PokerStars Game #5160757464: Hold'em No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2006/06/05 - 13:46:23 (ET)
Table 'Hamburga IV' 9-max Seat #9 is the button
Seat 1: LTender ($159.45 in chips)
Seat 2: XAVIER71 ($46.45 in chips)
Seat 3: nirvanna ($50.45 in chips)
Seat 4: Jaden4200 ($117.50 in chips)
Seat 5: appleho24 ($84.15 in chips)
Seat 6: Four_PG ($58 in chips)
Seat 7: Eerik ($99.50 in chips)
Seat 8: sven1972 ($41.50 in chips)
Seat 9: MARC 753 ($99.50 in chips)
LTender: posts small blind $0.50
XAVIER71: posts big blind $1
Four_PG: posts small & big blinds $1.50
Holecards
Dealt to Eerik 
nirvanna: calls $1
Jaden4200: folds
appleho24: calls $1
Four_PG: checks
Eerik: calls $1
sven1972: folds
MARC 753: folds
LTender: calls $0.50
XAVIER71: checks
Flop (Pot : $5)
LTender: checks
XAVIER71: checks
nirvanna: checks
appleho24: bets $3
Four_PG: folds
Eerik: raises $7 to $10
LTender: folds
XAVIER71: folds
nirvanna: folds
appleho24: calls $7
Turn (Pot : $25)
appleho24: checks
Eerik: bets $22
appleho24: calls $22
River (Pot : $69)
appleho24: bets $25
Eerik: folds
appleho24 collected $67.50 from pot
appleho24: doesn't show hand
Summary
Total pot $70.50 | Rake $3
Board
Seat 1: LTender (small blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: XAVIER71 (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 3: nirvanna folded on the Flop
Seat 4: Jaden4200 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 5: appleho24 collected ($67.50)
Seat 6: Four_PG folded on the Flop
Seat 7: Eerik folded on the River
Seat 8: sven1972 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 9: MARC 753 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet)
1
 |
Eerik Estonia. Jun 05 2006 11:49. Posts 1307 | | |
i don't think this is a call.
god damn how gay. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
Ket  United Kingdom. Jun 05 2006 11:54. Posts 8665 | | | |
|
|
1
|
Eerik Estonia. Jun 05 2006 11:56. Posts 1307 | | |
no really, i'd call instantly usually.
but not this time.
he had flush carved into his forehead. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
crispy4505 United States. Jun 05 2006 11:59. Posts 509 | | | |
|
|
1
|
Eerik Estonia. Jun 05 2006 12:00. Posts 1307 | | |
i'm having doubts now tho
but really, it was either a very good bluff which i think hes not capable of or a retarded valuebet for his chased flush. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
TwistedEcho United Kingdom. Jun 05 2006 12:00. Posts 3539 | | |
| | On June 05 2006 10:54 Ket wrote:
what the FUCK |
|
| |
|
|
1
|
cariadon Estonia. Jun 05 2006 12:01. Posts 4019 | | |
Ket autocall such a low bet?
maybe it was a "cheap showdown" bet from kq or something?
You can't consider raising that without the flush yourself.
gaybet for win |
|
|
1
|
Eerik Estonia. Jun 05 2006 12:04. Posts 1307 | | |
look at my betsizes.
any other 100nl player would have called his bet and he knows it.
i show strength, his bet is just aching to get paid off by two pair or maybe even a set.
he does not have the balls to bluff there, especially with a bet that small. |
| |
|
|
1
|
Ket United Kingdom. Jun 05 2006 12:04. Posts 8665 | | |
you're getting nearly 4 to 1. it doesnt matter how sure you are, 4 to 1 is too much.
i think the "obviousness" of his flush is debatable anyway since its very possible his river bet is a terrified blocking bet quite often. but even ignoring this i think folding is still awful. 4 to 1 omfg, FOUR TO ONE.
FOUR TO ONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
|
1
|
TwistedEcho United Kingdom. Jun 05 2006 12:05. Posts 3539 | | |
| | On June 05 2006 11:04 Eerik wrote:
look at my betsizes.
any other 100nl player would have called his bet and he knows it.
i show strength, his bet is just aching to get paid off by two pair or maybe even a set.
he does not have the balls to bluff there, especially with a bet that small. |
He has 9T/KT enough of the time here that its a call. |
| |
|
|
1
|
Eerik Estonia. Jun 05 2006 12:06. Posts 1307 | | |
i disagree.
i know what four to one is.
i know when im calling.
but if you see his cards its relatively easy to fold, no?;p
edit: i know what you guys are saying and i call this 99% of the time there. but not this time. |
|
| hm. | Last edit: 05/06/2006 12:07 |
|
|
1
|
Ket United Kingdom. Jun 05 2006 12:07. Posts 8665 | | |
| | On June 05 2006 11:01 cariadon wrote:
Ket autocall such a low bet?
maybe it was a "cheap showdown" bet from kq or something?
You can't consider raising that without the flush yourself.
gaybet for win |
yes.. EXTREMELY possible.
of course start laughing at the stupidness of his bet and autocall alllllllll day and night |
|
|
1
|
Eerik Estonia. Jun 05 2006 12:07. Posts 1307 | | |
okay, its just that i rarely win when a bet like this is presented.
even tho i have the odds, its never me winning ;D |
| |
|
|
1
|
cariadon Estonia. Jun 05 2006 12:09. Posts 4019 | | |
because you are never calling? ;p |
|
|
1
|
Eerik Estonia. Jun 05 2006 12:09. Posts 1307 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
|
Ket United Kingdom. Jun 05 2006 12:13. Posts 8665 | | |
| | On June 05 2006 11:07 Eerik wrote:
okay, its just that i rarely win when a bet like this is presented.
even tho i have the odds, its never me winning ;D |
thats because you're intuitively hoping to win the pot over 50% of the time, it's just how the human brain works |
|
|
1
|
Ket United Kingdom. Jun 05 2006 12:15. Posts 8665 | | |
| | On June 05 2006 11:00 Eerik wrote:
i'm having doubts now tho
but really, it was either the most fucking retarded bluff ever that somehow worked rofl which i think hes not capable of or a retarded valuebet for his chased flush. |
fyp |
|
|
1
|
Fraser Canada. Jun 05 2006 12:18. Posts 4605 | | |
i'm pretty sure u were behind here, but u should still call.
thats kinda funny tho, a bluff so bad that u cant believe its a bluff. |
|
|
1
 |
nomanirvana United States. Jun 05 2006 12:26. Posts 2523 | | |
maybe its a bad fold mathematically, maybe not...but I think its a good read |
|
|
|
