edit: How does this apply to poker? The solution is surprisingly simple. We don't need statistics and should know the answer anyway. Later we will look at some properties of Markov Chains and Martingale difference sequences before concluding that actions made in the moment are made regardless of statistical updates.
In short, we want to reduce a panel data to time series--eliminate time series altogether--and then simply evaluate the properties of our argument. Now there is only cross-sectional data and the time series element is gone altogether. Eventually, we could dispense with statistics itself by simply considering what econometricians call the corner solution and elasticity.
Years ago I got help on this math problem from DrThundza. For those interested, it's time for me to tackle the problem using modern computer technology.
edit: so, I'm getting ready to solve the problem.
The first and most obvious solution is to use an annihilation matrix to eliminate one aspect of the data (which I already have). Then by using a simple intersection algorithm a polygon can be fit to the object.
The second, less obvious method, is simply to use polyfit and "eyeball" the solution by comparing areas.
Here is 1 solution: What else would you do?
I uploaded a covert description of everything ever. Based on the well known transformation, an orthodox transformation of reality onto the R1 plane (0,1) a complete description of everything ever is here.
Reinstate the original matrices as bootstrapped samples (including a sort of random information theory x-axis bootstrap for the independent variable)
We're including some random values as a backdrop for "this is everything there is." Amazingly, everything there is changes dramatically as we bootstrap more data into our work.
What seems to be fun here is we are using a sort of arbitrary covariance determinant to evaluate the y-axis for compression.
Sometimes I feel like intelligence is a huge geometric intersection of what everyone can understand. The more people included the smarter you are. In poker the narrative of skill breaks down from what older players find obvious to what is or isn't obvious to the competition at the time. I don't play much any more outside of a few traveling trips and online free sites. Today I think it would be really tough to re-experience the online poker world like it was in the early millennium.
The narrative of a poker game is quite exciting these days unlike when it was more mathematical or logical. Players are increasing their understanding of game psychology (when they're serious). There are a lot of unknowns in poker. I'd be happy if it was easier to play more, but it's not really an available feature at the moment.
Grubby defeated 'OneTime' in Orc (OneTime) vs. Night Elf (Grubby-theorized) while OneTime was participating in a Warcraft III: Frozen Throne event in China. The game was played on Lost Temple. This game took place in 2008 before the Beijing Olympics. The game was Orc @ 3 o'clock vs. Night Elf @ 6 o'clock. Abusing a fast expansion, the Night Elf player won the game with Bear Druids.
This game inspired the famous Death Note controversy:
Years ago, Nazgul asked me about LiquidPoker Pants, a person I met in China. Upon reflection, I decided that I probably met LiquidPoker pants as a consequence of one or two things. The first might be giving $5 to a wino, and the second might be buying McDonalds for a chinese boy. You're not supposed to do either of these things according to superstition and folklore.
Do you think it's possible to skip something in our stream of consciousness? Like when we attempt to deliberately block something out it shows up the very next thing in our next sentence. If I think, "I won't go to the mall today, but I don't want anyone to know, so I won't mention it." Then my next sentence will probably involve something mall-related at a considerable distance.
It seems almost impossible to do anything other than sublimate your avoided thought into the next impulse. I suppose some people are better at this than others. If I had the perfect range-finder I'd probably excel at conversation, but I rarely hit anything other than aces. I guess that means that I'm quasi-autistic, like I have the same function but not the disorder.
I was pretty good at poker. I got to around $40/hr at NL50 back when things were pretty juicy. Dunno how they are these days.
Contact Users: 2348 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 09:55
,
,
,
,