1 | |
Hi,
i was talking with a friend lately about poker & bot especially cash game bot (we dont even know if that thing exist atm?). Anyway, i defended the fact that a bot at NL5 FR programmed to:
- auto-shove preflop JJ+, AKs,AKo
- set mine all others PP and when hit bet pot every street
...will be a winning bot at this limit. Notice the bot can only do these moves and nothing else. Of course he wasnt agree but he couldnt explain why. So we need more opinions.
What do you think?
|
|
| | Last edit: 12/02/2009 11:18 |
|
| 1
 |
Patrocle France. Feb 12 2009 11:48. Posts 623 | | |
compute rake paid vs probability your hands do hold => you lose money without rakeback.
(at this specific level). |
|
| An apple a day keeps the doctor away | |
|
| 1
 |
NewbSaibot United States. Feb 12 2009 12:14. Posts 4948 | | |
I know its NL5, but I dont ever remember seeing too many people open shove that much, so I dont think you're ever gonna get paid off there. As for set mining, well youre not gonna hit that very often either, so I think this bot would just blind itself to death. |
| |
|
| 1
|
Patrocle France. Feb 12 2009 13:22. Posts 623 | | |
| | On February 12 2009 10:48 Patrocle wrote:
compute rake paid vs probability your hands do hold => you lose money without rakeback.
(at this specific level). |
I don't know if you see my point, but, just make the maths here, do not rely on your instincts. Put the percentage of hands played, the probability they hold on average (depending on the numbers of people you are playing on average), the average money you get, and you get your winrate.
Dont forget you cant always set-mine (after your call someone squeeze, what are you doing ?), and a set hold to the river approximatevely 68/72%, and also don't always get paid off.
In brief: make the maths, with such a gameplan, computing winrate is easy. |
|
| An apple a day keeps the doctor away | |
|
| 1 | |
i'll do the math merci pour ton avis. |
|
| |
|
Contact Users: 684 Active, 0 Logged in - Time: 18:01
,
,
,
,