My most epic 2 days of 2011 - Page 2

Basically with the current dynamic, there was no way he would flat a draw/monster on the flop. So the only time he flats is, Acehighs and 8X 3X or some mid pair.

On the turn when he raises its because he knows the made hand that he flatted is likely to be put into a tough spot on most rivers if he calls coz of my 2nd barrel so he decides to turn it into a bluff.

Thus having 88 reduces the chance of hes made hands turned bluffs so i'd rather have KX

[x] wobbly claims he has superuser read on yurasov

lol jk nice hand

On November 13 2011 04:49 AndrewSong wrote: [x] wobbly claims he has superuser read on yurasov lol jk nice hand

The hand was obv me hitting a set in a 3bet pot and just close eyes call down

I am quite positive that no matter how you want to spin it, you are delusional to how many combos he can turn into bluffs here if you had Kx instead of 88 and it would be ALOT more -ev having Kx and calling down vs his range compared to 88. Stop pretending Kx is better calling down vs his play because it is not.

On November 13 2011 09:05 Highcard wrote: I am quite positive that no matter how you want to spin it, you are delusional to how many combos he can turn into bluffs here if you had Kx instead of 88 and it would be ALOT more -ev having Kx and calling down vs his range compared to 88. Stop pretending Kx is better calling down vs his play because it is not.

very bold statement lol. I think ur delusional and completely clueless as you were not even in the game or have ever played this high vs these types of players. I aint trying to spin anything.

On November 13 2011 09:05 Highcard wrote: I am quite positive that no matter how you want to spin it, you are delusional to how many combos he can turn into bluffs here if you had Kx instead of 88 and it would be ALOT more -ev having Kx and calling down vs his range compared to 88. Stop pretending Kx is better calling down vs his play because it is not.

iamsomadatubro.jpg jesus.

lol highcard have u even played a game with a higher buy-in than a big blind of this game? -_-

On November 12 2011 17:20 wobbly_au wrote: yea game was def running coz of yura~ me and locoo have good times, you remember few days ago winning 4-5 flips in HU? Also with how the game was running, I woulda called any K vs yura, i actually prefer any K over 88 and im sure if you guys thought hard enough you'd figure out why.

damn right i remember, good times

On November 13 2011 21:43 Baalim wrote: lol highcard have u even played a game with a higher buy-in than a big blind of this game? -_-

Yes and I have no care to take either of your words on thinking Kx with a weaker kicker is more desirable than 88, unless you are going to write out a detailed analysis. Because really, I doubt it is there. The amount of Flush combos compared to 8x bluffs and the added equity of having a fullhouse redraw to the times he has a flush, more than outweighs the times he turns weak SD + FD draw into bluffs and barrels off. I don't think this concept is even close from a total range game theory line.

On November 15 2011 12:53 Highcard wrote: Show nested quote + On November 13 2011 21:43 Baalim wrote: lol highcard have u even played a game with a higher buy-in than a big blind of this game? -_- Yes and I have no care to take either of your words on thinking Kx with a weaker kicker is more desirable than 88, unless you are going to write out a detailed analysis. Because really, I doubt it is there. The amount of Flush combos compared to 8x bluffs and the added equity of having a fullhouse redraw to the times he has a flush, more than outweighs the times he turns weak SD + FD draw into bluffs and barrels off. I don't think this concept is even close from a total range game theory line.

total range theory line what??

o did i mention u were wrong?