Next generation blockchain powered poker network launching April 20th 2018 - Page 2

On March 25 2018 23:30 Syllogism wrote: Guys have a look at this https://cryptopokerclub.io/news/block...logy-poker-game-integrity-update.html

This is so fucking cringeworthy... And I try not to swear too much on the interwebs lol

I don't know if they realize that no matter how many layers they add, the difference is most likely going to be non-existent, let alone "33% less setups" or as they call them "Bad beats" :D

At first I thought, damn that idea is actually pretty cool, then rationality striked in .... and NO.

I mean fuck PokerStars for so many different reasons and fuck 99% of the current websites, but this doesn't really strike me as anything even worth looking at.


edit:
So in one post it says 30% and in another 1/3rd ... I dont know if they realize how big of a deal 3% mean in anything related to game of chances, even if its the related to the "RNG" in this case

This project raises so many red flags.

Hello internet family,

I'm back for more explaining as I see a lot of concerns here. I will go one by one:

From where did you get that 30%? and even if that number were true (its not) saying that 1 of every 3 bad beats might be due to faulty RNG is stupid and disingenuous, thats not how statistic work geniuses.

We tested over 1000 hands several times in a row and found UP TO 1/3 reduction in badbeats. Sometimes tests came up 10%, other times below 5 and a few times up to 30% but in all our tests, it was indeed more random than traditional games such as Pokerstars (our baseline test subject). Also we said 'LIKELY' not 'CERTAIN'. This is still an unexplored area and we are still working on it with a video case study coming soon after we launch.

You cannot stop bots with that, bots can simply capture the screen and press buttons, its not just you, thats why they are a big issue, if you could just stop them with that ease it wouldn't be the biggest threat to online poker.

I wont reveal the exact mechanism for our technology for obvious reasons but part of our validation checks is to check 'hot spots' and mouse movements of the clients computer. It doesn't matter if you cannot stop a bot simply pressing buttons, you cant simulate the bot to move the mouse (path) in a specific way or clicks with the actual pointers.

So which is it... free or 1% lol

We recently changed this to free. Refer to our website for the latest updated information or speak to our team for further clarifications.

so if my opponents always get bad beats it would be bad for me to join your site right

This doesn't make any sense. Which opponents and which platforms are you talking about? If you are referring to our refined RNG technology, all we are saying is we are trying to improve it as much as possible and have seen signs that it really did show more random results but it vary's. Either way the better question for you is why are you focusing on one point when there is so much more to assess? Why go straight to hate instead of actually learning something new, doing some research into others that are also trying to do the same and having a more open mind?

If they want to get rid of bots they probably have to put east europe into a separate network.

Refer to our answer above. There are ways to stop or at least become more secure. What we did is completely unknown to anyone and have added further layers of security. Pokerstars for example can do more about it but it would cost them a lot to do so and since they are so large, network infrastructure updates will take a long time and again be expensive. Don't be a defeatist. There are always ways, So in your rationale, it is absolutely impossible to stop bottling on poker forever? Are you seriously suggesting that? I'm not saying it is theoretically impossible for a group to develop a specialized bot if they had enough information about us. What I'm saying is they do not have that information and we have taken a great deal of effort to prevent bots. Our game will be more secure than traditional poker rooms and that is a fact. Again something we tested and proven but unlike the card shuffling which we will make a case study on - this we cannot publically show. If you truly doubt it so much, join the game and after we launch just spectate and see for yourself. Or better yet - if you are a engineer or know a group, feel free to ask them to test our system and see if they can get their bots to work.

I don't know if they realize that no matter how many layers they add, the difference is most likely going to be non-existent, let alone "33% less setups" or as they call them "Bad beats" :D At first I thought, damn that idea is actually pretty cool, then rationality striked in .... and NO. I mean fuck PokerStars for so many different reasons and fuck 99% of the current websites, but this doesn't really strike me as anything even worth looking at. edit: So in one post it says 30% and in another 1/3rd ... I dont know if they realize how big of a deal 3% mean in anything related to game of chances, even if its the related to the "RNG" in this case This project raises so many red flags.

Again regarding the RNG, refer to my previous reply. Also i'm quite interested to know - out of the 100+ different variables here that you could have assessed, you pick out only one and say "they are bad, this is a scam, not worth it". Is that a genuine or fair assessment? How about the fact that we are offering more rakeback than any other traditional poker room out there? Rake as well is lower? Or huge bonuses paid out in full instead of parts? Or the new refined graphics? Or the fact that our withdrawals are instant and cost fee instead of waiting days/weeks at times on other rooms?



User was banned for this post.

We tested over 1000 hands

stopped reading there

you're literally a 2/3 live fish

why is this scam not deleted? i dont get it

On March 29 2018 10:53 cryptopoker_cl wrote: We tested over 1000 hands

Please leave. Can a mod just ban the acc and delete the thread? This is a joke a 12yo kid can probably write an algorithm testing hundreds of millions of hands in a few minutes. In your case you'd just have to do it using your RNG lmao

On March 29 2018 10:53 cryptopoker_cl wrote: Hello internet family,

how quaint

On March 29 2018 10:53 cryptopoker_cl wrote: Show nested quote + so if my opponents always get bad beats it would be bad for me to join your site right This doesn't make any sense. Which opponents and which platforms are you talking about? If you are referring to our refined RNG technology, all we are saying is we are trying to improve it as much as possible and have seen signs that it really did show more random results but it vary's. Either way the better question for you is why are you focusing on one point when there is so much more to assess? Why go straight to hate instead of actually learning something new, doing some research into others that are also trying to do the same and having a more open mind?

what do you mean it doesn't make sense? you claimed (or rather the infographic you sourced to freelancer.com claimed) that established platforms are rigged. those platforms. i'm talking about the ones you're talking about, that you claim increase rakeback instead of investing in RNG, you brought this up

you say other platforms are rigged and people are having bad beats. if you have a bad beat then villain sucked out. one person running bad is someone else running good. so what if those platforms are rigged in your favor? why would someone switch to your most reputable and fair site instead then?

how much money do you get per open minded person?

also how did you get established platforms to share their stats with you for comparison? and shouldn't you use your insights to bring a lawsuit against the people who certify the randomness of those platforms or do you think trying to scam forums you found from google would be more profitable

punt