Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1025613
Submitted by : redrain0125
PokerStars Zoom Hand #108903697127: Holdem No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2013/12/22 1:57:36 ET
Table Baade 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($138.83 in chips)
Seat 2: SpustNaMorde ($64.11 in chips)
Seat 3: BelenkiyXXX ($50 in chips)
Seat 4: lopergolo ($53.94 in chips)
Seat 5: Sparkster25 ($63.66 in chips)
Seat 6: priapizmos ($25.56 in chips)
SpustNaMorde: posts small blind $0.25
BelenkiyXXX: posts big blind $0.50
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero  
lopergolo: raises $0.50 to $1
Sparkster25: calls $1
priapizmos: folds
Hero: raises $3 to $4
SpustNaMorde: folds
BelenkiyXXX: folds
lopergolo: calls $3
Sparkster25: folds
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $9.75)
  
lopergolo: checks
Hero: bets $6
lopergolo: calls $6
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $21.75)
lopergolo: checks
Hero: checks
River (Pot : $21.75)
lopergolo: bets $43.94 and is all-in
Hero: calls $43.94
Showdown
lopergolo: shows   (two pair, Fives and Deuces)
Hero: shows (two pair, Queens and Deuces)
Hero collected $107.13 from pot
Summary
Total pot $109.63 | Rake $2.50
Board
Seat 1: Hero (button) showed and won ($107.13) with two pair, Queens and Deuces
Seat 2: SpustNaMorde (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 3: BelenkiyXXX (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: lopergolo showed and lost with two pair, Fives and Deuces
Seat 5: Sparkster25 folded before Flop
Seat 6: priapizmos folded before Flop (didnt bet)
wtf is ths?
 |
Comments |
 |
1
 |
Twisted  Netherlands. Dec 22 2013 11:08. Posts 10422 | | |
Yeah you almost didn't stack him by playing terribly on turn :o
Thank god he helped ya. |
|
| 1
| 1 | |
"Was a fish. Pretty sure he had AA after the potbet on the flop xD" |
|
| 1
 |
bigredhoss Cook Islands. Dec 22 2013 18:00. Posts 8648 | | |
this hand is not similar to twisted's if that's what you're trying to imply. |
| |
|
| 1 | | |
|
| | Last edit: 22/12/2013 18:09 |
|
| 1 | |
if he thought I should bet all streets as standard vs fish, why didn't he raise turn in his hand given the read? isnt that what he calls standard? |
|
| 1
|
bigredhoss Cook Islands. Dec 22 2013 18:45. Posts 8648 | | |
the main difference is villain being the aggressor in the other hand. i mean in twisted's hand you can make a legitimate case for playing the way he did, or raising at some point, but it's a pretty reasonable line as far as keeping villain's bluffs in + not scaring the shit out of an overpair on that board being 300+bb's deep. i doubt he would be checking back turn if he had position.
in this hand, betting turn+river gets much more value from villain's Qx+draws, and probably loses a little bit of value to 9x/mid-pp's. obviously him overbet jamming with 55 is not remotely standard even for a fish. in twisted's hand, villain overbetting river was also not standard, but him betting river was.
i mean i have to think there's at least a decent chance you had a read on this player given the obvious non-standard turn check+villain's bizarre river jam. and if so that's great, but if that's the case it doesn't make sense to go "wtf is ths" (not to mention outing a fish). |
| |
|
| |
|
