1
 |
NMcNasty  United States. Feb 23 2015 23:37. Posts 2039 | | |
| | On February 23 2015 21:09 AndrewSong wrote:
If you care about your bottom line as a backer, it's important to understand anyone you back is coming with a problem. Constant monitoring will solve most of these if skill isn't one of them. Five buyin stop loss or even a stricter rule in the start is necessary to implement because it promotes closer communication with room for you to help. If you are allowing 10+ buyin stoploss for 400NL+, that's a recipe for disaster especially in games with such small skill gap. I can assure you someone who needs backing will not be a crusher to start.
|
All the above makes sense, but I think its just more reason its on the backer to make the staking arrangements explicitly clear. I mean a 2k loss at 400NL (online) is 100% bound to happen. |
|
|
1
 |
TimDawg United States. Feb 24 2015 00:32. Posts 10197 | | |
| | On February 23 2015 22:37 NMcNasty wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 23 2015 21:09 AndrewSong wrote:
If you care about your bottom line as a backer, it's important to understand anyone you back is coming with a problem. Constant monitoring will solve most of these if skill isn't one of them. Five buyin stop loss or even a stricter rule in the start is necessary to implement because it promotes closer communication with room for you to help. If you are allowing 10+ buyin stoploss for 400NL+, that's a recipe for disaster especially in games with such small skill gap. I can assure you someone who needs backing will not be a crusher to start.
|
All the above makes sense, but I think its just more reason its on the backer to make the staking arrangements explicitly clear. I mean a 2k loss at 400NL (online) is 100% bound to happen.
|
and I assumed the OP was talking about a live stake
online this is a little bit different and trickier but what I posted earlier still holds true I think |
|
| online bob is actually a pretty smart person, not at all like the creepy fucker that sits in the sofa telling me he does nasty shit to me when im asleep - pinball | Last edit: 24/02/2015 00:32 |
|
|
1
|
AndrewSong United States. Feb 24 2015 01:07. Posts 2355 | | |
if it's one time live staking, title says it all. stop loss = STOP |
|
|
4
 |
Baalim Mexico. Feb 24 2015 05:03. Posts 34250 | | |
why is this thread so fucking long seriously, when somebody breaks the term of the stake he should pay |
|
| Ex-PokerStars Team Pro Online | |
|
|
1
|
NMcNasty United States. Feb 24 2015 06:13. Posts 2039 | | |
| | On February 24 2015 00:07 AndrewSong wrote:
if it's one time live staking, title says it all. stop loss = STOP |
Agreed, I just didn't think it was since its 2/4 (not 2/5) and at least an 11k stake. |
|
|
1
 |
FrinkX United States. Feb 24 2015 06:46. Posts 7561 | | |
| | On February 24 2015 04:03 Baalim wrote:
why is this thread so fucking long seriously, when somebody breaks the term of the stake he should pay |
|
|
| bitch on a pension suck my dong | |
|
|
1
| |
| | On February 24 2015 00:07 AndrewSong wrote:
if it's one time live staking, title says it all. stop loss = STOP |
If it is a one time live stake this is obvious. Backer has little chance of getting unstuck in one session but a dam good chance to lose more.
If the stakee is on a long term deal and goes into makeup blowing the stop loss is not as bad because at least the stakee wil be on the hook for the money afterwards |
|
|
1
| |
Can't say everyone getting stakes has problems because while true for most even players like LivB take incredibly favorable stakes to grind stress free at the top. |
|
|
|
