PokerStars Game #27250680024: Holdem No Limit ($0.50/$1.00) - 2009/04/19 1:53:45 CT [2009/04/19 2:53:45 ET]
Table Prothoon 6-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: Hero ($103.20 in chips)
Seat 2: Got_Dah_Nutz ($35.75 in chips)
Seat 3: john808080 ($100 in chips)
Seat 4: Naam79 ($100 in chips)
Seat 5: FerGadSakes ($88.20 in chips)
Seat 6: I3ig_Ant ($37.60 in chips)
john808080: posts small blind $0.50
Naam79: posts big blind $1
Holecards
Dealt to Hero 
FerGadSakes: raises $7 to $8
I3ig_Ant: folds
Hero: raises $19 to $27
Got_Dah_Nutz: folds
john808080: folds
Naam79: raises $73 to $100 and is all-in
FerGadSakes: calls $80.20 and is all-in
1
 |
joLin United States. Apr 19 2009 02:59. Posts 3818 | | |
wut to do? pfr is a monkey |
| |
|
|
1
|
Sicks Macks United States. Apr 19 2009 03:24. Posts 3929 | | |
Still need to know what Naam is like and whether he's been around long enough to know pfr is a monkey. |
| |
|
|
1
|
Uptown . Apr 19 2009 03:24. Posts 3557 | | |
depends on your reads on the guy in bb, and what your image is like on the table. If you've been 3betting like a monkey IP then his cold 4bet shove range could be wider than your standard QQ+/AK.
idk =/ |
| |
|
|
1
|
joLin United States. Apr 19 2009 03:29. Posts 3818 | | |
no reads on naam. this is a fold then? since he 4bet shoves over an 8x open and 3bet. |
| |
|
|
1
|
Fraser Canada. Apr 19 2009 03:36. Posts 4605 | | | |
|
|
1
|
Fraser Canada. Apr 19 2009 03:50. Posts 4605 | | |
you're getting great pot odds vs one range where you're a little behind and another you're probably well ahead of. Think of it this way, you would never 4bet fold AK hu, why would you fold it now when you're getting better pot odds and up against one "normal" range which is probably QQ+ and AK and another donkey range. |
|
|
1
|
joLin United States. Apr 19 2009 03:58. Posts 3818 | | |
thanks. yea i called considering my pot odds. |
| |
|
|
1
| |
thats quite a bit 3bet. you have 27 invested why holding AK. Easy call. Especially because there is a fish you're getting 2:1 on your money if you win. So you should call even if you knew naam had KK. Because your AK still has 30% equity.
Given that his range is more like QQ, KK, AA, AK you are basicly only in real trouble against AA. |
|
| | Last edit: 19/04/2009 04:06 |
|
|
1
|
Fraser Canada. Apr 19 2009 04:15. Posts 4605 | | |
interestingly after stoving this it isn't nearly as much of a slamdunk call as i thought. AK doesn't do that well when the fish counterfits alot of our outs against JJ-KK. |
|
|
1
|
1
| |
hell for all we know they both hold QQ and we spike a pair and GGGGGGGGGGG ez life |
|
|
1
|
palak United States. Apr 19 2009 04:23. Posts 4601 | | | |
|
| dont tap the glass...im about ready to take a fucking hammer to the aquarium | |
|
|
1
|
Fraser Canada. Apr 19 2009 11:42. Posts 4605 | | |
| | On April 19 2009 03:16 gororokgororok wrote:
fish can have TT as well |
i stoved it giving the fish 99+, AJ+ and KQ and its still barely a call. |
|
|
|
