Back Submit a hand
Handnr: 558629
Submitted by : remember87
Full Tilt Poker Game #8745190209: Table Racel (6 max) - $1/$2 - No Limit Hold'em - 12:06:35 ET - 2008/10/31
Seat 1: g0t T1lt 3 ($216)
Seat 2: michaelt12 ($764)
Seat 3: Hanley Ramirez ($203.70)
Seat 4: Mr Omahas ($214)
Seat 5: gangstaruns ($47.20)
Seat 6: Hero ($228)
Hero posts the small blind of $1
g0t T1lt 3 posts the big blind of $2
The button is in seat #5
Holecards(Odds)
Dealt to Hero  
michaelt12 raises to $7
Hanley Ramirez folds
Mr Omahas folds
gangstaruns folds
Hero calls $6
g0t T1lt 3 has 15 seconds left to act
g0t T1lt 3 calls $5
Flop(Odds) (Pot : $21.00)
  
Hero checks
g0t T1lt 3 checks
michaelt12 bets $14
Hero calls $14
g0t T1lt 3 has 15 seconds left to act
g0t T1lt 3 folds
Turn(Odds) (Pot : $49.00)
Hero checks
michaelt12 checks
River (Pot : $49.00)
Hero bets $25
michaelt12 calls $25
Showdown
Hero shows two pair, Queens and Twos
michaelt12 shows   two pair, Aces and Twos
michaelt12 wins the pot ($96) with two pair, Aces and Twos
Hero adds $18
Summary
Total pot $99 | Rake $3
Board:
Seat 1: g0t T1lt 3 (big blind) folded on the Flop
Seat 2: michaelt12 showed and won ($96) with two pair, Aces and Twos
Seat 3: Hanley Ramirez didn't bet (folded)
Seat 4: Mr Omahas didn't bet (folded)
Seat 5: gangstaruns (button) didn't bet (folded)
Seat 6: Hero (small blind) showed and lost with two pair, Queens and Twos
 |
Comments |
 |
1 | |
you realize you're tying with other queens due to the ace right |
|
| 1 | |
I screwed this hand pretty bad. I was going for a checkraise on the turn but he checked behind. So when the A came up I made a bet that was half for value and half as a blockbet.
I´m not shure at all this play is good at all. Can I make a check-fold? Is he checking behind enough with a bad A that I loose money in betting as a blockingbet? What do you think? |
|
| Vegetarian - an old indian word for ”bad hunter” | |
|
| 1 | |
I didnt put him on a Q so I was hoping to get value from a lower pair or save money if he had a an A (if he bet like 34$ or w/e) |
|
| Vegetarian - an old indian word for ”bad hunter” | |
|
| 1 | |
You're not gaining any value by betting the river and queens that you tie with are not going to fold. I would just checkfold the river, since he will be checking behind any queens or underpairs and only bet things that beat you, normally. Check/call if you have a decent read, but betting seems quite bad.
Also, he's never going to call the river with an underpair. ever. |
|
| | Last edit: 31/10/2008 21:34 |
|
| 1 | |
thanks, that was what I was hoping to hear  |
|
| Vegetarian - an old indian word for ”bad hunter” | |
|
| 1 | |
river has to be either a check-call or check-fold I think
betting doesnt make much sense because you're only being called with hands that beat you or that you split with
check-call means you lose the same vs hands that beat you (or granted, possibly a few dollars more as you didnt fire very big) but that you can also beat bluffs, check-fold means you dont lose any more but that you can also be bluffed |
| |
|
| 1 | |
in fact the only arguement I can see for betting river is wanting to bluff out a queen that now splits with you =p |
| |
|
| 1 | |
and that wasnt the purpose of the bet at all so I guess it should have been a check-fold then... as you are saying, I think he will only bet when he has me beat.. |
|
| Vegetarian - an old indian word for ”bad hunter” | |
|
| |
|
