PokerStars Game #5690287984: Hold'em No Limit ($2/$4) - 2006/07/26 - 16:40:59 (ET)
Table 'Agapenor' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: miamiheat21 ($353.80 in chips)
Seat 2: straate ($665.35 in chips)
Seat 3: slimboyfat ($411.80 in chips)
Seat 4: idonno123 ($926.15 in chips)
Seat 5: Heggis ($406.50 in chips)
Seat 6: takechip ($997.60 in chips)
Heggis: posts small blind $2
takechip: posts big blind $4
Holecards
Dealt to straate 
miamiheat21: folds
straate: raises $12 to $16
slimboyfat: folds
idonno123: calls $16
Heggis: folds
takechip: folds
Flop (Pot : $38)
straate: bets $33
idonno123: calls $33
Turn (Pot : $104)
straate: bets $66
idonno123: calls $66
River (Pot : $236)
straate: checks
idonno123: bets $125
straate: calls $125
Showdown
idonno123: shows 
(two pair, Aces and Sixes)
straate: shows (a full house, Aces full of Sixes)
straate collected $483 from pot
Summary
Total pot $486 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: miamiheat21 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 2: straate showed and won ($483) with a full house, Aces full of Sixes
Seat 3: slimboyfat folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: idonno123 (button) showed and lost with two pair, Aces and Sixes
Seat 5: Heggis (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 6: takechip (big blind) folded before Flop
1
 |
Rxd Rxxf United States. Jul 26 2006 14:42. Posts 647 | | | |
|
|
1
 |
KingKory United States. Jul 26 2006 14:47. Posts 2083 | | |
I'm confused...did you call because you wanted him to have to show his junk? |
|
| | Last edit: 26/07/2006 14:47 |
|
|
1
| |
im confused as to why the villain was calling with junk anyways. |
|
| Poker: a tax on people who are bad at math. | |
|
|
1
 |
TimDawg  United States. Jul 26 2006 14:52. Posts 10197 | | |
im confused with the call on the river too |
|
| online bob is actually a pretty smart person, not at all like the creepy fucker that sits in the sofa telling me he does nasty shit to me when im asleep - pinball | |
|
|
1
| |
im confused as to why we all have around 100 posts, but im still a rat  |
|
| Poker: a tax on people who are bad at math. | |
|
|
1
|
nomanirvana United States. Jul 26 2006 14:55. Posts 2523 | | |
He checked to induce a bluff and theres no way a bluff is calling a checkraise, why pay more rake for a split? Maybe only a 6 pays more but thats doubtful. |
|
| | Last edit: 26/07/2006 14:57 |
|
|
1
 |
SakiSaki Sweden. Jul 26 2006 14:56. Posts 9685 | | |
Why should he raise the river? What calls a raise there that he beats?
This was played perfectly |
|
| what wackass site is this nigga? | |
|
|
1
|
straate Argentina. Jul 26 2006 14:56. Posts 2837 | | |
the call...?? why? I HAD THE FH lol not him.... there isn't a point in me betting vs him, checking is more +ev here |
|
| silverfox971: if this was a live game i would spit on you | |
|
|
4
 |
Baalim Mexico. Jul 26 2006 14:57. Posts 34252 | | |
| | On July 26 2006 13:55 nomanirvana wrote:
He checked to induce a bluff and theres no way a bluff is calling a checkraise, why pay more rake for a split? Maybe only a 6 pays more but thats doubtful. |
are u serious? max rake = $3 lol...
and its not because a bluff wouldnt pay out a raise lol you dont give a flying fuck if he wont, you raise there however straate probably was afraid of quads there. |
|
| Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
1
|
nomanirvana United States. Jul 26 2006 14:58. Posts 2523 | | |
they mean why didnt you checkraise river I think |
|
|
1
|
straate Argentina. Jul 26 2006 14:58. Posts 2837 | | | |
|
| silverfox971: if this was a live game i would spit on you | |
|
|
1
|
nomanirvana United States. Jul 26 2006 14:59. Posts 2523 | | |
| | On July 26 2006 13:57 Baal wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2006 13:55 nomanirvana wrote:
He checked to induce a bluff and theres no way a bluff is calling a checkraise, why pay more rake for a split? Maybe only a 6 pays more but thats doubtful. |
are u serious? max rake = $3 lol...
and its not because a bluff wouldnt pay out a raise lol you dont give a flying fuck if he wont, you raise there however straate probably was afraid of quads there.
|
3 bucks is a ton of money man cmon |
|
|
4
 |
PoorUser United States. Jul 26 2006 15:00. Posts 7471 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
|
KingKory United States. Jul 26 2006 15:00. Posts 2083 | | |
| | On July 26 2006 13:59 nomanirvana wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 26 2006 13:57 Baal wrote:
| | On July 26 2006 13:55 nomanirvana wrote:
He checked to induce a bluff and theres no way a bluff is calling a checkraise, why pay more rake for a split? Maybe only a 6 pays more but thats doubtful. |
are u serious? max rake = $3 lol...
and its not because a bluff wouldnt pay out a raise lol you dont give a flying fuck if he wont, you raise there however straate probably was afraid of quads there.
|
3 bucks is a ton of money man cmon |
Getcha a side salad at Red Lobster.
...or at least that's what I've heard...
P.S. I am no longer confused by the call. |
|
| | Last edit: 26/07/2006 15:01 |
|
|
1
|
nomanirvana United States. Jul 26 2006 15:02. Posts 2523 | | |
basically its just a split at best so I was saying no point to raising YAY |
|
|
1
|
straate Argentina. Jul 26 2006 15:04. Posts 2837 | | |
yes ^^, hes not calling with less than what i have, and hes not folding either |
|
| silverfox971: if this was a live game i would spit on you | |
|
|
1
| |
obv not a split at best, since he won 
|
|
| Poker: a tax on people who are bad at math. | |
|
|
1
|
1
 |
Donald United States. Jul 26 2006 15:20. Posts 1289 | | |
omg... this is a standard play... nice but simple to understand |
|
| if you always go in with the worst hand youll never have a bad beat story | |
|
|
|
