PokerStars Zoom Hand #194350295304: Holdem No Limit ($2.50/$5.00) - 2018/12/11 20:38:31 ET
Table Delta Boötis 2-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: DroneHuStl3 ($652.80 in chips)
Seat 2: wazzo11 ($563.24 in chips)
DroneHuStl3: posts small blind $2.50
wazzo11: posts big blind $5
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to DroneHuStl3 
DroneHuStl3: raises $7 to $12
wazzo11: raises $42 to $54
DroneHuStl3: calls $42
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $108.00)
wazzo11: bets $20
DroneHuStl3: raises $61.53 to $81.53
wazzo11: calls $61.53
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $271.06)
wazzo11: checks
DroneHuStl3: bets $75.48
wazzo11: calls $75.48
River (Pot : $422.02)
wazzo11: checks
DroneHuStl3: bets $441.79 and is all-in
wazzo11 said, "vs anyone else"
wazzo11 said, "ii fold"
wazzo11: calls $352.23 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($89.56) returned to DroneHuStl3
Showdown
DroneHuStl3: shows (three of a kind, Aces)
wazzo11: shows 
(two pair, Aces and Kings)
DroneHuStl3 collected $1124.98 from pot
Summary
Total pot $1126.48 | Rake $1.50
Board
Seat 1: DroneHuStl3 (button) (small blind) showed and won ($1124.98) with three of a kind, Aces
Seat 2: wazzo11 (big blind) showed and lost with two pair, Aces and Kings
1
 |
drone666 Brasil. Dec 12 2018 04:22. Posts 1821 | | | |
|
| Dont listen to anything I say | |
|
|
1
|
1
 |
Spitfiree Bulgaria. Dec 12 2018 17:29. Posts 9634 | | |
but i like giving you free monez |
|
|
1
| |
always feels gross raising in these spots. Esp if u see the clickback. |
|
|
1
|
drone666 Brasil. Dec 13 2018 10:40. Posts 1821 | | |
would be pretty comfortable getting in on the flop
he shouldnt be using small sizes on this board texture, doesnt make any sense
in theory I shouldnt be raising this texture for the same reason that he shouldnt use the small size, but he's a tool |
|
| Dont listen to anything I say | Last edit: 13/12/2018 10:46 |
|
|
1
|
Spitfiree Bulgaria. Dec 14 2018 01:02. Posts 9634 | | |
it kinda does, since his range crushes urs and you could be underdefending vs smaller sizes... then again I dont know how he gets value when he wants to get value or how he balances small & big sizes on flop |
|
|
1
|
drone666 Brasil. Dec 14 2018 02:49. Posts 1821 | | |
| | On December 14 2018 00:02 Spitfiree wrote:
it kinda does, since his range crushes urs and you could be underdefending vs smaller sizes... then again I dont know how he gets value when he wants to get value or how he balances small & big sizes on flop |
just no
1. from where you got the idea that is hard to defend vs small size on this board?
2. from where you got the idea that OOP range crushes IP range ? |
|
| Dont listen to anything I say | Last edit: 14/12/2018 02:53 |
|
|
1
|
lebowski Greece. Dec 14 2018 09:51. Posts 9205 | | |
what's a solver's preferred sizing here? |
|
| new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
|
1
| |
Big because in position player calls with any non pocket pair and any gutshot. |
|
|
1
| |
And I think it's pretty obvious OOP range crushes in position range. IP rarely has AK and almost never has AA or KK |
|
|
1
|
drone666 Brasil. Dec 18 2018 17:20. Posts 1821 | | |
you are wrong, having nut range advantage doesnt mean that it has equity advantage or that it crushes
thats why it doesnt make any sense to have high frequency smaller bets, overall equities are very close on this board ( which is very unusual in 3bp, oop usually has a big advantage ) since IP range is way more Ax and Kx heavy that the equities are pretty much lockdown and OOP doesnt have the overpair advantage anymore, and has more suited crap that totally missed the board but still have some nut potential on some runouts like 76s 64s w bdfd, which fit prefectly on the big size, there's no hand that needs protection on OOP range ( 99+ doesnt have enough equity to bet for protection because IP has too much Ax and Kx ), all these are characteristics of a classic polar vs capped range and it asks for a big bet size |
|
| Dont listen to anything I say | Last edit: 18/12/2018 17:20 |
|
|
1
|
Spitfiree Bulgaria. Dec 19 2018 00:41. Posts 9634 | | |
yeah your reasoning does make sense regarding ranges and this board
| | 1. from where you got the idea that is hard to defend vs small size on this board? |
I didn't say its hard, I said it makes sense for him to be betting it like that cause you would have to defend with almost your entire range and could force you into a mistake. |
|
|
1
|
drone666 Brasil. Dec 19 2018 09:04. Posts 1821 | | |
| | On December 18 2018 23:41 Spitfiree wrote:
yeah your reasoning does make sense regarding ranges and this board
Show nested quote +
1. from where you got the idea that is hard to defend vs small size on this board? |
I didn't say its hard, I said it makes sense for him to be betting it like that cause you would have to defend with almost your entire range and could force you into a mistake.
|
yea but this board is one of the easiest to defend vs small bets, nobody will underdefend at these stakes |
|
| Dont listen to anything I say | |
|
|
|
