High Stakes Poker - Page 57

On February 24 2009 20:05 traxamillion wrote: I would make the call antonius made also; the fact laak won't vbet thin makes it more of a call imo

Yeah, of course. Every 50nl+ player here would. Easy calldown for 3 streets when flop is multiway and he goes three barrels for 10000 times your roll.

On February 24 2009 20:58 VanDerMeyde wrote: Show nested quote + On February 24 2009 20:42 tomson wrote: I really don't see how it's anything but a river call. When you guys are in Eastgates spot do you go like 'Well, Dwan is 3barreling in a multiway pot. He could have 55, 33 , 65, 63, 74, 42, BUT I'M HOPING HE HAS TRIP 6s, I RAISE.' ? Hmm I think his range can be wider than this, but yeah I agree

I was just showing how many hands have us beat and how close to none worse call a raise.

gimme 100 racks i'd dominate

On February 24 2009 20:05 traxamillion wrote: I would make the call antonius made also; the fact laak won't vbet thin makes it more of a call imo

lol

laak bet made sense only if he was a monster, he wouldn't have done this big bet with a AK type of hand. So Antonius' question was "does he have that KKK or QQQ or stg like that or is he 3barrel-bluffing me".

On February 24 2009 23:17 Liofle wrote: laak bet made sense only if he was a monster, he wouldn't have done this big bet with a AK type of hand. So Antonius' question was "does he have that KKK or QQQ or stg like that or is he 3barrel-bluffing me".

solid insight

On February 24 2009 23:21 Sliggy wrote: Show nested quote + On February 24 2009 23:17 Liofle wrote: laak bet made sense only if he was a monster, he wouldn't have done this big bet with a AK type of hand. So Antonius' question was "does he have that KKK or QQQ or stg like that or is he 3barrel-bluffing me". solid insight

ROFL

or he thought oh man if i make this call its gona look so cool

Yea Laaks nittyness definitely made it a bluff or a huge hand. Most of the time a huge hand in his case..sick call.

I wouldn't attach too much value to Durrr saying he calls a raise that's just table talk. Raising there seems pretty bad even if it is vs Durrr. It's a nine handed game where someone fires flop, turn river in a four-way pot. Value raising the river seems a recipe for failure.

hmm after 2 years of failure maybe a decent player won the wsop for a change.

how little have you guys railed durrrr online?! theres for sure value in raising in eastgates spot and i think durrrrs reaction is 100% honest when he says he would snap a raise.

On February 25 2009 07:03 Sliggy wrote: hmm after 2 years of failure maybe a decent player won the wsop for a change.

Yeah Peter Eastgate is definitivly better than Jamie Gold and the religious guy. Peter Eastgate was a regular at 100-200 NL games on Betfair before WSOP (I heard)

He might call a raise with 6x but thats a pretty small portion of his range where alot of boats are included. And getting reshipped by durr there would certainly suck

im not sure if its before or after HSP5 was filmed but eastgate is Isser on PS right? and durrrr and isser had some pretty siiiick HU-matches there so if that was before they certainly have alot of history as well. If eastgate was some random nit live-player then ok, but now hes not.

and i think every combo of a 6 is in durrrs range, as long as its sooted.

So I been watching series 4 of HSP, and jesus Sami Farha is the biggest fish i have ever seen. rofl But at same time he is pretty baller rofl

Jokes

On February 25 2009 08:38 VanDerMeyde wrote: Show nested quote + On February 25 2009 07:03 Sliggy wrote: hmm after 2 years of failure maybe a decent player won the wsop for a change. Yeah Peter Eastgate is definitivly better than Jamie Gold and the religious guy. Peter Eastgate was a regular at 100-200 NL games on Betfair before WSOP (I heard)

I read 200/400 on prima, anyway...

On February 25 2009 16:59 Chewits wrote: So I been watching series 4 of HSP, and jesus Sami Farha is the biggest fish i have ever seen. rofl But at same time he is pretty baller rofl Jokes

I thought he played ok once they went super high stakes.

On February 25 2009 04:29 Nazgul wrote: Yea Laaks nittyness definitely made it a bluff or a huge hand. Most of the time a huge hand in his case..sick call. I wouldn't attach too much value to Durrr saying he calls a raise that's just table talk. Raising there seems pretty bad even if it is vs Durrr. It's a nine handed game where someone fires flop, turn river in a four-way pot. Value raising the river seems a recipe for failure.

on the turn much would be much better than on the river, especially on that board, its quite dangerous

farha is a supermegahero

he was easily my favorite person on the last season

On February 25 2009 08:32 Balzamon wrote: how little have you guys railed durrrr online?! theres for sure value in raising in eastgates spot and i think durrrrs reaction is 100% honest when he says he would snap a raise.

yeah if peter could see durrr's cards i bet he would have raised.