Waste

lol that redline is fucking ridicilous haha

heh I hear ya, I had a couple sessions of experimenting down at nl100 with playing 80/65 , did not go to well and now I have that ugly redness in my pretty graphs dont think ill torture myself to get it up tho lol

red line

HOLY SHIT @ red line

Nothing but the best. Can't wait to catch up =)

lol my yeargraph before I quit



fml

I know this site is obsessed with the red line, however I think that at mid-stakes such as NL100-NL200, having a crazy red line hurts your bottom line since the style of play at those stakes is more suited to being beaten with solid ABC TAG game than a fancy LAG style that relies on your opponents folding a lot of better hands. I am not at all surprised that you find the style of play that worked for you at higher stakes not generating great results at mid-stakes.

Another thing I am going to point out involves some guessing on my part. I assume that you play a lot more tables at NL100 than at the higher stakes you are used to (can't really see you grinding 8-12 tables of NL2000). LAG style requires a lot more careful analysis than ABC TAG, and when you add so many more tables, I would guess that the quality of reads and analysis that you are able to perform decreases greatly. It has been my experience that LAG grinders playing 8+ tables at NL100-NL400 are some of the most profitable people to play against after the obvious fish.

Just my 2c. I know LP is a big fan of LAG play and I am basically blaspheming against all that is holy on this site, but it's just so damn easy to exploit LAG grinders....

only your own video-making incompetence to blame really. why, oh why, didn't you do a few test runs of 1-2 mins long. /troll

anyways, great to hear about how you're doing! delicious bloggage

I generally play 4 tables at higher stakes but only 6 at 100nl so shouldn't make that much difference

On May 14 2009 04:54 phexac wrote: I know this site is obsessed with the red line, however I think that at mid-stakes such as NL100-NL200, having a crazy red line hurts your bottom line since the style of play at those stakes is more suited to being beaten with solid ABC TAG game than a fancy LAG style that relies on your opponents folding a lot of better hands. I am not at all surprised that you find the style of play that worked for you at higher stakes not generating great results at mid-stakes. Another thing I am going to point out involves some guessing on my part. I assume that you play a lot more tables at NL100 than at the higher stakes you are used to (can't really see you grinding 8-12 tables of NL2000). LAG style requires a lot more careful analysis than ABC TAG, and when you add so many more tables, I would guess that the quality of reads and analysis that you are able to perform decreases greatly. It has been my experience that LAG grinders playing 8+ tables at NL100-NL400 are some of the most profitable people to play against after the obvious fish. Just my 2c. I know LP is a big fan of LAG play and I am basically blaspheming against all that is holy on this site, but it's just so damn easy to exploit LAG grinders....

word.

gogo midian!

On May 14 2009 05:12 Silver)Z( wrote: only your own video-making incompetence to blame really. why, oh why, didn't you do a few test runs of 1-2 mins long. /troll anyways, great to hear about how you're doing! delicious bloggage

I did, they always saved when they were 1-2 minutes long, but always blew up when they're 1 hour+ -_-

how do you exploit LAG grinders?

is it standard good to have your red line at the top and the blue line at the bottem? i have it the other way around -_-

On May 14 2009 05:17 ToT)MidiaN( wrote: Show nested quote + On May 14 2009 05:12 Silver)Z( wrote: only your own video-making incompetence to blame really. why, oh why, didn't you do a few test runs of 1-2 mins long. /troll anyways, great to hear about how you're doing! delicious bloggage I did, they always saved when they were 1-2 minutes long, but always blew up when they're 1 hour+ -_-

as in nothing happened? its often takes 10mins+ for audio to compress?

sry midian u won't profit from me. too much soulread for u.

Submitted by : Fox

PokerStars Game #28181471726: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2009/05/14 9:10:52 ET
Table Tezcatlipoca 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: Duharijk ($100 in chips)
Seat 2: Hero ($121.20 in chips)
Seat 3: ToTMidiaN ($786.60 in chips)
Seat 4: DaKiwi47 ($312.85 in chips)
Seat 5: huggy3 ($161.20 in chips)
Seat 6: Excellent76 ($100 in chips)
huggy3: posts small blind $0.50
Excellent76: posts big blind $1

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero
Duharijk: folds
Hero: raises $2 to $3
ToTMidiaN: raises $7.50 to $10.50
DaKiwi47: folds
huggy3: folds
Excellent76: calls $9.50
Hero: folds

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $24.50)

   
Excellent76: checks
ToTMidiaN: bets $11.30
Excellent76: raises $18.70 to $30
ToTMidiaN: raises $746.10 to $776.10 and is all-in
Excellent76: calls $59.50 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($686.60) returned to ToTMidiaN

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $203.50)

   

River (Pot : $203.50)

   

Showdown
Excellent76: shows (a pair of Tens)
ToTMidiaN: shows (two pair, Aces and Tens)
ToTMidiaN collected $200.50 from pot

Summary
Total pot $203.50 | Rake $3
Board  
Seat 1: Duharijk folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: Hero folded before Flop
Seat 3: ToTMidiaN showed and won ($200.50) with two pair, Aces and Tens
Seat 4: DaKiwi47 (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: huggy3 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: Excellent76 (big blind) showed and lost with a pair of Tens

you shuold get a student
that would help clear your mind
a brazilian student btw.

Don't think anybody wants to be my student anymore, I get mocked by LP 100nl regs and apparently I can't even beat these limits

How do you get people to call at nl100 when you have it?