W t f 2 months

looks like you are being bluffed off in non-showdown pots? the all in equity is not too far off.
bah, these graphs suck anyway, really can't tell much about your game from them cause the effects could come from many sources.

It means u've got sucked out for a total of 10,000. Which is good. But u cant go gorcery shopping with Sklansky Bucks! So its also bad in that sense.

I think it also means that you are either getting shit tons of draws that misses without getting to showdown. Or you are calling to the river/Turn without showdown with marginal hands. Or it can also mean that u spew money PF and on the flop raising and making plays.
Im not %100 sure about the 2nd paragraph though.

yea thats what i was thinking too. it seems wierd that im so far off in nonshowdown hands, but it feels like all my draws are missing :| and i wonder how it calculates getting it in with draws and missing, i mean it can't be considered a suckout even though its sort of standerd in some spots. also i feel like ive been coolered nonstop :| so i wonder how it portrays cooler situations, like set over sets and stuff. :

This basically means that if you'd run 'exactly average' you'd have made $12,000 more than you actually did [difference between red line and blue line.] This isn't a great run, but it's also not *that* bad.

What's way more concerning is how much money you're losing in pots that don't go to showdown. You've made $30,000 in pots that go to showdown...but you've LOST $40,000 in pots that don't go to showdown [difference between blue and green line.] That is a *huge* discrepancy. Generally it means you're letting yourself get pushed off better hands too often, but it could really mean a variety of things...like taking too many passive lines w/ draws instead of aggressively semi-bluffing, or double barrel bluffing then check-folding the river too often, etc, etc. Hard to be able to provide much insight without really knowing your game.

On July 29 2008 18:50 DooMeR wrote: yea thats what i was thinking too. it seems wierd that im so far off in nonshowdown hands, but it feels like all my draws are missing :| and i wonder how it calculates getting it in with draws and missing, i mean it can't be considered a suckout even though its sort of standerd in some spots. also i feel like ive been coolered nonstop :| so i wonder how it portrays cooler situations, like set over sets and stuff. :

Yeah, that's the one thing this graph does *not* portray well. If you're playing 5/10 and get in a full-stack pre-flop with JJ when you think your opponent's range is [air 10%, AJ+, TT+] and your opponent happens to have AA the program just counts that as -$800 Sklansky bucks.

yo fuck your life.

TILT LIFE DOOMER

ur gay obv

On July 29 2008 18:53 Pillars wrote: This basically means that if you'd run 'exactly average' you'd have made $12,000 more than you actually did [difference between red line and blue line.] This isn't a great run, but it's also not *that* bad.

doent SK$ mean that the amount u should have won if there was no luck involved in poker? So if its above the actual showdown doesn't it mean u have won less than u should have?

On July 29 2008 20:00 capaneo wrote: Show nested quote + On July 29 2008 18:53 Pillars wrote: This basically means that if you'd run 'exactly average' you'd have made $12,000 more than you actually did [difference between red line and blue line.] This isn't a great run, but it's also not *that* bad. doent SK$ mean that the amount u should have won if there was no luck involved in poker? So if its above the actual showdown doesn't it mean u have won less than u should have?

I think I just worded my sentence poorly. What you say here is correct.

didn't FGators have a graph similar to this?

jebus dont love you right now

sure doesn't look like a nice graph anyway u look at it ;(

poopy doopy