https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international Poland latinoamerica Iceland    Contact            Users: 222 Active, 10 Logged in - Time: 07:53

Show hand : 1083873

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Back Submit a hand   

Handnr: 1083873
Submitted by : drone666

PokerStars Zoom Hand #194350295304: Holdem No Limit ($2.50/$5.00) - 2018/12/11 20:38:31 ET
Table Delta Boötis 2-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: DroneHuStl3 ($652.80 in chips)
Seat 2: wazzo11 ($563.24 in chips)
DroneHuStl3: posts small blind $2.50
wazzo11: posts big blind $5

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to DroneHuStl3 AcJc
DroneHuStl3: raises $7 to $12
wazzo11: raises $42 to $54
DroneHuStl3: calls $42

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $108.00)

   AsKd5c
wazzo11: bets $20
DroneHuStl3: raises $61.53 to $81.53
wazzo11: calls $61.53

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $271.06)

   AsKd5cAd
wazzo11: checks
DroneHuStl3: bets $75.48
wazzo11: calls $75.48

River (Pot : $422.02)

   AsKd5cAdTs
wazzo11: checks
DroneHuStl3: bets $441.79 and is all-in
wazzo11 said, "vs anyone else"
wazzo11 said, "ii fold"
wazzo11: calls $352.23 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($89.56) returned to DroneHuStl3

Showdown
DroneHuStl3: shows AcJc (three of a kind, Aces)
wazzo11: shows KsJs (two pair, Aces and Kings)
DroneHuStl3 collected $1124.98 from pot

Summary
Total pot $1126.48 | Rake $1.50
Board  AsKd5cAdTs
Seat 1: DroneHuStl3 (button) (small blind) showed AcJc and won ($1124.98) with three of a kind, Aces
Seat 2: wazzo11 (big blind) showed KsJs and lost with two pair, Aces and Kings

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands
drone666   Brasil. Dec 12 2018 04:22. Posts 1674

lol @ the chat

Facebook Twitter

CamilaPunt   Brasil. Dec 12 2018 15:58. Posts 2350

lol so good


Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Dec 12 2018 17:29. Posts 8716

but i like giving you free monez


handbanana21   United States. Dec 13 2018 10:06. Posts 3019

always feels gross raising in these spots. Esp if u see the clickback.


drone666   Brasil. Dec 13 2018 10:40. Posts 1674

would be pretty comfortable getting in on the flop
he shouldnt be using small sizes on this board texture, doesnt make any sense
in theory I shouldnt be raising this texture for the same reason that he shouldnt use the small size, but he's a tool

 Last edit: 13/12/2018 10:46

Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Dec 14 2018 01:02. Posts 8716

it kinda does, since his range crushes urs and you could be underdefending vs smaller sizes... then again I dont know how he gets value when he wants to get value or how he balances small & big sizes on flop


drone666   Brasil. Dec 14 2018 02:49. Posts 1674


  On December 14 2018 00:02 Spitfiree wrote:
it kinda does, since his range crushes urs and you could be underdefending vs smaller sizes... then again I dont know how he gets value when he wants to get value or how he balances small & big sizes on flop



just no
1. from where you got the idea that is hard to defend vs small size on this board?
2. from where you got the idea that OOP range crushes IP range ?

 Last edit: 14/12/2018 02:53

lebowski   Greece. Dec 14 2018 09:51. Posts 9032

what's a solver's preferred sizing here?

new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... 

casinocasino   Canada. Dec 18 2018 16:49. Posts 3332

Big because in position player calls with any non pocket pair and any gutshot.


casinocasino   Canada. Dec 18 2018 16:50. Posts 3332

And I think it's pretty obvious OOP range crushes in position range. IP rarely has AK and almost never has AA or KK


drone666   Brasil. Dec 18 2018 17:20. Posts 1674

you are wrong, having nut range advantage doesnt mean that it has equity advantage or that it crushes
thats why it doesnt make any sense to have high frequency smaller bets, overall equities are very close on this board ( which is very unusual in 3bp, oop usually has a big advantage ) since IP range is way more Ax and Kx heavy that the equities are pretty much lockdown and OOP doesnt have the overpair advantage anymore, and has more suited crap that totally missed the board but still have some nut potential on some runouts like 76s 64s w bdfd, which fit prefectly on the big size, there's no hand that needs protection on OOP range ( 99+ doesnt have enough equity to bet for protection because IP has too much Ax and Kx ), all these are characteristics of a classic polar vs capped range and it asks for a big bet size

 Last edit: 18/12/2018 17:20

Spitfiree   Bulgaria. Dec 19 2018 00:41. Posts 8716

yeah your reasoning does make sense regarding ranges and this board


  1. from where you got the idea that is hard to defend vs small size on this board?



I didn't say its hard, I said it makes sense for him to be betting it like that cause you would have to defend with almost your entire range and could force you into a mistake.


drone666   Brasil. Dec 19 2018 09:04. Posts 1674


  On December 18 2018 23:41 Spitfiree wrote:
yeah your reasoning does make sense regarding ranges and this board

Show nested quote +



I didn't say its hard, I said it makes sense for him to be betting it like that cause you would have to defend with almost your entire range and could force you into a mistake.


yea but this board is one of the easiest to defend vs small bets, nobody will underdefend at these stakes


 

All hands submitted by drone666:








Poker Streams


















Copyright © 2019. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap