Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 95836
Submitted by : FoolsPlay
PokerStars Game #6926048305: Hold'em No Limit ($0.10/$0.25) - 2006/11/07 - 01:49:39 (ET)
Table 'Artemis' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: ckram ($8.45 in chips)
Seat 2: IndieStarGrl ($32.25 in chips)
Seat 3: kala5583 ($27.05 in chips)
Seat 4: los huevos23 ($9.80 in chips)
Seat 5: FoolsPlay ($32.25 in chips)
Seat 6: wootie1 ($4.65 in chips)
FoolsPlay: posts small blind $0.10
wootie1: posts big blind $0.25
Holecards
Dealt to FoolsPlay  
ckram: folds
IndieStarGrl: folds
kala5583: folds
los huevos23: raises $0.75 to $1
FoolsPlay: raises $2.50 to $3.50
wootie1: folds
los huevos23: raises $6.30 to $9.80 and is all-in
FoolsPlay: calls $6.30
Flop (Pot : $19.85)
  
Turn (Pot : $19.85)
River (Pot : $19.85)
Showdown
FoolsPlay: shows (a pair of Kings)
los huevos23: shows   (a flush, Ace high)
los huevos23 collected $18.90 from pot
Summary
Total pot $19.85 | Rake $0.95
Board
Seat 1: ckram folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: IndieStarGrl folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: kala5583 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: los huevos23 (button) showed and won ($18.90) with a flush, Ace high
Seat 5: FoolsPlay (small blind) showed and lost with a pair of Kings
Seat 6: wootie1 (big blind) folded before Flop
 |
Comments |
 |
1
 |
FoolsPlay Canada. Nov 06 2006 23:51. Posts 1335 | | |
los huevos23: well i win then
|
|
| if you add tons of macro options and units and keep the old obligations like sending scvs to mine, pros will just focus less on micro which sucks imo -Floofy | |
|
| |
| 
