1
 |
BJLTNYK   United States. Nov 25 2008 23:42. Posts 1226 | | |
For some assinine reason I'm still using PT2...I'm tired of it...do I want PT3 or HEM and why? kthx
Also:
BEWBS

|
|
SmartFAB: lol u are the worst play in history of online poker bj | |
|
|
1
 |
Exhilarate   United States. Nov 26 2008 00:00. Posts 5453 | | |
i suggest HEM, the hud is way faster, and the positional stats are nice |
|
|
1
 |
Silver_nz   New Zealand. Nov 26 2008 00:08. Posts 5647 | | |
PT3 is buggy, but nice when it decides to work. for me it shits itself and dies about once per day under heavy use |
|
|
1
 |
TenBagger   United States. Nov 26 2008 00:29. Posts 2018 | | |
HEM
and using PT2 is not quite as assinine as holding on to calderon's 100% FT% when howard dooms you to last in FTs anyway. |
|
|
1
| |
| On November 25 2008 23:00 Exhilarate wrote:
i suggest HEM, the hud is way faster, and the positional stats are nice |
|
|
|
1
 |
BJLTNYK   United States. Nov 26 2008 00:49. Posts 1226 | | |
| On November 25 2008 23:29 TenBagger wrote:
HEM
and using PT2 is not quite as assinine as holding on to calderon's 100% FT% when howard dooms you to last in FTs anyway. |
joe calderon has a pretty decent a/t ratio i heard |
|
SmartFAB: lol u are the worst play in history of online poker bj | |
|
|
1
 |
whamm!   Albania. Nov 26 2008 01:56. Posts 11625 | | |
ptthreeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee |
|
|
1
| |
hem is ugly and hard to read but has more functions afaik. both huds crash on me. ummmmmm id go pt3 but its close |
|
|
1
 |
sirracksalot   United States. Nov 26 2008 17:21. Posts 2299 | | |
|
|
|
|