PokerStars Game #65095809082: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00 USD) - 2011/07/26 10:39:25 ET
Table Juno V 6-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: theriverkid3 ($102.50 in chips)
Seat 2: zzz--59 ($88.50 in chips)
Seat 3: ImpulsesKid ($102 in chips)
Seat 4: Hero ($104.15 in chips)
Seat 5: kennethdein ($103.50 in chips)
Seat 6: klkkenny ($100 in chips)
theriverkid3: posts small blind $0.50
zzz--59: posts big blind $1
ImpulsesKid: checks
Hero: bets $15
ImpulsesKid: raises $77.50 to $92.50 and is all-in
Hero: calls $77.50
River (Pot : $208.00)
Showdown ImpulsesKid: shows (three of a kind, Fours)
Hero: mucks hand
ImpulsesKid collected $205 from pot
Summary Total pot $208 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: theriverkid3 (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: zzz--59 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: ImpulsesKid showed and won ($205) with three of a kind, Fours
Seat 4: Hero mucked
Seat 5: kennethdein folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: klkkenny (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
what read is that? villains line looks pretty standard to me and not particularly exploitable. i guess you'd be more inclined to check turn behind with stuff like A6ss than you would be vs someone who's always check-folding turn. but it doesn't necessarily mean you shouldn't bet when he checks, it's just that a lot of tagnits probably don't have a check-call range on this turn (from what i remember villain is a good tagnit).
but like for ex in this hand i think villain is less likely to be c-betting this board 3-way without flopping some kind of decent equity since it connects with quite a few hands, so i'd be more inclined to check back A6ss on turn than if the board was 2h5sTsXo, where villain's c-bet range would contain more air that's just check-folding turn.
(three of a kind, Fours)
