I LOVE THIS GUY

I mean, 35 minutes of tv time, the last 2 to say whatever he likes
he MUST be doing something right

I am enjoying watching this so much that I sent you a pm

<3

god this is SO good

yes he really is the shit and I hope by 2012 America changes their fundamental beliefs and starts to see him for what he is and he gets what he deserves.
This is also why I'm all for Obama being Obama
people will eventually get sick of the merry go round and hopefully grow up

not surprising that you love ron paul =) and the fact that you think of beck as anything other than a crazy moron is pretty funny as well. did you host a watch party for glenn beck friday?

EDIT: On a serious note, I like ron paul too. I actually agree with him a lot more than I do with any other republicans. That's probably cause he's a libertarian and I like a lot of basic Libertarian views. But the stuff I disagree with ron paul on is also really big. Like I do believe in aid and helping other countries, and Ron Paul is very strict libertarian on his view that we shouldn't pay attention to anything outside the US. So when he starts bitching against the iraq war I'm with him, but his reason for being against him is different than mine. End result the same which is nice, but the reason behind it being different means that he's also against things like pressuring china in regards to Tibet, and I think he's wrong there.

I'm sure it's as surprising as how surprised I am of seeing how naturally and often u use the word crazy when talking about another view opposite of your own
hope for your sake it's not a "yell fire on someone else to take away the attention of your own fire" type strategy you're using
I'd expect more from you than that.

and to answer ur q, no I'm not a huge fan of glen beck, tho he does have his moments as at least he isn't 125% teleprompter

a watch party...haha I wonder who actually has those, Glen Beck or Obama?
look look yall shhhhhhhhhhhhhhh its THE MAN
see?? he reads goot!1!!!

crap, how did I not see ur edit?

what kinda things are u in agreement with him with? seems so strange
I see it was asked in your transparency blog, I'm tempted to move that blog into here if your up for discussion though I was about to call it a day

personally I think before you can help others, you must be able to help yourself first

ok, I'm like falling asleep at the wheel here and about to be incoherent so tbc sometime if u like
but before I go just 2 things

First is all except for the original post and the last post were me jabbing back with u k2o4

Second is a curiosity question for you..
Are you for the New World Order?
I know that you are very much for a bigger federal government yes?

On March 18 2009 09:36 ToTehEastSide wrote: I'm sure it's as surprising as how surprised I am of seeing how naturally and often u use the word crazy when talking about another view opposite of your own

I say that about glenn beck cause he's constantly encouraging conspiracy theories against Obama and saying ridiculous shit.

a watch party...haha I wonder who actually has those, Glen Beck or Obama?

Glenn Beck actually.... Chuck norris even held one!

On March 18 2009 09:43 ToTehEastSide wrote: what kinda things are u in agreement with him with? seems so strange

He talks about achieving change through non-violence and a respect for ghandi and MLK. I'm with him there. He talks about the reasons for terrorist hate towards the USA and how it's not about our freedom but more our intervention in the mideast with things like bases in saudi arabia and so on. He's dead on with that stuff. He respects the states right to make decisions which I also agree with.

On March 18 2009 10:14 ToTehEastSide wrote: Second is a curiosity question for you.. Are you for the New World Order? I know that you are very much for a bigger federal government yes?

What the hell is the New World Order? Do you mean the conspiracy theory from the other video you posted? Hard to be for something that I don't understand and probably doesn't exist =)

I'm for govt taking care of basic needs, like healthcare. I personally think the healthcare system is a fucking mess in the USA and am for universal health care. But I'm still a bit of a dick on it - like I think if you get bitten by a mosquito and get malaria you should be able to go to the hospital for free and get all the drugs and so on for free. But if you get lung cancer cause you smoked cigarettes all of your life, you should have to pay for treatment. If you do stupid shit that gets you sick/injured, that's your own damn fault so you should have to pay for it. But if you just get sick / injured cause life sux and people get sick/injured, that should be taken care of as a perk of being an american.

how can you say "i dont understand and probably doesnt exist" that is ridiculous, first of all, because its not hard to understand at all, if you would have seen any information about it, you would understand it, or at least ask questions before you say things like "it probably doesnt exists".

"New World Order" is more of a conspiracy theory than anything though, and it sort of distracts from actual issues that people should be looking at. Just the mere mention of the term makes you look like somewhat of a lunatic as well, so I guess its an issue thats best avoided. Is the world moving towards large, multi-national governmental control? Yes, I'd say thats a fairly sound conclusion. Is that move being directed by some "illuminati"-like group? I think thats where the 'new world order' theories cross the line into absurdity.

On March 18 2009 10:32 k2o4 wrote: Show nested quote + On March 18 2009 10:14 ToTehEastSide wrote: Second is a curiosity question for you.. Are you for the New World Order? I know that you are very much for a bigger federal government yes? I'm for govt taking care of basic needs, like healthcare. I personally think the healthcare system is a fucking mess in the USA and am for universal health care. But I'm still a bit of a dick on it - like I think if you get bitten by a mosquito and get malaria you should be able to go to the hospital for free and get all the drugs and so on for free. But if you get lung cancer cause you smoked cigarettes all of your life, you should have to pay for treatment. If you do stupid shit that gets you sick/injured, that's your own damn fault so you should have to pay for it. But if you just get sick / injured cause life sux and people get sick/injured, that should be taken care of as a perk of being an american.

You really need to consider whether or not your views make sense logically, I think. If someone gets bitten by a mosquito and gets malaria, they've taken some sort of risk that puts them into the position to get malaria in the first place. So by that fact, they have a certain amount of responsibility in getting the disease, and why should they deserve "free" treatment any more than the smoker? At what point do you consider people to know the risks they are taking, and therefore to have chosen to have the disease they have? If I choose to go on a trip to the Amazon or something, and there is a much higher chance of getting malaria there, should I still be treated if I get it? I knew/had the opportunity to know the risks before I went, just as I have the opportunity to know the risks before I smoke. All government healthcare institutes a form of moral hazard into society, and moral hazard is a bad, bad thing.

Also, more related to the videos, Peter Schiff has a new (long) video up on youtube thats quite awesome, so you guys should check it out:

sigh, by new world order I mean eventually one worldwide government
call it whatever u want that sounds pretty
in alot of democrats minds, whether they know it or not, they are ultimately for a world government
are u for it k2o4? would u support it?

this one he read so he didn't screw up except once
global citizenship etc

*edit* btw I am not saying that the new world order or w/e u decide to call it exists already. I'm just asking if u would support the creation of it or help make it into a reality if Obama was for it?