Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1077447
Submitted by : Stroggoz
PokerStars Hand #171720469171: Holdem No Limit ($25/$50 USD) - 2017/06/13 9:57:45 ET
Table Amalia II 6-max Seat #5 is the button
Seat 2: LLinusLLove ($5849.28 in chips)
Seat 4: Educa-p0ker ($6844.77 in chips)
Seat 5: Am0ral ($5352.24 in chips)
LLinusLLove: posts small blind $25
Educa-p0ker: posts big blind $50
LLinusLLove: posts the ante $10
Educa-p0ker: posts the ante $10
Am0ral: posts the ante $10
Holecards(Odds)
Am0ral: raises $75 to $125
LLinusLLove: raises $425 to $550
Educa-p0ker: folds
Am0ral: calls $425
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $1,150.00)
  
LLinusLLove: bets $801.04
Am0ral: calls $801.04
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $2,752.08)
LLinusLLove: checks
Am0ral: checks
River (Pot : $2,752.08)
LLinusLLove: bets $861.82
Am0ral: raises $3129.38 to $3991.20 and is all-in
LLinusLLove: calls $3129.38
Showdown
Am0ral: shows   (a pair of Fives)
LLinusLLove: shows   (a pair of Sixes)
LLinusLLove collected $10762.48 from pot
Summary
Total pot $10764.48 | Rake $2
Board
Seat 2: LLinusLLove (small blind) showed and won ($10762.48) with a pair of Sixes
Seat 4: Educa-p0ker (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 5: Am0ral (button) showed and lost with a pair of Fives
 |
Comments |
 |
1 | | |
|
| :D | Last edit: 01/10/2017 14:41 |
|
| 1
 |
zetzet . Oct 01 2017 17:25. Posts 37 | | |
Can somebody explain this 3/4 pot bet on flop? It seems that on this texture everyone cbets 1/4-1/3 with entire range. Just randomness? |
|
| 1
 |
Stroggoz New Zealand. Oct 01 2017 20:22. Posts 5296 | | |
not sure but possibly it's for protection. with 66 betting 1/4 you will get you floated with a lot of overcards. |
|
| One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings | |
|
| 1
 |
lebowski Greece. Oct 01 2017 20:30. Posts 9205 | | |
would be sick valueshove if amoral had 77
why does Linus bet river here 1/3?
I can almost only understand the turn plays in this hand  |
|
| new shit has come to light... a-and... shit! man... | |
|
| 1
|
zetzet . Oct 01 2017 20:44. Posts 37 | | | |
|
| | Last edit: 01/10/2017 20:45 |
|
| 1
|
Stroggoz New Zealand. Oct 01 2017 22:38. Posts 5296 | | |
| | On October 01 2017 19:30 lebowski wrote:
would be sick valueshove if amoral had 77
why does Linus bet river here 1/3?
I can almost only understand the turn plays in this hand |
Just my guess from looking at all these hh's:
River sizing is part of LinusLove's overall strategy. he doesn't really like splitting ranges here as much as other regs, so instead of checking some hands, betting some hands, betting with different sizes, ect, he chooses the smallest size that he would valuebet a hand for, and bets all his value hands with that sizing. and ofc he includes some bluffs.
Not sure but probably the ev difference between range splitting and choosing lots of different sizes and choosing this one size is quite small
It's like how regs 1/3 pot cbet some boards. you'll see that solvers say that cbetting say 1/3 pot with whole range in like a 3bet pot sb vs bu is profitable on some board textures,
but if you run a simulation and give it lots of sizings it will come up with some solution to cbet different sizings, (and it usually prefers betting bigger than 1/3 pot), and it will split ranges in a way that is only slightly more +ev than simply betting 1/3 pot, but this strategy is very difficult for a human being to do, so no one follows advice of the solver here as it's too difficult and people just bet range with 1/3 pot instead.
|
|
| One of 3 non decent human beings on a site of 5 people with between 2-3 decent human beings | |
|
| |
|
