wtf I moved up and they don't respect my raises at all

seriously what the fuck is this guy calling for? ! he tanked his whole time bank lol. Man I hate when my bluffs fail :D!

dont bluff the unbluffable :-)

On October 13 2009 19:02 Night2o1 wrote: wtf I moved up and they don't respect my raises at all seriously what the fuck is this guy calling for? ! he tanked his whole time bank lol. Man I hate when my bluffs fail :D!

haha standard call by him...no one ever folds overpairs in a single raised pot, they just call down. Also congrats on moving up (assuming the move up was from u raping 1/2)

gororok speaks the truth

hehe I am not rolled to feel comfortable playing 2/4 except when I find a rly bad fish at 1/2 and see that he is also playing a 2/4 table :D

still working on 1/2 rape ><!

gaucho use to play a lot higher and is pretty good if i remember correctly

i would just give up turn most of the time

On October 13 2009 19:11 TimDawg wrote: gaucho use to play a lot higher and is pretty good if i remember correctly i would just give up turn most of the time

yah I didn't know much about him except for the couple of hands I've been sitting @ this table tbh, I just get a lil excited and want to bluff sometimes in spots I think are interesting, I guess this is a bad bluff? Not sure how what to think about it atm.. I definitely like to see all these comments and thoughts posted ^^

btw normally I do give up on turn as standard, just got that fire and wanted to mix it up this time lol

i like the bluff a lot more if you size it lower
something like 132 looks like you're trying to get value from his mid pairs while 176 looks like you're trying to blow him off of the hand

On October 13 2009 19:23 KeanuReaver wrote: i like the bluff a lot more if you size it lower something like 132 looks like you're trying to get value from his mid pairs while 176 looks like you're trying to blow him off of the hand

yah I definitely thought about this but I sort of have the idea that if its 132 its a lot easier to call (Even for a reg). But seeing as how this guy is an advanced hand reader (I didn't know) I would of bet 130-145. I'm not sure if that is good thinking tho, anyone else?

imo you need to know if villain will c/r w/ pair+OESD hands. if he c/c with those instead of c/r then i really like a triple barrel on this board. If he c/r with them then i don't like a triple very much since his range will become more weight to things he doesn't want to fold.

But in general I like a triple on this board since you can rep such a wide monster range, flushes, overpairs, and sets, assuming you will triple all those for value. Meanwhile his range when he c/c down two streets is typically weak hands like 99/89 most likely since he will almost certainly raise 88/77/55/56/76 and will likely c/r FDs to

also I don't like the cbet sizing much, would prefer like 20 dollars.

On October 13 2009 19:23 KeanuReaver wrote: i like the bluff a lot more if you size it lower something like 132 looks like you're trying to get value from his mid pairs while 176 looks like you're trying to blow him off of the hand

i disagree, his bet sizing on every street is large, when he bets river this large it looks like he is staying consistent and going for big value.

I do however like 20 on the flop, 48 on the turn, 115 on the river more as a general line IP...those numbers may be wrong, just doing them off the top of my head...basically i prefer like 2/3 pot all the way down instead of 80-90% pot all the way down.

thanks that's important to think about mang ^^
cb usually ~$20 here but I think table ninja snuck in there and messed up my betsize :D

I like your angle on the betsizing. Its rather hard to decide what is really optimal though.. I guess now that I have history with him I would then be able to find the best line.

smaller bets sux tho cuz then you win less when they fold river

On October 13 2009 19:36 Night2o1 wrote: thanks that's important to think about mang ^^ cb usually ~$20 here but I think table ninja snuck in there and messed up my betsize :D I like your angle on the betsizing. Its rather hard to decide what is really optimal though.. I guess now that I have history with him I would then be able to find the best line. smaller bets sux tho cuz then you win less when they fold river

true but u lose like 85 dollars less when they rape u in the ass and call u down w/ 99