PokerStars Game #27467303084: Holdem No Limit ($0.25/$0.50) - 2009/04/25 3:20:44 CT [2009/04/25 4:20:44 ET]
Table Alioth 6-max Seat #1 is the button
Seat 1: CnopTcmeH08 ($50 in chips)
Seat 2: Hero ($50.25 in chips)
Seat 3: callmedk ($99.85 in chips)
Seat 4: crovax4444 ($53.95 in chips)
Seat 5: Chandepiaf ($17.25 in chips)
Seat 6: IGotOneOut ($50 in chips)
Hero: posts small blind $0.25
callmedk: posts big blind $0.50
Holecards Dealt to Hero
crovax4444: raises $1.50 to $2
Chandepiaf: folds
IGotOneOut has timed out
IGotOneOut: folds
IGotOneOut is sitting out
CnopTcmeH08: folds
Hero: calls $1.75
callmedk: folds
Flop (Pot : $4.50)
Hero: checks
crovax4444: bets $3
Hero: calls $3
Turn (Pot : $10.50)
Hero: checks
crovax4444: bets $8
Hero: calls $8
River (Pot : $26.50)
Hero: checks
crovax4444: bets $40.95 and is all-in
you have to check his flop turn river aggression frequency % most people have very obvious patterns
most regs simply never bluff the river this way really
but at the same time i look at this hand and go wtf omg, cause you under repped your hand so horribly its like a crime to fold this river on that basis alone
but it really depends on this villains aggression frequency % and tendencies, you should know something about him ?
theres like absolutely no reason for him to ever be bluffing here, thats the thing.. i mean, you dont have a lot of draws to be on, any competent villain (well, thats assuming alot right) puts you on an ace after two calls imo
rockman255: its not easy being superman U N0 MySteeZ: mega man. rockman255: same thing U N0 MySteeZ: no