https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international Poland    Contact            Users: 446 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 14:43

Show hand : 1077548

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Back Submit a hand   

Handnr: 1077548
Submitted by : Stroggoz

PokerStars Zoom Hand #176460984558: Holdem No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2017/10/03 19:48:20 ET
Table Baade 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: ThxEvolveThx ($60.70 in chips)
Seat 2: faflarage13 ($66.73 in chips)
Seat 3: Stroggos_nz ($227.71 in chips)
Seat 4: bruna_bsb ($63.61 in chips)
Seat 5: bulthaup ($78.38 in chips)
Seat 6: tomhen4 ($174.39 in chips)
faflarage13: posts small blind $0.25
Stroggos_nz: posts big blind $0.50

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Stroggos_nz TdTs
bruna_bsb: folds
bulthaup: folds
tomhen4: raises $1 to $1.50
ThxEvolveThx: folds
faflarage13: folds
Stroggos_nz: raises $4.75 to $6.25
tomhen4: calls $4.75

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $12.75)

   Kd6h8s
Stroggos_nz: bets $3.03
tomhen4: calls $3.03

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $18.81)

   Kd6h8sKh
Stroggos_nz: bets $4.47
tomhen4: calls $4.47

River (Pot : $27.75)

   Kd6h8sKhTh
Stroggos_nz: checks
tomhen4: bets $9.50
Stroggos_nz: raises $31.75 to $41.25
tomhen4: calls $31.75

Showdown
Stroggos_nz: shows TdTs (a full house, Tens full of Kings)
tomhen4: mucks hand
Stroggos_nz collected $108.25 from pot

Summary
Total pot $110.25 | Rake $2
Board  Kd6h8sKhTh
Seat 1: ThxEvolveThx (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 2: faflarage13 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: Stroggos_nz (big blind) showed TdTs and won ($108.25) with a full house, Tens full of Kings
Seat 4: bruna_bsb folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: bulthaup folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: tomhen4 mucked AdKs

Also want to share your poker hands? Register an account for free

Comments

Forum Index > pokerhands
Stroggoz   New Zealand. Oct 05 2017 09:47. Posts 5296

i fucked this hand up, shoulda jam river.

Facebook Twitter
One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings 

Nitewin   United States. Oct 05 2017 15:27. Posts 1539

What are your bluffs here where you'd jam river? Flushes jam river as well? How about Kx? Seems like you'd have too many value hands vs bluffs.


Stroggoz   New Zealand. Oct 05 2017 15:40. Posts 5296

no, flushes do not check/jam river, we are too deep for that. 3barreling flushes most likely. I mean i want to be check-jamming with TT after thinking this hand through a bit more, i raised too small.

check/jamming ATs, QTs, JTs as bluffs. when you check jam this deep your bluffs should be weighted towards blocking boats rather than flushes.

people play far from gto in these spots, at least at nl50. i'm supposed to cbet a ton since my 3bet range will be more linear than polar against a deep opponent, and since they call with all pp's, and tons of suited stuff vs my 3betting range, i have a massive range advantage, so should definitely cbet a ton here. And since i cbet a ton, they should raise flop a ton, and should do it a ton with hands like AK, but no one raises flops light in deep 3bet pots.

One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beingsLast edit: 05/10/2017 16:14

hiems   United States. Oct 05 2017 21:58. Posts 2979

if you think you should be check jamming shouldn't you be value betting more than just tt if you have a bluff range of ats,qts,jts? what hands do u think u should be using 88 and kk? or are you narrowing those bluff combos down somewhere in the hand?

I beat Loco!!! [img]https://i.imgur.com/wkwWj2d.png[/img] 

hiems   United States. Oct 05 2017 22:19. Posts 2979

also what reasons lead u to think c/jamming is the better sizing?

I beat Loco!!! [img]https://i.imgur.com/wkwWj2d.png[/img] 

 

All hands submitted by Stroggoz:






Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2024. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap