1
 |
joLin   United States. Feb 03 2010 21:32. Posts 3818 | | |
ive learned the hard way to believe ppl when they tell me this on the turn. |
| |
|
|
1
| |
fold turn definately
as played, call river. shoving is a spew |
|
|
1
 |
Jas0n   United States. Feb 03 2010 22:48. Posts 1866 | | |
I think that river raise is fine just because this is nl10, but villain is showing a lot of strength with that turn minbet/raise. |
|
|
1
 |
Sicks Macks   United States. Feb 04 2010 01:38. Posts 3929 | | |
| | On February 03 2010 17:05 MadJukes wrote:
I've almost always seen a limp/call from UTG low pocket pairs. |
All competent players and tons of fish raise any pocket pair from utg in 6-max. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
4kinggenius   United Kingdom. Feb 04 2010 04:00. Posts 317 | | |
JoLin and Sicks Macks have it spot on here imo.... |
|
| NL1K is only ever one drink away...... | |
|
|
1
 |
FeARFaCT   United States. Feb 04 2010 12:31. Posts 496 | | |
You seem to be playing mostly level 0 in this hand with some really ill based level 1 thoughts. Just because we hit a flush on the river doesn't mean we just jam. We seem to have taken no consideration as to what he really has here. Saying sets/flushes/KQ+ and whatever else you listed is pretty ridiculous imo. Nobody plays KQ or AQ like this, and why would he pot the river when it's clear that a draw is a huge part of your range if he just has TPTK. I don't even really think many low flushes are part of his range either. It seems more polarized to boats/maybe some A3 type hand and air if he bluffs, also could have Ax flush. This river call is more of a bluff catcher than it is a shove for value assuming he's not a spew fish.
Also if anything, his pf stats indicate he is a more competent player so why would he do this with a hand like QT/KQ etc? The ranges you are assigning people isn't close either, you need to completely open them up. Saying he never has a low PP here is absolutely absurd, and like I said hands like A3s are easily in his range as well.
"I think that river raise is fine just because this is nl10, but villain is showing a lot of strength with that turn minbet/raise."
- This is also a semi ignorant statement. Granted it is nl10, but that just means there are more spewy fish at the tables as a generality. If this opponent isn't one, which by seeing his PTR he's absolutely not, then this is a horrible idea. There are plenty of competent weak/tight nits at 10nl as well who would never take this line with a low flush or KQ. Villain is showing a lot of strength with that turn minbet/raise - yes you have it absolutely correct, which means he doesn't show up with mid range hands here. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
Critterer   United Kingdom. Feb 04 2010 12:36. Posts 5337 | | |
the problem is hes telling us he has what HE percieves to be the nuts
a player taking a line like minbet/minraise on the turn could believe QK is the nuts here so id probably ship it in |
|
| LudaHid: dam.ned dam.ned dam.ned. LudaHid: dam.ned northwooden as..hole | |
|
|
1
 |
goose58   United States. Feb 04 2010 13:01. Posts 871 | | |
no reads im super excited about river and i shipshove almost everytime
to the people saying OMG HE HAS A BOAT ... you need history with an opponent to make claims like that |
|
|
1
 |
joLin   United States. Feb 04 2010 13:57. Posts 3818 | | |
| | On February 04 2010 11:36 Critterer wrote:
the problem is hes telling us he has what HE percieves to be the nuts
a player taking a line like minbet/minraise on the turn could believe QK is the nuts here so id probably ship it in |
have you ever seen a hand like KQ when looking ppl up in this spot? bcuz i never ever have. |
| |
|
|
1
 |
Fayth   Canada. Feb 04 2010 16:35. Posts 10085 | | |
I think shoving is like lighting money on fire but whatever |
|
| Im not sure what to do tomorrow when I see her, should I shake her hand?? -Floofy | |
|
|
1
 |
SPEWTARD   Peru. Feb 04 2010 17:47. Posts 4307 | | | |
| |
|
|
1
 |
XDsCrazy   Canada. Feb 04 2010 17:58. Posts 64 | | |
min bet in this pot + re-raise = ultimate nuts like 95% of the time |
| |
|
|
1
 |
freezes   United States. Feb 04 2010 19:37. Posts 26 | | |
| | On February 03 2010 14:58 NewbSaibot wrote:
If he has a boat then you should fold. Same thing with ace high flush (even king high when you think about it). But if you have him beat, then getting it allin is a good result, but only if you win. |
Yes if somehow you know exactly what was his hand you should make the specific move according to it. How could i have been so blind. |
|
| | Last edit: 04/02/2010 19:41 |
|
|
1
| |
i raise all pp's...I think most do in 6 max... |
|
| You see...whenever I start feeling sick...I just stop being sick...and be awesome instead...true story... | |
|
|
5
 |
Nazgul   Netherlands. Feb 04 2010 20:15. Posts 7080 | | |
shove is just incredibly bad poker, you could argue for whatever point before that but the shove on the river is a ridiculously huge leak that should be addressed before anything else |
|
| You almost twin-caracked his AK - JonnyCosmo | Last edit: 04/02/2010 20:15 |
|
|
1
|
1
| |
when people say "just ship it in it's nl10", don't listen to that. that kind of mentality will lose you a lot of money, unless you have an overpair vs a fish or something
his turn minraise is just screaming strength, and he is not taking this line with some random queen.
results?] |
|
| | Last edit: 05/02/2010 10:49 |
|
|
1
 |
MadJukes   United States. Feb 05 2010 10:53. Posts 372 | | |
| | On February 05 2010 09:41 Into Infinity wrote:
when people say "just ship it in it's nl10", don't listen to that. that kind of mentality will lose you a lot of money, unless you have an overpair vs a fish or something
his turn minraise is just screaming strength, and he is not taking this line with some random queen.
results?] |
I think I'm really going to take that and use it. I've been playing much more "ship it with any flush/boat" style because several people on LP tell me it's always the +EV move at NL2 to NL25 in places that I would sometimes lay them down.
Results:
+ Show Spoiler +
He showed up with the last 2 queens. Last hand I expected, especially bc of combinatorics.
Thanks to everyone who commented on this hand-- it gave me a plethora of insight on how this hand can be viewed.
|
|
| | Last edit: 05/02/2010 10:54 |
|
|
|