Full Tilt Poker Game #18843155326: Table Trolly (heads up) - $0.50/$1 - No Limit Hold'em - 9:51:22 ET - 2010/02/28
Seat 1: Night2o11 ($272.30)
Seat 2: Mrs_Fabio ($156.80)
Mrs_Fabio posts the small blind of $0.50
Night2o11 posts the big blind of $1
The button is in seat #2
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Night2o11
Mrs_Fabio raises to $3
Night2o11 has 15 seconds left to act
Night2o11 raises to $10
Mrs_Fabio calls $7
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $20.00)
Night2o11 has 15 seconds left to act
Night2o11 bets $15
Mrs_Fabio calls $15
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $50.00)
Night2o11 has 15 seconds left to act
Night2o11 has requested TIME
Night2o11 bets $30
Mrs_Fabio calls $30
River (Pot : $110.00)
Night2o11 has 15 seconds left to act
Night2o11 has requested TIME
Night2o11 bets $110
Mrs_Fabio has 15 seconds left to act
Mrs_Fabio has requested TIME
Mrs_Fabio calls $101.80, and is all in
Uncalled bet of $8.20 returned to Night2o11
Showdown
Night2o11 shows a pair of Fours
Mrs_Fabio shows
two pair, Eights and Fours
Mrs_Fabio wins the pot ($313.10) with two pair, Eights and Fours
Summary
Total pot $313.60 | Rake $0.50
Board:
Seat 1: Night2o11 (big blind) showed and lost with a pair of Fours
Seat 2: Mrs_Fabio (small blind) showed and won ($313.10) with two pair, Eights and Fours
1
| |
amazing..what the fuck is he doing.. why isn't this one of the last 20 hands where I literally had AK/KK+ everytime I 3bet hi mand he snap folded preflop..but then now... T8 is good for a calldown for a massive pot.. this is why I don't understand HU. unbelievable. seriously.. |
|
| | Last edit: 28/02/2010 09:56 |
|
|
1
 |
edzwoo United States. Feb 28 2010 10:17. Posts 5911 | | |
I rarely ever pull off big bluffs in HU for this reason. People call me down 3 streets with midpair way too often, so just by that logic bluffing seems pretty bad unless you hit the perfect spot.
It just seems logical to bluff more in HU, but I think the call frequency increase in HU skyrockets beyond anything else. So of course that means I valuebet a ton more, and I'm c/r-ing TPGK like it's a set.
Vs the average NL100 HU player that is. Obviously it's totally villain specific, but if I had to start with a basic framework, that's what it is. |
|
| | Last edit: 28/02/2010 10:18 |
|
|
1
 |
kingpowa France. Feb 28 2010 10:27. Posts 1525 | | |
| | On February 28 2010 08:50 Night2o1 wrote:
deep play:
shovel money in until they fold |
But 6max is not HU. |
|
| sorry for shitty english. | |
|
|
1
 |
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Feb 28 2010 10:28. Posts 15163 | | |
Well you have changed the dynamic by 3 betting a lot so he adjusts.
And as for the river... maybe he doesn't expect you to shove 99-KK or maybe not even hands like Ank Here and A is a typical bluff card... Boom..Polarised...regs dont fold :o |
| |
|
|
1
| |
I'm not even remotely polarized here I just never have it .. LOLLlll....
yeah good point edz and I think you're 100% right... I'm just running sick bad and tilting hard.. just wasting everyone's time
villain is also not a reg feh |
|
| | Last edit: 28/02/2010 10:34 |
|
|
1
|
LemOn[5thF] Czech Republic. Feb 28 2010 10:39. Posts 15163 | | |
so you dont shove Ax here? OO
EDIT: well if he is not a reg why bluff him huge in the first place -.- |
|
| 93% Sure! | Last edit: 28/02/2010 10:42 |
|
|
1
| |
I said I'm NOT polarized.. I just never actually have hands lately.
he seems pretty competent now that I've been playing him actually |
|
|
1
|
exalted United States. Feb 28 2010 10:55. Posts 2918 | | |
yea i mean this hand is sic standard |
|
| exalted from teamliquid :o | |
|
|
1
| |
| | On February 28 2010 09:55 exalted wrote:
yea i mean this hand is sic standard |
which way |
|
|
|
