100 BI, restart again..

FIRST

LOL from an opposite to the other, so good, i love you neilly.

I can't wait to see that. and i think that the "but not vs anyone that has talent" line is gonna be your first excuse the next time people catch you playing underolled "I know i'm a better player than him so i'm playing him!" just like you said before, attacking when you see +EV!

ur starting to tilt me more than jamie gold u fucking moron.
i hope u go busto, no wait i hope u die in a fire.

On November 20 2007 08:07 wobbly_au wrote: ur starting to tilt me more than jamie gold u fucking moron. i hope u go busto, no wait i hope u die in a fire.

wtf that's so mean. he's entertaining and hasn't hurt anyone, he doesn't deserve death!

yeah man be nice
gl dude

nl5 exists in between nl2 and nl10 just so ya know

it makes me sad to read this blog

it used to be entertaining, but then I realized I was just laughing at someone else's degeneracy that is SO deep that he can't see the obvious slivers of truth in all the flames and still clings to an image of himself as a great player. I mean, seriously, is there anything more tragic? This is some shakespearean shit right here

just to clear things up, this is not entertaining

YES! I was wondering when the bug would get the best of him and make him deviate from his plan to raise his BR reqs! It's not like 50BI is a bad thing at all, but it is half of the 100BI rule he said before obv, and this is the first sign of going back to being a degen.

GL Neilly!!! XD

Moderation, man. Moderation. You're going to busto and/or kill yourself one of these days.

I'm not busting or killing myself, I've been learning alot about this game, and haven't been playing too long.

Thanks for the GL guys, I'll be playing on atleast 50 BI's until NL25 where I'll kick it up to 100 BI's.

GL everyone,
Ryan (DReaMe)

*and its hard for me to pass up on a noob sitting on a HU NL50 table, sometimes I just have to pounce*

and im far from degen, i just don't have much else to do other than play poker at home

the part that puts me on the most tilt about his blog is this part:

GL everyone,
Ryan (DReaMe)

i dont know why, its just so stupid to always put that

I don't know how many times ppl may have told you already but once more might help:

You don't have to apply such ridiculous huge buy-in bank roll management strategies, how about instead of applying extremes you just choose something that is somewhere in between?

Seriously 30 buy-ins for each stake and moving down when you drop down to 20 buy-ins before giving it another shot is just FINE.

The way you're going about it you're either going down bankroll suicide playing extremely under rolled or going to just kill yourself because using a 100 buy in or even a 50 buy in rule will be soooo tedious and boring to stick to especially playing microstakes.

Moderation means not setting absurdly high bankroll requirements for yourself, is what I was getting at. If you have a modest winrate then your risk of ruin will be 1% or less with 25 or 30 buyins. What advantage is there to going up to 50 or 100 buyins? It's negligible. All it serves to do is slow you down and frustrate you. The only way you can be hurt is to tilt and/or break your bankroll management, and I think trying to play excessively overrolled makes that more likely, not less. Playing with 25 BI and having the discipline to stick to that plan is far better than alternating between playing overrolled and underrolled and switching what games you play constantly.

I can't see any good coming from setting such arbitrary limits on yourself, they prove nothing to anyone. Playing very overrolled is not a virtue. Discipline doesn't mean playing overrolled, it means never playing underrolled. Playing overrolled most of the time won't make up for playing underrolled even a little of the time.

I think you'd be best served by setting some reasonable requirements for yourself, get comfortable at the appropriate limit, and just play poker.

take the advice i gave you on bnet already

50BIs? 100BIs? at 10/25nl?? degeneracy aside, you're never going to make it anywhere in poker playing with bankroll management that conservative.
When you're playing nl10 and you can make 50 buyins a week working fulltime at an average job.. and its probably gonna take you 2 months to do the same grinding. why waste your time?? I mean i can see not wanting to play 100nl headsup without say 35 buyins... but at the nl10 level you're not really risking much. n10 is a good introduction to the game, but once u have a little experience and confidence that u can beat the game, go to 25nl. even if you're 2 tabling with a 6 buyin bankroll, as least it has some upside.

On November 20 2007 09:22 Syntax wrote: the part that puts me on the most tilt about his blog is this part: GL everyone, Ryan (DReaMe) i dont know why, its just so stupid to always put that

lol. the part that tilts me is when he adds SuPeRNoVA! at the end sometimes.

huh i play 2/4 with over 100 buy ins, am i not going anywhere in poker?

PS i almost beat u in starcraft once.

On November 20 2007 09:41 Fayth wrote: huh i play 2/4 with over 100 buy ins, am i not going anywhere in poker?

100 buyins for u is 40 grand. thats a year's salary at a pretty good job. so ya at those stakes it makes sense to be conservative. When you can find a buyin in your couch cushions it doesnt.

i lol'ed at the couch cushions reference

dude dont play hu, i have played u hu before.. dont play it

On November 20 2007 09:51 CamilaPunt wrote: dude dont play hu, i have played u hu before.. dont play it

ya agreed, if u have tilt problems hu is the last place u wanna be.

HU is 100% tilt control, neilly is the King of tilt

i cant find words anymore

On November 20 2007 09:41 Fayth wrote: huh i play 2/4 with over 100 buy ins, am i not going anywhere in poker?

r u srs? move up already!

ROFLMAO ; This blog deserves 6 stars ;

On November 20 2007 08:07 Loco wrote: LOL from an opposite to the other, so good, i love you neilly. I can't wait to see that. and i think that the "but not vs anyone that has talent" line is gonna be your first excuse the next time people catch you playing underolled "I know i'm a better player than him so i'm playing him!" just like you said before, attacking when you see +EV!

hey, you got a shark!

On November 20 2007 08:07 wobbly_au wrote: ur starting to tilt me more than jamie gold u fucking moron. i hope u go busto, no wait i hope u die in a fire.

lol wtf

On November 20 2007 09:22 Syntax wrote: the part that puts me on the most tilt about his blog is this part: GL everyone, Ryan (DReaMe) i dont know why, its just so stupid to always put that

lol agreed

absurd


see you in 3 days when you start posting 200nl hands againq

How long til u start playing $109 mtts

How much did you lose this time, Nelly?

gl man, i also think 50buyins for 2nl is a little much but what ever you need to do to make money, do it. gl with everything

use 20 buyins til NL100

TOOo MUCH PLANNING, NOT REALLY GOING ANYWHERE

THATS NEILLY

best of luck!!

On November 20 2007 09:27 PoorUser wrote: take the advice i gave you on bnet already

Uuuuuh no, he's not the type that listens to advice from more experienced poker players...

Anyway, I recommend a 1000 buy-ins rule for NL2, which will allow you to take some agressive shots at NL600 HU if you see a fish sitting there.

see you at McDonald's next week

whoa... thats a rough riders blog.

On November 20 2007 13:40 MilZo wrote: Show nested quote + On November 20 2007 09:27 PoorUser wrote: take the advice i gave you on bnet already Uuuuuh no, he's not the type that listens to advice from more experienced poker players... Anyway, I recommend a 1000 buy-ins rule for NL2, which will allow you to take some agressive shots at NL600 HU if you see a fish sitting there.

LOLOL