PokerStars Game #29079053792: Holdem No Limit ($1/$2) - 2009/06/06 21:48:05 CT [2009/06/06 22:48:05 ET]
Table Ilsebill 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 2: sniderstyle ($412 in chips)
Seat 4: Dixon01 ($227 in chips)
Seat 5: Voltess ($207 in chips)
Seat 6: discobush ($195 in chips)
discobush: posts small blind $1
sniderstyle: posts big blind $2
gskgsad: sits out
Holecards
Dealt to sniderstyle 
Dixon01: raises $4 to $6
Voltess: folds
discobush: raises $12 to $18
sniderstyle: raises $30 to $48
Dixon01: folds
discobush: calls $30
Flop (Pot : $102.00)
discobush: bets $90
sniderstyle said, "EEEESH"
sniderstyle said, "tolugh spot for me"
1
 |
sniderstyle United States. Jun 06 2009 22:55. Posts 2046 | | |
wtf do i do here vs. unknwon fish? |
|
| Genginho: lose today 100 dollar only because of fishs they called and had luck on river | |
|
|
1
 |
k2o4 United States. Jun 06 2009 23:01. Posts 4803 | | |
| | On June 06 2009 21:55 sniderstyle wrote:
wtf do i do here vs. unknwon fish? |
I think I get it in if it's a fish but overall I dunno, shitty spot. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
MiPwnYa  Brasil. Jun 06 2009 23:03. Posts 5230 | | |
rofl get it in pls hes a fish and its only 100bb, folding is awful imo |
|
|
1
|
sniderstyle United States. Jun 06 2009 23:04. Posts 2046 | | |
youre awful! i folded and he claimed he had AQ with the Q of diamonds. |
|
| Genginho: lose today 100 dollar only because of fishs they called and had luck on river | Last edit: 06/06/2009 23:06 |
|
|
1
|
MiPwnYa Brasil. Jun 06 2009 23:09. Posts 5230 | | |
ROFL, srsly i rly hate foldin (im assuming your last post is a level) |
|
|
1
|
sniderstyle United States. Jun 06 2009 23:10. Posts 2046 | | |
yeah minus the i folded and cllaimed he had AQ with the Q of diamonds part |
|
| Genginho: lose today 100 dollar only because of fishs they called and had luck on river | |
|
|
1
|
sniderstyle United States. Jun 06 2009 23:10. Posts 2046 | | |
i mainly folded because i just stacked another ugy at a different table and thought id rather just not lose what i just made over there . |
|
| Genginho: lose today 100 dollar only because of fishs they called and had luck on river | |
|
|
1
|
MiPwnYa Brasil. Jun 06 2009 23:13. Posts 5230 | | | |
|
| | Last edit: 06/06/2009 23:38 |
|
|
1
 |
player999 Brasil. Jun 06 2009 23:13. Posts 7978 | | |
| | On June 06 2009 22:10 sniderstyle wrote:
i mainly folded because i just stacked another ugy at a different table and thought id rather just not lose what i just made over there . |
solid reasoning |
|
| Browsing through your hand histories makes me wonder that you might not be aware these games are possibly play money. Have you ever tried to cash out? - Kapol | |
|
|
1
 |
ShadowDrgn United States. Jun 06 2009 23:17. Posts 1156 | | |
You have to call 37.4% of the resulting pot. If he has Ax without the a diamond, you have 11 outs. 10 outs if he has a diamond, 9 outs if he has a made flush. He could also be bluffing. I'd just shove because you can't be doing any worse than neutral EV against any of his hands, and you're +EV against most of them.
What do you guys think about villain's play if he did have AQd? I'd go for a check/shove there every time because it's not like there are any scary turn cards if sniderstyle checks behind. |
|
|
1
|
MiPwnYa Brasil. Jun 06 2009 23:34. Posts 5230 | | |
| | On June 06 2009 22:17 ShadowDrgn wrote:
You have to call 37.4% of the resulting pot. If he has Ax without the a diamond, you have 11 outs. 10 outs if he has a diamond, 9 outs if he has a made flush. He could also be bluffing. I'd just shove because you can't be doing any worse than neutral EV against any of his hands, and you're +EV against most of them.
What do you guys think about villain's play if he did have AQd? I'd go for a check/shove there every time because it's not like there are any scary turn cards if sniderstyle checks behind. |
lol villains play is awful no matter what he has |
|
|
|
