1
 |
Currency   New Zealand. Feb 27 2010 21:23. Posts 618 | | |
| On February 27 2010 19:20 animaniacs wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 27 2010 18:21 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
| On February 27 2010 18:08 CamilaPunt wrote:
thats a really high variance call where u might have a slight advantage
not worth imo
guy does that with KQ then he is bad enough to make mistakes in spots where u will have a clearer edge... |
What does that even mean, I am ahead of his range, the call is easily +ev
|
being +ev doesn't make it the right play |
lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll |
|
|
1
 |
dahornnn   United Kingdom. Feb 27 2010 21:56. Posts 693 | | |
Im sorry, but isnt it about getting any edge you can in ev and going with it? |
|
|
1
 |
gs.RO   United States. Feb 27 2010 22:57. Posts 84 | | |
| On February 27 2010 18:08 CamilaPunt wrote:
thats a really high variance call where u might have a slight advantage
not worth imo
guy does that with KQ then he is bad enough to make mistakes in spots where u will have a clearer edge... |
|
|
|
1
 |
Zalfor   United States. Feb 27 2010 23:00. Posts 2236 | | |
dont get it in if ur not willing to handle the variance imo |
|
|
1
 |
Augury   United States. Feb 27 2010 23:15. Posts 222 | | |
That's rough, good job going with a read though, glad it semi worked out :D lol |
|
|
|
1
 |
Stroggos   New Zealand. Feb 27 2010 23:54. Posts 1117 | | |
good call, don't listen to those h8ters. |
|
|
1
 |
edzwoo   United States. Feb 28 2010 00:44. Posts 5911 | | |
Lots of confused advice going on here.
| On February 27 2010 20:23 Currency wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 27 2010 19:20 animaniacs wrote:
| On February 27 2010 18:21 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
| On February 27 2010 18:08 CamilaPunt wrote:
thats a really high variance call where u might have a slight advantage
not worth imo
guy does that with KQ then he is bad enough to make mistakes in spots where u will have a clearer edge... |
What does that even mean, I am ahead of his range, the call is easily +ev
|
being +ev doesn't make it the right play |
lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll |
Not sure why you're laughing at this. Min-raising AA pre is going to be +EV but nobody would say it's the right play.
In cash games you CAN be in spots where waiting would be a better choice. There are outside considerations you have to take into account as well, such as only being able to buy back in for $50 therefore losing potential value in each hand you play against the fish. The other is if you lose this pot, the fish might insta sitout and leave, which is of course changes the table from ++++++++++++EV to +EV.
That being said I think it's fine to ship it here if you're confident you're way ahead of his range. Judging by the stacks on the table, it looks like a lot of people are ready to ship it with something decent themselves and aren't going to let you whittle away his stack with AA. |
|
|
1
| |
| On February 27 2010 18:08 CamilaPunt wrote:
thats a really high variance call where u might have a slight advantage
not worth imo
guy does that with KQ then he is bad enough to make mistakes in spots where u will have a clearer edge... |
and
| On February 27 2010 23:44 edzwoo wrote:
Not sure why you're laughing at this. Min-raising AA pre is going to be +EV but nobody would say it's the right play.
|
|
|
|
1
 |
Stroggos   New Zealand. Feb 28 2010 03:10. Posts 1117 | | |
this call could be worth +5K or -5K in like half a years time because it is such high variance. meh, if i was 60/40 against his range i'd call. |
|
|
1
 |
NewbSaibot   United States. Feb 28 2010 05:22. Posts 4947 | | |
|
|
|
1
 |
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Feb 28 2010 05:53. Posts 15163 | | |
| On February 27 2010 23:44 edzwoo wrote:
Lots of confused advice going on here.
Show nested quote +
On February 27 2010 20:23 Currency wrote:
| On February 27 2010 19:20 animaniacs wrote:
| On February 27 2010 18:21 LemOn[5thF] wrote:
| On February 27 2010 18:08 CamilaPunt wrote:
thats a really high variance call where u might have a slight advantage
not worth imo
guy does that with KQ then he is bad enough to make mistakes in spots where u will have a clearer edge... |
What does that even mean, I am ahead of his range, the call is easily +ev
|
being +ev doesn't make it the right play |
lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll |
Not sure why you're laughing at this. Min-raising AA pre is going to be +EV but nobody would say it's the right play.
. |
Are you being sarcastic Edzwoo? I hope you are, because that has nothing to do with this hand.
(for those that didn't get Edzwoo's joke: When you minraise AA preflop, you are losing value because there are more +ev choices/ actions.
You can only call or fold here)
This guy limp called direct shove with T4o, and directly shoved preflop at random times. In addition he just lost a large pot, after which he always does something crazy and his shoving range is even wider.
If you know anything about poker this is a snap call even with 'only' 10% edge above his range. |
|
93% Sure! | Last edit: 28/02/2010 07:57 |
|
|
1
 |
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Feb 28 2010 06:04. Posts 15163 | | |
And even if I do lose, I have position and he wasn't going anywhere.
I took back 6BI off of him after that hand. |
|
93% Sure! | Last edit: 28/02/2010 07:13 |
|
|
1
 |
NewbSaibot   United States. Feb 28 2010 16:43. Posts 4947 | | |
what if he raised you your LIFE lemon? Then what? |
|
|
|
1
 |
LemOn[5thF]   Czech Republic. Mar 01 2010 15:36. Posts 15163 | | |
| On February 28 2010 15:43 NewbSaibot wrote:
what if he raised you your LIFE lemon? Then what? |
Well then I fold duh -.-
No money can be weighted against my life and I will not get any gain from his death, on the contrary.
Nothing can match infinity value I place on my life
So the call would be -ev |
|
93% Sure! | Last edit: 01/03/2010 15:36 |
|
|
|