1
 |
gawdawaful   Canada. Feb 09 2008 05:49. Posts 9014 | | |

my leak is that I run bad lol
|
|
| Im only good at poker when I run good | |
|
|
1
 |
Moffa   United States. Feb 09 2008 06:13. Posts 617 | | | |
|
| Dangerous, but worth the risk. | |
|
|
1
 |
ggplz   Sweden. Feb 09 2008 06:14. Posts 16784 | | |
stop floating with T6 in 3 bet pots
i know its suited but come on! |
|
| if poker is dangerous to them i would rank sports betting as a Kodiak grizzly bear who smells blood after you just threw a javelin into his cub - RaiNKhAN | |
|
|
1
 |
gawdawaful   Canada. Feb 09 2008 06:15. Posts 9014 | | |
nigga plz, I was chasing a flush draw |
|
| Im only good at poker when I run good | |
|
|
1
 |
androidmetro   United States. Feb 09 2008 07:04. Posts 140 | | | |
|
|
1
 |
Steal City   United States. Feb 09 2008 10:36. Posts 2537 | | |
i was like, this graph is impossible... till i saw it only consists of 160 hands |
|
| Intersango.com intersango.com | |
|
|
1
 |
Bejamin1   Canada. Feb 09 2008 10:50. Posts 7042 | | |
| | On February 09 2008 09:36 Steal City wrote:
i was like, this graph is impossible... till i saw it only consists of 160 hands |
It's not 160 hands. It's all his all-ins over a much larger sample of hands. This is just taking hands where he went all-in with his opponent, and then his chance of winning the pot was multiplied by the money in the pot. It is an exact calculation of all-in luck.
I have similar all-in luck myself which is drastically different than the average. However I think the reality is that as with my all-in graph over the course of 160 all-ins you should have an expected all-in value of way over $600 positive if you're playing well. Someone pointed this out to me with one my similar posted graphs and theres a lot of merit to it. You should be getting way more all-in expected value than $600 over the what like 5-10k hands I suppose that is a calculation for?
Work on bringing up the expected value of your all-ins and you might see that turn around I suppose, I'm doing the same currently. |
|
| Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama | |
|
|
1
 |
collegesucks   United States. Feb 09 2008 12:46. Posts 5780 | | |
do something nice and feed your karma |
|
|
1
 |
gawdawaful   Canada. Feb 09 2008 15:03. Posts 9014 | | |
| | On February 09 2008 09:50 Bejamin1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 09 2008 09:36 Steal City wrote:
i was like, this graph is impossible... till i saw it only consists of 160 hands |
It's not 160 hands. It's all his all-ins over a much larger sample of hands. This is just taking hands where he went all-in with his opponent, and then his chance of winning the pot was multiplied by the money in the pot. It is an exact calculation of all-in luck.
I have similar all-in luck myself which is drastically different than the average. However I think the reality is that as with my all-in graph over the course of 160 all-ins you should have an expected all-in value of way over $600 positive if you're playing well. Someone pointed this out to me with one my similar posted graphs and theres a lot of merit to it. You should be getting way more all-in expected value than $600 over the what like 5-10k hands I suppose that is a calculation for?
Work on bringing up the expected value of your all-ins and you might see that turn around I suppose, I'm doing the same currently.
|
You should see where my redline is after 46k hands lol
And yes, this is all the hands where we went all-in before river or w/e for this month, probably 16k hands of 1/2 |
|
| Im only good at poker when I run good | |
|
|
1
 |
shaw67193   United States. Feb 09 2008 18:22. Posts 465 | | |
sick graph  |
|
| YO MAN YOU GOTTA LEARN THE HUSTLE MAN I KNOW HOW YOU FEEL AND IM LIKE YO I GOTTA STAY MOTIVATED CAUSE THESE COWARDS NEED TO GET STOMPED BOTTOM LINE -nolan | |
|
|
|