0
 |
Reload   United States. Mar 30 2008 14:06. Posts 776 | | |
for rakeback? i'm nl5 right now but i'm thinking when i upgrade to nl10 i should at least take advantage of free moniez
|
|
NeillyAA said: NO, KK, NO!! | |
|
|
1
 |
acdawg712   United States. Mar 30 2008 14:14. Posts 2639 | | |
you probably shouldn't since FTP has 10% rakeback which is ridiculous for NL10. Most people recommend moving at $600 to take advantage of the bonus and since NL25 has less rake. |
|
phil hellmuth is genuinely a stupid person and he does not understand poker very well at all - [vital]myth | |
|
|
1
 |
SKoT   United States. Mar 30 2008 14:15. Posts 1768 | | |
stars is softer, but for micro i guess it doesnt matter |
|
|
1
 |
collegesucks   United States. Mar 30 2008 14:20. Posts 5780 | | |
rofl another potential victim |
|
|
1
 |
Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Mar 30 2008 14:20. Posts 9634 | | |
mvoe at 25nl with 600$ for bonus % rb and also 10nl tables have 10% rake at FTP which is pretty much SICK its like losing 5% more of ur profit |
|
|
1
 |
kimseongchan   United States. Mar 30 2008 14:21. Posts 2089 | | |
| On March 30 2008 13:20 collegesucks wrote:
rofl another potential victim |
|
|
|
1
 |
rANDY   United Kingdom. Mar 30 2008 14:37. Posts 2223 | | |
at NL10 and lower at FTP u will be worse of than at stars even with rakeback because the rake is so large at FTP at micro stakes |
|
|
1
 |
SpasticInk   Sweden. Mar 30 2008 16:12. Posts 6298 | | |
| On March 30 2008 13:14 acdawg712 wrote:
you probably shouldn't since FTP has 10% rakeback which is ridiculous for NL10. Most people recommend moving at $600 to take advantage of the bonus and since NL25 has less rake. |
|
|
|
1
 |
SpasticInk   Sweden. Mar 30 2008 16:12. Posts 6298 | | |
do that. when u hit 600 move it and take the full bonus at FTP |
|
|
1
 |
goodguysm   United States. Mar 30 2008 16:58. Posts 1051 | | |
when i went from stars to ftp i went on a huge downswing. never recovered.
i went back to stars.
DONT MAKE THE SAME MISTAKE |
|
|
|