Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 1003146
Submitted by : casinocasino
okerStars Zoom Hand #94598200294: Holdem No Limit ($1/$2) - 2013/02/24 20:33:31 ET
Table Aenna 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: casinocasino ($210.78 in chips)
Seat 2: LgwZ ($262.70 in chips)
Seat 3: krissyb24 ($423.93 in chips)
Seat 4: 4DahGloRy ($123.43 in chips)
Seat 5: chikka21 ($200 in chips)
Seat 6: nagoya2005 ($546.21 in chips)
LgwZ: posts small blind $1
krissyb24: posts big blind $2
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to casinocasino  
4DahGloRy: folds
chikka21: folds
nagoya2005: folds
casinocasino: raises $2 to $4
LgwZ: raises $10 to $14
krissyb24: folds
casinocasino: raises $15 to $29
LgwZ: raises $233.70 to $262.70 and is all-in
casinocasino: calls $181.78 and is all-in
Uncalled bet ($51.92) returned to LgwZ
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $423.56)
  
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $423.56)
River (Pot : $423.56)
Showdown
LgwZ: shows   (two pair, Kings and Fours)
casinocasino: shows (a straight, Ten to Ace)
casinocasino collected $420.76 from pot
Summary
Total pot $423.56 | Rake $2.80
Board
Seat 1: casinocasino (button) showed and won ($420.76) with a straight, Ten to Ace
Seat 2: LgwZ (small blind) showed and lost with two pair, Kings and Fours
Seat 3: krissyb24 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 4: 4DahGloRy folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: chikka21 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: nagoya2005 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
 |
Comments |
 |
1
 |
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Feb 25 2013 04:18. Posts 15163 | | |
I saw this in a video on DC.
The coach there (not very good btw imo  ) "Blah123" advocated having a 3bet/shoving range of 22+ AQs+ AKo+ against people that hardly call 3bets but are way out of line with their 4bets.
Is that a good strategy?
|
| |
|
| 1
 |
Trolala Estonia. Feb 25 2013 04:45. Posts 2050 | | |
stove that range, they have a bunch of equity against vs JJ+, AK
and so do suited aces |
|
| 1 | |
its mainly for image building but that's not as useful in zoom as it would be in a regular 6 max game.
And in regards to your range, 22+ it should be 22-66 only because they have the same equity vs JJ+ as lower pocket pairs. AQ is a poor hand to get it all in without history.
also not really applicable to playing bellow mid stakes |
|
| |
|
