent really bluffing in their eyes, in reality they were just playing badly. Basically what you did was most likely totally unnecessary to win their money.

On October 18 2009 22:20 NewbSaibot wrote: well, were you expecting them to fold had you played it differently? These villains werent really bluffing in their eyes, in reality they were just playing badly. Basically what you did was most likely totally unnecessary to win their money.

hand 1 I dunno, probably a stack off anyway but I couldn't know how strong was his hand... by the was he was playing he could be double barring with total air so I thought that was the best was to play the hand
hand 2 villain was so so so bully that I'm absolut sure I wouldn't stack him off if I had played the hand any differently