+16BI day, back up 9K for the month!!

how the fuck do you play 200k hands in 26 days

its the 24 tabling magic you know. Thats like 100 hours of play?

On July 26 2009 17:19 CrownRoyal wrote: how the fuck do you play 200k hands in 26 days

last blogpost he did 40k hands in 1 sess ; o

This guide I just Googled actually is pretty decent for someone who is considering playing more tables at their stakes. Although honestly I'm of the opinion that anything over 4-6 tables at least at 6M doesn't really allow you to get reads or learn and become a better player.

I agree but 9k month > reads

I honestly dont understand how u always have these gigantic swings .....

Like + 16BI in 2 K hands
or - 50BI in 20K hands
after that + 40 BI in 10 K hands

etc ...

When i run really really hot i made like 24BI in 9K hands ..... ( I believe that is my record for most BI won in a sample around 10K hands)
u seem to do +- 20BI in 10 K hands like every day ???

how is this possible ?

He plays a higher variance style than you do - by that I mean he probably 3-bets and 4-bets more often than you do.

On July 26 2009 17:46 ToTehEastSide wrote: I agree but 9k month > reads

Or by learning and working your way up the stakes you could play 17k hands and make 100k like Fayth . I think 100K in way less hours > 24 tabling. That is just a matter of opinion though. The rakeback per hour is pretty significant as well if you 24 table and actually get very good at it.

last 100k hands breakeven LOL

Monster, with every blog entry Im more scared ;o

On July 26 2009 18:18 Bejamin1 wrote: He plays a higher variance style than you do - by that I mean he probably 3-bets and 4-bets more often than you do.

Afaik he's got like 10% 3 bet pf ;o

On July 26 2009 18:31 Defrag wrote: Monster, with every blog entry Im more scared ;o Show nested quote + On July 26 2009 18:18 Bejamin1 wrote: He plays a higher variance style than you do - by that I mean he probably 3-bets and 4-bets more often than you do. Afaik he's got like 10% 3 bet pf ;o

I don't play with him at all so perhaps I should not have had an opinion on that one, but I mean what else could it be that would create such huge swings. At least in PLO the huge variance comes from players styles in 3-bet and 4-bet pots heh. Then again in PLO you get 4 cards and nobody ever folds a piece .

On July 26 2009 18:20 Bejamin1 wrote: Show nested quote + On July 26 2009 17:46 ToTehEastSide wrote: I agree but 9k month > reads Or by learning and working your way up the stakes you could play 17k hands and make 100k like Fayth . I think 100K in way less hours > 24 tabling. That is just a matter of opinion though. The rakeback per hour is pretty significant as well if you 24 table and actually get very good at it.

right ^^
if you are making 9k a month then your obviously good enough to still get reads it's just a slower process since your mass tabling
to me it all boils down to your best hourly within ur bankroll, and different strokes for different folks so w/e works

16 buyins in 1.3k hands, sick heater

Nit it the fuck up to just get to the $10k for the month and stop. I assume you don't have to keep playing till the end of july if you make it early. Lock the win up imo.

lol so sick

and I was going to post the same thing as pplus, your swings are just unreal / totally bizarre to me

btw, Joe, would u mind posting a EV graph for the month?

In his 40k hand sess last blog he has 7.6% 3bet which is pretty normal if ur playing like 4-10 tables but 24 and still 7.6% is just sick


& yeah pls monthly EV graph pls

Didnt he say a lot of the variance just comes from gambling when he doesnt have time to focus on a hand? i.e. 4betting aipf with 67s

On July 26 2009 17:39 Bejamin1 wrote: This guide I just Googled actually is pretty decent for someone who is considering playing more tables at their stakes. Although honestly I'm of the opinion that anything over 4-6 tables at least at 6M doesn't really allow you to get reads or learn and become a better player.

I believe this might be true for most people but for me i could really never play 4-6 tables unless they were for meaningful stakes to me. I feel like i can play 24 tables and still improve my play and get some reads on players. Obv I am going to miss a bunch but I have a really good memory regarding players/fish and I usually can take advatage of them well playing any amount of tables.