Pocker Aces...anyone not push here?

PokerStars Game #26528346578: Holdem No Limit ($0.02/$0.05) - 2009/03/30 8:07:44 ET
Table Pompeja IV 9-max Seat #8 is the button
Seat 1: 69vietvet ($11.94 in chips)
Seat 2: P1a9u2u2u2 ($9.20 in chips)
Seat 3: Geronimo000 ($2 in chips)
Seat 4: mmcinally ($6.70 in chips)
Seat 5: heuschrecker ($6 in chips)
Seat 6: LancePP ($5 in chips)
Seat 7: DoC.LemOn ($8.58 in chips)
Seat 8: DeeDoc ($5.23 in chips)
69vietvet: posts small blind $0.02
P1a9u2u2u2: posts big blind $0.05

Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to DoC.LemOn
Geronimo000: folds
mmcinally: folds
heuschrecker: folds
LancePP: folds
DoC.LemOn: raises $0.15 to $0.20
DeeDoc: folds
69vietvet: folds
P1a9u2u2u2: calls $0.15

Flop(Odds) (Pot : $0.42)

   
P1a9u2u2u2: bets $0.25
DoC.LemOn: raises $0.63 to $0.88
P1a9u2u2u2: raises $0.63 to $1.51
DoC.LemOn: raises $2.21 to $3.72
P1a9u2u2u2: raises $2.21 to $5.93
DoC.LemOn: raises $2.45 to $8.38 and is all-in
P1a9u2u2u2: calls $2.45

Turn(Odds) (Pot : $17.18)

   

River (Pot : $17.18)

   

Showdown
P1a9u2u2u2: shows (two pair, Sevens and Fives)
DoC.LemOn: mucks hand
P1a9u2u2u2 collected $16.33 from pot

Summary
Total pot $17.18 | Rake $0.85
Board  
Seat 1: 69vietvet (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: P1a9u2u2u2 (big blind) showed and won ($16.33) with two pair, Sevens and Fives
Seat 3: Geronimo000 folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 4: mmcinally folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 5: heuschrecker folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 6: LancePP folded before Flop (didnt bet)
Seat 7: DoC.LemOn mucked
Seat 8: DeeDoc (button) folded before Flop (didnt bet)

0 votes

u have no choice due to pot odds? first of all, this is 200 bb deep so be a bit more careful, you didn't give any reads, if this is one of those guys who is like 10/8 this is really bad, i dunno. this is NOT a standard stackoff.

the correct play should be to tank fold to his flop 3-bet.

I'd call his flop bet and probably calldown if he doesnt shove on river.I doubt your hand is good if you get it in on the flop...
As matter of fact I think you hit the bottom of his stacking range here since you have decent equity vs 2pair.I'd expect to see him having set 80%+ here...

Yeah guys, and the reads... he was your 50/10 standard NL5 player.

But even then, aces syndrome strikes gain I guess.So many times I look at simmilar hands and just laught at how people play aces like it was a straight flush made of two cards and than I do the same stupid thing.

just keep in mind basically the most overwhelming factor of why this is not .. at least a pretty damn strong consideration to shove, is how deep it is. u know, as deepness increases, how fucken careful you are goes up similarly

Wow rockman, I actually never considered the deepness really, as I usually am the one of the few who is deep at the table.

Risking 200bb with an overpair in a limit that I own 8BB/100 on average was even worse that I saw it on the table. I will just raise once and flat against donks next time, and see what he does on turn.

do not play that mechanically.

i started NL2 just limping PP 21 tables cbet HU and bet bet shove when i hit a set. raising TT+.

then i started adding other hands and stuff. NL2 -> NL5 was very easy, i moved up there in 3 days and then went to NL10. but at NL10 i was losing.

NL5>NL10 is a lot harder than NL10>NL25 becayse at NL2/NL5 ur just playing ur hands for VALUE, people always do stupid shit so it makes no sense to hand read.

But at NL10 u have to play poker. hand reading, bet sizing... thats why NL10 is harder. u cant just bot it and play by formula. i run at 6.6 ptbb on NL10 over 30k hands so its possible to win at NL10 FR

gl