Doug "WCGRider" Polk going against No Limit Bot for $100,000 - Page 2

On April 27 2015 17:58 RaiZ wrote: It's kinda sad they already know they're playing a bot. I'm more curious if they could "spot" a bot if they were to play on a poker software. Not controlled by a third party but actually made by the software itself.

I think that a bot sophisticated enough to hang w/ the highest stakes HU players would also be sophisticated enough to avoid detection (at least by it's opponents and possibly also by the client security).

Just off the top of my head

Timing randomization
Line randomization
Occasionally make human errors (timeout, misclick, etc)

can't imagine what someone who dedicates their lives to programming bots could think of to avoid detection

On April 27 2015 18:46 Smuft wrote: Show nested quote + On April 27 2015 17:58 RaiZ wrote: It's kinda sad they already know they're playing a bot. I'm more curious if they could "spot" a bot if they were to play on a poker software. Not controlled by a third party but actually made by the software itself. I think that a bot sophisticated enough to hang w/ the highest stakes HU players would also be sophisticated enough to avoid detection (at least by it's opponents and possibly also by the client security). Just off the top of my head Timing randomization Line randomization Occasionally make human errors (timeout, misclick, etc) can't imagine what someone who dedicates their lives to programming bots could think of to avoid detection

That's what concerns me. A bot made by the software itself doesn't need detection ? They're simply made in order to make us think their software is full of legit players. Thus making more rake til the last one. I really don't see any cons about it.

It's making online poker players more paranoid than they already are...

On April 27 2015 02:11 Blitzkrieg0 wrote: Show nested quote + On April 27 2015 01:52 Highcard wrote: are there streams of previous days? http://www.twitch.tv/claudico_vs_dougpolk/profile/past_broadcasts or go to past broadcasts of another player if you wanted someone else.

thanks

tons of people back in day saying nobody could ever make a tough bot that can win. here we are now, some bot that can probably beat 400NL
in today's games. heh

On April 28 2015 05:03 whamm! wrote: tons of people back in day saying nobody could ever make a tough bot that can win. here we are now, some bot that can probably beat 400NL in today's games. heh

The key is headsup, the amount of variables in a ring game are so much more for a bot to handle, for us is no problem but how computer works its really difficult

On April 28 2015 07:23 Baalim wrote: Show nested quote + On April 28 2015 05:03 whamm! wrote: tons of people back in day saying nobody could ever make a tough bot that can win. here we are now, some bot that can probably beat 400NL in today's games. heh The key is headsup, the amount of variables in a ring game are so much more for a bot to handle, for us is no problem but how computer works its really difficult

+1

lol poker turing test?

I don't understand the results? who is up?

On April 28 2015 21:19 casinocasino wrote: I don't understand the results? who is up?

A number in parenthesis means lost money.

Okay thanks? I want to know actual results, cant find information.

On April 28 2015 22:12 casinocasino wrote: Okay thanks? I want to know actual results, cant find information.

http://www.liquidpoker.net/stream/claudico_extra
I just assumed you knew where to look sorry.