Cannabis Cures Cancer - Page 2

I dont think anyone is trying to say that SMOKING cannabis helps with cancer. even if it does in some way, smoking is inherently bad for your lungs and can lead to tumors, cancer bla bla.

The point is that cannabis can be a useful tool in medicine. Not THE tool, but the more tools in your kit the better, right?

The widespread use is of SMOKED marijuana. Like I said, I don't think smoked cures cancer (though it may have a protective effect). That doesn't mean that cannabis doesn't cure cancer, just means that a method of administration is not suitable to do so. Other methods appear to work, mostly high potency oils when trying it on humans.

Here's some more studies for you to have fun with from an article titled Top 10 Cannabis Studies the Government Wished it Had Never Funded:

5) OOPS, MARIJUANA MAY PREVENT CANCER (PART I): Federal researchers implanted several types of cancer, including leukemia and lung cancers, in mice, then treated them with cannabinoids (unique, active components found in marijuana). THC and other cannabinoids shrank tumors and increased the mice’s lifespans. Munson, AE et al. Antineoplastic Activity of Cannabinoids. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Sept. 1975. p. 597-602. 4) OOPS, MARIJUANA MAY PREVENT CANCER, (PART II): In a 1994 study the government tried to suppress, federal researchers gave mice and rats massive doses of THC, looking for cancers or other signs of toxicity. The rodents given THC lived longer and had fewer cancers, “in a dose-dependent manner” (i.e. the more THC they got, the fewer tumors). NTP Technical Report On The Toxicology And Carcinogenesis Studies Of 1-Trans- Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol, CAS No. 1972-08-3, In F344/N Rats And B6C3F Mice, Gavage Studies. See also, “Medical Marijuana: Unpublished Federal Study Found THC-Treated Rats Lived Longer, Had Less Cancer,” AIDS Treatment News no. 263, Jan. 17, 1997. 3) OOPS, MARIJUANA MAY PREVENT CANCER (PART III): Researchers at the Kaiser-Permanente HMO, funded by NIDA, followed 65,000 patients for nearly a decade, comparing cancer rates among non-smokers, tobacco smokers, and marijuana smokers. Tobacco smokers had massively higher rates of lung cancer and other cancers. Marijuana smokers who didn’t also use tobacco had no increase in risk of tobacco-related cancers or of cancer risk overall. In fact their rates of lung and most other cancers were slightly lower than non-smokers, though the difference did not reach statistical significance. Sidney, S. et al. Marijuana Use and Cancer Incidence (California, United States). Cancer Causes and Control. Vol. 8. Sept. 1997, p. 722-728. 2) OOPS, MARIJUANA MAY PREVENT CANCER (PART IV): Donald Tashkin, a UCLA researcher whose work is funded by NIDA, did a case-control study comparing 1,200 patients with lung, head and neck cancers to a matched group with no cancer. Even the heaviest marijuana smokers had no increased risk of cancer, and had somewhat lower cancer risk than non-smokers (tobacco smokers had a 20-fold increased lung cancer risk). Tashkin D. Marijuana Use and Lung Cancer: Results of a Case-Control Study. American Thoracic Society International Conference. May 23, 2006.

dude you are the .0001% of people who's out to convince the world that the sky is actually green and our eyes just can't process it correctly.

And for the fun of it:

http://scholar.qsensei.com/content/y05d9

http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/v95/n2/abs/6603236a.html

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18025276

http://patients4medicalmarijuana.word...h-cannabis-oil-explains-how-it-works/

The science in this area has been held back, but pioneers are pushing forward as the social landscape is changing. I know I'm ahead of the wave here, but I'm certain that as the science catches up I'll no longer look crazy to y'all

pretty sure if cannabis was a 100% sure fire cure for cancer then you wouldn't be having thousands of scientists and researchers still looking for a cure.

More links for ya:

http://collapsereport.com/2012/10/10/...il-cures-cancer-without-side-effects/

http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2007/12/25/jnci.djm268.short

Cheddar we're in the early phase of science waking up. It's not as simple as "cure found, cure accepted". Should be, sadly it's not in this current insane system that we have (and people keep fighting to keep for some reason). There's a lot of politics in the mix. But the scientific community IS waking up, and I'll keep posting the details as more stuff comes out.

On December 02 2012 21:30 YouGoTGoT wrote: You are annoying with the constant weed related shit. And this is someone who loves mary jane. Not sure what you are trying to accomplish.

This. Times a million.

I had a medical card towards the end of my stay in California. Simply because it was just so much easier than dealing with retarded pot dealers who didn't know what time of day it was ever.

Correct or not, you remind me of the retards who I saw at the 'doctor's office' who looked like they had just crept out of a trash can babbling about how their 'medicine' was helping them with everything from alzheimer's to a broken nail.

In no world will weed be legalized because of claims it cures cancer. Just stop.

talking to k2o4 and trying to convince him to change his views about weed is like convincing neilly that he's a degenerate. why try?

what. again? comon dood..just smoke that sweet ganja and just accept it for what it is...a damn nice drug ;D

What I don't like about weed is that it fucks up memory...I like it a lot nevertheless.
btw. K2O4, you are better off writing about freedom and why everyone should have right to do whatever the fuck they want in their life and with their life (with respect to the human rights obv), taking drugs included.

As of now, more and more socialism is creeping into world and that's the REAL cause of weed being illegal. I don't care if it cures cancer or not. Most ppl don't care. Ppl are scared of it because of the gvnmt socialistic propaganda. They wrongly think that gvmt cares about them and is trying to help them. They don't realize that they give up on their freedom for very little help in return. Ppl massively overpay for gvnmts services every day. Everything what's privately done is done more efficently and at lower cost. When you're forced to pay, company doesn't care about being efficient and fair. That's gvnmt. They are most efficient at stealing from ppl in taxes. That's what they care about the most.

Most LP.net users don't mind weed being legal anyway. You're not helping the cause posting in here.

On December 03 2012 13:55 iakim322 wrote: I had a medical card towards the end of my stay in California. Simply because it was just so much easier than dealing with retarded pot dealers who didn't know what time of day it was ever. Correct or not, you remind me of the retards who I saw at the 'doctor's office' who looked like they had just crept out of a trash can babbling about how their 'medicine' was helping them with everything from alzheimer's to a broken nail. In no world will weed be legalized because of claims it cures cancer. Just stop.

Wait so your shitting on people who might of not had any medical problem., but didn't you do the same to get a card minus maybe the trash comment? seeing how your main reason was "dealer time bothered you". lol?

I'm not posting about this in an effort to legalize weed. I'm posting about this because there are people dying of cancer right now, and there's a medicine which they can use to safely treat themselves. Just cause the mainstream is so corrupted that this info can't get out, doesn't mean I'm going to sit back and say nothing.

Bottom line that any objective scientist will come to after looking at all the current hard data - cannabis is a very promising treatment for cancer and should be pursued with massive amounts of research. Someone like me, who isn't afraid of looking crazy, can look at all the data and say "it's almost certain that cannabis cures cancer, and while it's important to do the studies to make sure there isn't another variable to explain the results we've seen, I think they're just eliminating the very unlikely and they can do that work while I move forward and try and take some action."

So as (hopefully) a favor for all the people who seem to really be bugged by my blog titles, I've decided to change the recurring title and will retire the "Cannabis Cures Cancer" title until the mainstream finally reports the same. Till then the new title will be "Cannabis Effects on Cancer" and I'll continue doing what I've always done, blogging about every new study that comes out, be it in a lab, a case study, or anecdotal, etc. I've no doubt that there's a sea change coming in regards to the mainstream view about the affect cannabis has on cancer, and I'm going to keep documenting it as it goes down.

On December 03 2012 19:17 k2o4 wrote: I'm posting about this because there are people dying of cancer right now, and there's a medicine which they can use to safely treat themselves.

Rofl.

On December 03 2012 18:14 uiCk wrote: Show nested quote + On December 03 2012 13:55 iakim322 wrote: I had a medical card towards the end of my stay in California. Simply because it was just so much easier than dealing with retarded pot dealers who didn't know what time of day it was ever. Correct or not, you remind me of the retards who I saw at the 'doctor's office' who looked like they had just crept out of a trash can babbling about how their 'medicine' was helping them with everything from alzheimer's to a broken nail. In no world will weed be legalized because of claims it cures cancer. Just stop. Wait so your shitting on people who might of not had any medical problem., but didn't you do the same to get a card minus maybe the trash comment? seeing how your main reason was "dealer time bothered you". lol?

I don't think you actually have much in the department of reading comprehension. So I just deleted the couple sentences I wrote in response to your stupid reply. And this is it. See ya.