Gates $10B Donation - Page 4

Donald I dont know what you are trying to teach me with your wiki link, its not like it defies anything I have said.

On January 30 2010 02:40 Steal City wrote: is it a bad policy, i dont know could african countries right now realistically implement it (logistically speaking), probably not might it do more harm then good, very possibly is it a treatment of the symptoms and not the the main problems, most definitely might treating the symptoms cause the country to heal enough to have a spill over effect that fixes the root problems, possibly talking about something likely impractical and maybe not good for africa and certainly unlikely to be better than the current route (because of the logistics at the very least and government power of implementation)... is silly, don't waste time and i'm tired of being people's teacher no offense zorglub but ur exactly the type of guy i was talking about. I care about this thread but I'm going to treat people who comment on stuff that they haven't put a few minutes thought into as trolls and not respond from now on.

No offense but people "teaching" and calling others braindead, in a discussion without a solution, are usually the ones who apply to their own profanities

lol ur obviously brain dead. Ur the one not providing a solution btw, I'm defending a position or at least saying that we shouldn't be judgemental without reason. You're the one being judgemental and offer half baked or simply incorrect reasoning.
and if you can't read the wiki page then just stop using it as an example because it's not. Not going to repond to troll posts

it's amazing i get flamed for showing how stupid it is to donate to relief funds in Haiti which is obvious and also get flamed saying people are too critical of Bill Gates

honestly ur mind must be very twisted if u support donating to Haiti emergency relief fund and attack Bill Gates saying his donations are bad without any reasoning

Gates is the man.

Seriously i make more sense drunk than most sober people in this thread

On January 30 2010 06:10 Spitfiree wrote: Seriously i make more sense drunk than most sober people in this thread

i don't think donating and not caring if your donation is helpful at all is sensical but that is what u admitted to in the Haiti thread after not having made sense for pages and then finally realizing the true nature of the situation. U should be the last person to make fun of zorglub for not making sense

not sure what side of the argument ur on with this thread but u especially shouldn't be critical of Gates.

Maybe ur just saying the people trying to say overpopulation has any relevance are being nonsensical, if so, ur correct but u've made even more crazy statements

Steal City you cry to make me insult you
try reading my post before you comment seriously
calling people stupid and then commenting on something u havent read is just ...

srsly you tilt me you r prolly the only guy here that could make me think that he s retarded->genious-> retarded in 3 posts

On January 29 2010 18:02 Zorglub wrote: If this goes on, it will end in a tragedy

All I see here is:

Vaccines help create more industrialized countries, and the industrialized ones are, according to this, not pumping out as many babies. PRESTO CHANGE-O, ALL PROBLEMS SOLVED

On January 30 2010 07:23 Spitfiree wrote: Steal City you cry to make me insult you try reading my post before you comment seriously calling people stupid and then commenting on something u havent read is just ... srsly you tilt me you r prolly the only guy here that could make me think that he s retarded->genious-> retarded in 3 posts

ur post is ambiguous, i also addressed this in my reply to ur post.

overpopulation will correct itself... :D
Gates is awesome.

You dissapoint me Donald, I thought you would be able to argue as an adult

DONT YOU SEE YOU ARENT TALKING SENSE. THIS ISNT SCIENCE BUT PSEUDO SCIENCE BASED ON DATA FROM THE 50's.

there is no first world, developing world and third world. its a spectrum of converging countries. this is the kind of arguments people spout who have no knowledge on the subject at all.

baller

He should start a rake free poker site next imo.

On January 30 2010 08:58 Zorglub wrote: You dissapoint me Donald, I thought you would be able to argue as an adult

sry buvt if u read the Haiti thread u'll know why i'm pissed. + i can't argue if you don't pose and argument

Btw i also wonder if a part of him did this coz Steve Jobs just released his new product so he can take media's attention off him

bill gates doesnt work for microsoft anymore

On January 30 2010 13:11 genjix wrote: bill gates doesnt work for microsoft anymore

but hes still on the board of directors and i assume he owns a pretty big chunk of shares still

The problem with "overpopulation" isn't that 'zomg we're going to run out of natural resources' or 'zomg we're going to crowd the earth until we all have 1 square meter to live on.' The problem is that when you start having 5+ children to one family, that's a lot of mouths to feed and that's a lot of work to be done which means the children are going to have to start working instead of going to school. Also the more children you have, the less resources you can spare for each one's education so maybe only 1-2 if any of the kids will be able to go to school. Typically it's the role of the children to care for the parents when they become elderly since there's no retirement homes to do so. It definitely contributes to the cycle of poverty but I think it's common sense that they have that many children because they are poor. They aren't poor because they have that many children.