https://www.liquidpoker.net/


LP international    Contact            Users: 860 Active, 2 Logged in - Time: 20:46

Found a leak

New to LiquidPoker? Register here for free!
Forum Index > Poker Blogs
gawdawaful   Canada. Feb 09 2008 05:49. Posts 9014


my leak is that I run bad lol

0 votes
Facebook Twitter
Im only good at poker when I run good 

Moffa   United States. Feb 09 2008 06:13. Posts 617

lol, find a plug yo.

Dangerous, but worth the risk. 

ggplz   Sweden. Feb 09 2008 06:14. Posts 16784

stop floating with T6 in 3 bet pots
i know its suited but come on!

if poker is dangerous to them i would rank sports betting as a Kodiak grizzly bear who smells blood after you just threw a javelin into his cub - RaiNKhAN 

gawdawaful   Canada. Feb 09 2008 06:15. Posts 9014

nigga plz, I was chasing a flush draw

Im only good at poker when I run good 

androidmetro   United States. Feb 09 2008 07:04. Posts 140

You're awesome, bro.


Steal City   United States. Feb 09 2008 10:36. Posts 2537

i was like, this graph is impossible... till i saw it only consists of 160 hands

Intersango.com intersango.com  

Bejamin1   Canada. Feb 09 2008 10:50. Posts 7042


  On February 09 2008 09:36 Steal City wrote:
i was like, this graph is impossible... till i saw it only consists of 160 hands



It's not 160 hands. It's all his all-ins over a much larger sample of hands. This is just taking hands where he went all-in with his opponent, and then his chance of winning the pot was multiplied by the money in the pot. It is an exact calculation of all-in luck.

I have similar all-in luck myself which is drastically different than the average. However I think the reality is that as with my all-in graph over the course of 160 all-ins you should have an expected all-in value of way over $600 positive if you're playing well. Someone pointed this out to me with one my similar posted graphs and theres a lot of merit to it. You should be getting way more all-in expected value than $600 over the what like 5-10k hands I suppose that is a calculation for?

Work on bringing up the expected value of your all-ins and you might see that turn around I suppose, I'm doing the same currently.

Sorry dude he Jason Bourned me. -Johnny Drama 

collegesucks   United States. Feb 09 2008 12:46. Posts 5780

do something nice and feed your karma


gawdawaful   Canada. Feb 09 2008 15:03. Posts 9014


  On February 09 2008 09:50 Bejamin1 wrote:
Show nested quote +



It's not 160 hands. It's all his all-ins over a much larger sample of hands. This is just taking hands where he went all-in with his opponent, and then his chance of winning the pot was multiplied by the money in the pot. It is an exact calculation of all-in luck.

I have similar all-in luck myself which is drastically different than the average. However I think the reality is that as with my all-in graph over the course of 160 all-ins you should have an expected all-in value of way over $600 positive if you're playing well. Someone pointed this out to me with one my similar posted graphs and theres a lot of merit to it. You should be getting way more all-in expected value than $600 over the what like 5-10k hands I suppose that is a calculation for?

Work on bringing up the expected value of your all-ins and you might see that turn around I suppose, I'm doing the same currently.


You should see where my redline is after 46k hands lol
And yes, this is all the hands where we went all-in before river or w/e for this month, probably 16k hands of 1/2

Im only good at poker when I run good 

shaw67193   United States. Feb 09 2008 18:22. Posts 465

sick graph

YO MAN YOU GOTTA LEARN THE HUSTLE MAN I KNOW HOW YOU FEEL AND IM LIKE YO I GOTTA STAY MOTIVATED CAUSE THESE COWARDS NEED TO GET STOMPED BOTTOM LINE -nolan 

 



Poker Streams

















Copyright © 2025. LiquidPoker.net All Rights Reserved
Contact Advertise Sitemap