1
 |
BigRed0000  United States. Jul 19 2007 03:42. Posts 3554 | | |
Basically i'm up 2400 in two nights of live 1/2. The play is horrendous and I chopped a tournament with a guy for ~500 profit. Live poker is so bad, I cannot even wait for Vegas 2/5.
|
|
|
1
 |
Silver_nz New Zealand. Jul 19 2007 04:53. Posts 5647 | | |
but 1 table + heavy rake = sick variance |
|
|
1
| |
lol only fish chop tournaments (jk) |
|
| - chlopaki w mercedesie nie beda sie pierdolic - AND ALL U WACK POKER PLAYERS TRYING TO PUT A BAD BEAT ON ME JUST REMEMBER THAT I HATE YOU AND THAT I CANT STAND YOU | |
|
|
1
 |
GsOne Poland. Jul 19 2007 06:21. Posts 732 | | |
How does one-tabling change variance, not to mention bigger but constant rake? |
|
| THE RAKE - Hair Styling Tips by Daniel Negreanu | |
|
|
1
|
SakiSaki Sweden. Jul 19 2007 07:22. Posts 9685 | | |
lol theres no variance in live poker |
|
| what wackass site is this nigga? | |
|
|
1
|
Silver_nz New Zealand. Jul 19 2007 07:46. Posts 5647 | | |
o.o ok if you say so
..but the reason we play 1000s of hands multi tabling is to reduce variance. obviously the fewer hands you play the greater the variance. and if you don't have a big bank roll the variance kills you eventually. that why we don't go play NL1000 with only 2 buy-ins.
setups like AAv KK or set over would be a source of variance. but apparently they never happen live. |
|
|
1
|
SakiSaki Sweden. Jul 19 2007 08:40. Posts 9685 | | |
Sounds to me that you have no idea what variance is.
"the fewer hands you play the greater variance" is not obvious. Its stupid. We dont reduce variance by playing thousands of hands, we beat through the variance to earlier see the long term results. There is definitely ALOT less variance in live poker because your opponents are in general much much worse than online players. + you pick up alot more reads and tells live which makes it easier to get away from setups etc. It takes alot longer to see the long term results live because you play less hands/h but that doesnt mean theres more variance. |
|
| what wackass site is this nigga? | |
|
|
1
|
locoo Peru. Feb 02 2008 23:44. Posts 4561 | | |
nono, less hands = bigger variance is true >.<
theres SICK variance on live poker. Ive lost AK vs J7o all in PF and what not,
barely up at cash game there even tho I played pretty good for the most part.
lost like QQ vs 83s on 83x flop raising to like 30$ PF and much more >.<
I can't dream of being able to play 16 tables of live cash game for 4 hours everyday tho, would be great, cuz it would reduce variance. |
|
| bitte bitte bitte bitte bitte bitte | |
|
|
1
| |
| | On February 02 2008 22:44 locoo wrote:
nono, less hands = bigger variance is true >.<
theres SICK variance on live poker. Ive lost AK vs J7o all in PF and what not,
barely up at cash game there even tho I played pretty good for the most part.
lost like QQ vs 83s on 83x flop raising to like 30$ PF and much more >.<
I can't dream of being able to play 16 tables of live cash game for 4 hours everyday tho, would be great, cuz it would reduce variance. |
wait, but saki just said.... |
|
|
|
